US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 355 U.S. 394

U.S. Supreme Court

STRAUSS v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 355 U.S. 394 (1958)

355 U.S. 394

STRAUSS ET AL. v. UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 610.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 2 N. Y. 2d 464, 141 N. E. 2d 595.

Alan Y. Cole for appellants.

Charles A. Brind, Jr. for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, <a href="https://chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/355/394/case.php">355 U.S. 394</A> (1958) 355 U.S. 394 (1958) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

TAYLOR v. KENTUCKY, 355 U.S. 394 (1958)

355 U.S. 394

TAYLOR ET AL. v. KENTUCKY.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 611.
Decided January 20, 1958.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 302 S. W. 2d 583.

Alexander H. Sands, Littleton M. Wickham and H. V. Forsyth for appellants.

Jo M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kentucky, and William F. Simpson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 355 U.S. 394, 395








chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com