US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

HEIKKINEN V. UNITED STATES, 355 U. S. 273 (1958)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 355 U. S. 273 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Heikkinen v. United States, 355 U.S. 273 (1958)

Heikkinen v. United States

No. 89

Argued December 10, 1957

Decided January 6, 1958

355 U.S. 273


An alien who had been ordered deported was convicted of violating § 20(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended, by "willfully" (1) failing to depart from the United States, and (2) failing to make timely application for travel or other documents necessary to his departure, within six months from the date of the final order of deportation.

Held: on the record in this case, the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict, and the conviction is reversed. Pp. 355 U. S. 274-280.

1. There being no evidence that any country was willing to receive him, it cannot be said that there was any evidence to support a finding that he "willfully" failed to depart. P. 355 U. S. 276.

2. In view of statements made to him by an Immigration Inspector indicating that the Immigration and Naturalization Service would take steps to obtain travel documents for him, and in view of a letter to him from the Officer in Charge stating that arrangements were being made to effect his deportation and that he would be notified when and where to present himself for deportation, it cannot be said that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that he acted "willfully" in failing to make timely application for the documents necessary to his departure. Pp. 355 U. S. 276-280.

40 F.2d 94 reversed. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 355 U. S. 274

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™