US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)
Subscribe to Cases that cite COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282U.S. Supreme Court
F. & M. SCHAEFER BREW. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER, NEW YORK, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)
358 U.S. 282 F. & M. SCHAEFER BREWING CO. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF THE CITY OF NEW
YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 526.
Decided January 12, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 4 N. Y. 2d 423, 151 N. E. 2d 845.
Russell D. Morrill and Francis L. Casey for appellant.
Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
U.S. Supreme Court
McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA, 358 U.S. 282 (1959)
358 U.S. 282 McDANIEL v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 283, Misc.
Decided January 12, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 157 Cal. App. 2d 492, 321 P.2d 497.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
MR. JUSTICE FRANKFURTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
