US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85 (1959)
Subscribe to Cases that cite INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85U.S. Supreme Court
TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85 (1959)
361 U.S. 85 TAHITI BAR, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 363.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 395 Pa. 355, 150 A. 2d 112.
Edwin P. Rome for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
U.S. Supreme Court
LEHIGH CASINO, v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD, 361 U.S. 85 (1959)
361 U.S. 85 LEHIGH CASINO, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 379.
Decided November 9, 1959.
Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Reported below: 395 Pa. 355, 150 A. 2d 112.
Henry I. Jacobson for appellant.
Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, George G. Lindsay, Assistant Attorney General, and Russell C. Wismer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
