CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


JONES V. OPELIKA, 319 U. S. 103 (1943)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 319 U. S. 103 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Jones v. Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Jones v. Opelika

No. 280, October Term, 1941

Reargued March 10, 11, 1943

Decided May 3, 1943

319 U.S. 103

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

Syllabus

Upon rehearing, 318 U.S. 796, the judgments heretofore entered in these cases, 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584, affirming the judgments of the state courts, are vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. P. 319 U. S. 104.

242 Ala. 549, 7 So.2d 503, reversed.

202 Ark. 614, 151 S.W.2d 1000, reversed.

58 Ariz. 144, 118 P.2d 97, reversed. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 319 U. S. 104

PER CURIAM (announced by MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS).

The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U. S. 316 U.S. 584. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Murdock v. Pennsylvania, post, p. 319 U. S. 105. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in the Murdock case and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed.

So ordered.

For dissenting opinions of MR. JUSTICE REED, and MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER, see post, pp. 319 U. S. 117-140.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED