CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


TUNSTALL V. BROTHER OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN, 323 U. S. 210 (1944)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 323 U. S. 210 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Tunstall v. Brother of Locomotive Firemen, 323 U.S. 210 (1944)

Tunstall v. Brother of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

No. 37

Argued November 14, 1944

Decided December 18, 1944

323 U.S. 210

Syllabus

1. The Railway Labor Act imposes on a labor organization, acting as the exclusive bargaining representative of a craft or class of railway employees, the duty to represent all the employees in the craft without discrimination because of race. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co., ante, p. 323 U. S. 192. P. 323 U. S. 211.

2. The federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain a nondiversity suit in which petitioner, a railway employee subject to the Railway Labor Act, seeks remedies by injunction and award of damages for the failure of the union bargaining representative of his craft to perform the duty imposed on it by the Act, to represent petitioner and other members of his craft without discrimination because of race. P. 323 U. S. 212.

3. Petitioner's cause of action is not excluded by the Railway Labor Act from the consideration of the federal courts. P. 323 U. S. 213.

4. The right asserted by the petitioner is derived from the duty imposed by the Railway Labor Act on the bargaining representative, and is a federal right implied from the statute and the policy which it has adopted. P. 323 U. S. 213.

5. The case is therefore one arising under a law regulating commerce, of which the federal courts are given jurisdiction by 28 U.S.C. § 41(8). P. 323 U. S. 213.

6. The petitioner has no administrative remedy available, and the bill of complaint states a cause of action entitling him to relief. P. 323 U. S. 213.

140 F.2d 35 reversed.

Certiorari, 322 U.S. 721, to review the affirmance of a judgment dismissing a complaint for want of jurisdiction. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 323 U. S. 211





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED