CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


BLACKMAR V. GUERRE, 342 U. S. 512 (1952)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 342 U. S. 512 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Blackmar v. Guerre, 342 U.S. 512 (1952)

Blackmar v. Guerre

No. 361

Argued January 30-31, 1952

Decided March 3, 1952

342 U.S. 512

Syllabus

Petitioner was discharged from his position in the Regional Office of the Veterans' Administration in New Orleans, and this action was sustained by the Civil Service Commission in Washington. He brought suit in a federal district court in Louisiana against the Manager of the Regional Office and the Civil Service Commission (eo nomine) to have these actions set aside.

Held: the suit was properly dismissed. Pp. 342 U. S. 513-516.

1. Defendants' challenges to the venue and jurisdiction of the district court were properly presented by motion and answer. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 12(b). P. 342 U. S. 514.

2. Congress has not constituted the Civil Service Commission a body corporate or authorized it to be sued eo nomine. Pp. 342 U. S. 514-516.

(a) The present suit against the Commission eo nomine is not authorized by the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. § 118k(c). Pp. 342 U. S. 514-515.

(b) Nor was this suit authorized by the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1009, which provides for review of agency action only in a court of "competent jurisdiction." The courts of the District of Columbia are the only courts of "competent jurisdiction" to reach the members of the Civil Service Commission. Pp. 342 U. S. 515-516.

3. The only defendant before the court was the Regional Director, and it is obvious that no relief could be granted against him in this suit. Pp. 342 U. S. 515-516.

190 F.2d 427, affirmed. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 342 U. S. 513





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED