CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


IN RE DISBARMENT OF ISSERMAN, 348 U. S. 1 (1954)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 348 U. S. 1 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

In re Disbarment of Isserman, 348 U.S. 1 (1954)

In re Disbarment of Isserman

No. 5, Misc.

October Term, 1952

Decided October 14, 1954

348 U.S. 1

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Syllabus

Since a majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment, as required by Rule 8 of the present Rules of this Court, the order of disbarment, 345 U. S. 286, is set aside, and the rule to show cause is discharged.

PER CURIAM.

April 6, 1953, an order was entered disbarring Isserman from the practice of law in this Court pursuant to Rule 2, par. 5, of this Court's Rules then in effect. See In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286. The order of disbarment is now before us on a petition for rehearing. Rule 8 of our present Rules provides that "no order of disbarment will be entered except with the concurrence of a majority of the justices participating." The petition for rehearing is granted. A majority of the Justices participating do not find ground for disbarment of Isserman. Accordingly, the former order of disbarment is set aside, and the rule against Isserman to show cause is discharged.

MR. JUSTICE BURTON, with whom MR. JUSTICE REED and MR. JUSTICE MINTON join, dissents for the reasons chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 348 U. S. 2

stated in the opinion announced by Mr. Chief Justice Vinson, April 6, 1953, in In re Isserman, 345 U. S. 286.

MR. JUSTICE REED also calls attention to his dissent in Sacher v. Association of the Bar, 347 U. S. 388, 347 U. S. 390.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and MR. JUSTICE CLARK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED