CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


SOCIETY FOR SAVINGS V. BOWERS, 349 U. S. 143 (1955)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 349 U. S. 143 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Society for Savings v. Bowers, 349 U.S. 143 (1955)

Society for Savings v. Bowers

Argued March 28, 1955

Decided May 16, 1955*

349 U.S. 143

Syllabus

Ohio assessed a property tax against a mutual savings bank and a federal savings and loan association in their own names. The tax was measured by the amount of each bank's capital, surplus or reserve and undivided profits, without deduction of the value of obligations of the Federal Government owned by it. Neither bank had any capital stock or shareholders, each was owned by its depositors, and there was no provision for reimbursement of the bank by its depositors for the tax.

Held: the tax is void as a tax upon obligations of the Federal Government. Pp. 349 U. S. 144-155.

(a) In determining the validity of the tax under federal law, this Court is not bound by the conclusion of the Supreme Court of Ohio that the tax is imposed on the depositors, rather than on the banks. P. 349 U. S. 151.

(b) In the circumstances of this case, the tax must be regarded for federal purposes as one imposed on the banks, rather than on the depositors. Pp. 349 U. S. 151-154.

(c) Without provisions protecting the banks against the burdens of the tax, it cannot be assumed that the operation of the tax statute will not infringe on the immunity of the federal obligations held by them. P. 349 U. S. 154.

161 Ohio St. 122, 118 N. E. 2d 651, and 161 Ohio St. 149, 118 N.E 2d 667, reversed. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 349 U. S. 144





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED