CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


NATHANSON V. LABOR BOARD, 344 U. S. 25 (1952)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 344 U. S. 25 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Nathanson v. Labor Board, 344 U.S. 25 (1952)

Nathanson v. Labor Board

No. 33

Argued October 23, 1952

Decided November 10, 1952

344 U.S. 25

Syllabus

The National Labor Relations Board ordered a company to pay certain employees backpay. After an involuntary petition in bankruptcy had been filed against the company, the Court of Appeals decreed enforcement of the Board's order. The Board filed in the bankruptcy proceeding a proof of claim for the backpay.

Held:

1. The Board is a "creditor" as respects the backpay awards, within the meaning of the Bankruptcy Act. Pp. 344 U. S. 26-27.

2. The Board's backpay order is a provable claim in bankruptcy -- as a debt founded upon an "implied" contract within the meaning of § 63(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Act. P. 344 U. S. 27.

3. The Board's claim is not a debt due to the United States within the meaning of R.S. § 3466, and it is not entitled to priority under § 64(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Act, though it is entitled to such priority as wage claims enjoy under § 64(a)(2). Bramwell v. United States Fidelity Co., 269 U. S. 483, distinguished. Pp. 344 U. S. 27-29.

4. Computation of the amount of the backpay award was properly referred to the Board by the bankruptcy court. Pp. 344 U. S. 29-30.

(a) The fixing of the backpay is one of the functions confided to the Board as an administrative matter. Pp. 344 U. S. 29-30.

(b) Wise administration demands that the bankruptcy court accommodate itself to the administrative process and refer to the Board the liquidation of the claim, giving the Board a reasonable time for its administrative determination. P. 344 U. S. 30.

194 F.2d 24 reversed.

A proof of claim filed by the National Labor Relations Board, based on a backpay award against the bankrupt, was disallowed by the referee in bankruptcy. The District Court set aside the disallowance. 100 F.Supp. 489. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 194 F.2d 248. This chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 344 U. S. 26

Court granted certiorari. 343 U.S. 962. Reversed and remanded, p. 344 U. S. 31.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED