US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

KERN LIMERICK, INC. V. SCURLOCK, 347 U. S. 110 (1954)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 347 U. S. 110 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Kern Limerick, Inc. v. Scurlock, 347 U.S. 110 (1954)

Kern Limerick, Inc. v. Scurlock

No. 115

Argued January 4, 1954

Decided February 8, 1954

347 U.S. 110


The Arkansas Gross Receipts Tax Law of 1941, which levies on sellers an excise tax of 2% on the gross receipts from all sales in the State, held unconstitutional as applied to the transactions here involved, whereby private contractors procured in Arkansas two tractors for use in constructing a naval ammunition depot for the United States under a cost plus fixed fee contract entered into with the Navy Department under §§ 2(c)(10) and 4(b) of the Armed Services Procurement Act of 1947, and providing that, in procuring articles required for accomplishment of the work, the contractor should act as purchasing agent for the Government, title to the articles purchased should pass directly from the vendor to the Government, and the Government should be directly liable to the vendor for payment of the purchase price. Pp. 347 U. S. 111-123.

(a) The Procurement Act authorized the purchase of this machinery by the Navy for the construction of an ammunition depot. P. 347 U. S. 114.

(b) Under the Procurement Act, the Navy Department has power to negotiate contracts which provide for private purchasing agents for supplies and materials. Pp. 347 U. S. 114-116.

(c) The restrictions in § 7(b) on delegations of authority are not applicable to actions under § 2(c)(10). Pp. 347 U. S. 115-116.

(d) Under the contract here involved, the United States was the real purchaser; the naming of the Government as purchaser was not merely colorable, and did not leave the contractor the real purchaser. Alabama v. King & Boozer, 314 U. S. 1, distinguished. Pp. 347 U. S. 116-122.

(e) The drafting of the contract by the Navy Department to conserve Government funds, if that was the purpose, does not change the character of the transaction. Pp. 347 U. S. 122-123.

221 Ark. 439, 254 S.W.2d 454, reversed.

The Supreme Court of Arkansas held the Arkansas Gross Receipts Tax Law of 1941, Ark. Stat., 1947, § 81901 et seq., applicable to the sale of certain machinery chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 347 U. S. 111

in Arkansas for use in the construction of a naval ammunition depot for the United States. 221 Ark. 439, 254 S.W.2d 454. On appeal, to this Court, reversed, p. 347 U. S. 123.

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™