US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

PRIEBE & SONS., INC. V. UNITED STATES, 332 U. S. 407 (1947)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 332 U. S. 407 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Priebe & Sons., Inc. v. United States, 332 U.S. 407 (1947)

Priebe & Sons., Inc. v. United States

No. 16

Argued October 13, 1947.

Decided November 17, 1947

332 U.S. 407


1. Pursuant to a program for aiding England and Russia under the Lend-Lease Act of March 11, 1941, petitioner contracted to supply to the Federal Surplus Commodities Corporation a quantity of dried eggs. The contract specified "May 18 [1942] delivery," which date

"shall be the first day of a 10-day period within which the FSCC will accept delivery, the particular day within the period being at the FSCC's option;"

required petitioner to have the eggs inspected and that delivery be accompanied by inspection and weight certificates, and provided that "failure to have specified quantities of dried egg products inspected and ready for delivery by the date specified in the offer" would make operative a provision for "liquidated damages." It did not provide for notice to the Government when the shipments were ready. Inspection and certification, though not completed by May 18, were completed prior to the dates designated by the FSCC for deliveries, and petitioner made timely deliveries pursuant to instructions.

Held: The provision for "liquidated damages" constituted a penalty, and was not enforceable. Pp. 332 U. S. 408-414.

2. The contract is construed to mean that the time for delivery by petitioner was not May 18, 1942, but the time or times chosen by the FSCC within the 10-day period which began on May 18 -- i.e., performance was not due until request was made and instructions given for delivery. P. 332 U. S. 410.

3. Since the provision in question did not cover delays in deliveries, it could not possibly be a reasonable forecast of just compensation for damage caused by breach of contract. P. 412.

4. Congress did not expressly grant the power to impose penalties as sanctions to the program adopted pursuant to the Lend-Lease Act, and that power may not be implied. Pp. 332 U. S. 413-414.

106 Ct.Cl. 789, 65 F.Supp. 457, reversed.

The Court of Claims dismissed petitioner's suit to recover sums alleged to be due upon a contract with the chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 332 U. S. 408

Government. 106 Ct.Cl. 789, 65 F.Supp. 457. This Court granted certiorari. 330 U.S. 815. Reversed, p. 332 U. S. 414.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™