CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


KRESHIK V. SAINT NICHOLAS CATHEDRAL, 363 U. S. 190 (1960)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 363 U. S. 190 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Kreshik v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral, 363 U.S. 190 (1960)

Kreshik v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral of the

Russian Orthodox Church of North America

No. 824

Decided June 6, 1960

363 U.S. 190

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK

Syllabus

Certiorari is granted and a decision of the Court of Appeals of New York, holding that, under the common law of New York, petitioners, as the appointees of the Patriarch of Moscow, may not exercise the right conferred under canon law to use and occupy St. Nicholas Cathedral of the Russian Orthodox Church in New York City, is reversed on the authority of Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral, 344 U. S. 94, since the constitutional principles there applied forbid the judiciary, as well as the legislature, of a State to interfere with the free exercise of religion.

Pp. 363 U. S. 190-191.

7 N.Y.2d 191, 164 N.E.2d 687, reversed.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed upon the record in No. 3, October Term 1952, and the petition for certiorari, are granted.

In a prior decision in this litigation, we held that the right conferred under canon law upon the Archbishop of the North American Archdiocese of the Russian Orthodox Greek Catholic Church, as the appointee of the Patriarch of Moscow, to the use and occupancy of the St. Nicholas Cathedral in New York City, owned by respondent corporation, was "strictly a matter of ecclesiastical government," and, as such, could not constitutionally be impaired by a state statute, New York Religious Corporations chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 363 U. S. 191

Law, McKinney's Consol.Laws, c. 51, Art. 5-C, purporting to bestow that right on another. Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral, 344 U. S. 94. We reversed a judgment of the New York Court of Appeals against the petitioners' predecessors in office, and remanded the case for "further action . . . not in contravention" of our opinion. Id. at 344 U. S. 121.

The Court of Appeals ordered a retrial of the question of petitioners' right to use and occupancy, on a common law issue assertedly left open by our invalidation of the statutory basis for the former decision. 306 N.Y. 38, 114 N.E.2d 197. After trial, the Court of Appeals directed the entry of judgment against petitioners, holding that, by reason of the domination -- so found by that court to be the fact -- of the Patriarch by the secular authority in the U.S.S.R., his appointee could not, under the common law of New York, validly exercise the right to occupy the Cathedral. 7 N.Y.2d 191, 196 N.Y.S.2d 655, 164 N.E.2d 687.

As the opinions of the Court of Appeals make evident, compare 302 N.Y. 1 at 29-33, 96 N.E.2d 56 at 72-74, with 7 N.Y.2d at 209-216, 196 N.Y.S.2d at 667-673, 164 N.E.2d at 696-700, the decision now under review rests on the same premises which were found to have underlain the enactment of the statute struck down in Kedroff. 344 U.S. at 344 U. S. 117-118. But it is established doctrine that

"[i]t is not of moment that the State has here acted solely through its judicial branch, for, whether legislative or judicial, it is still the application of state power which we are asked to scrutinize."

NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U. S. 449, 357 U. S. 463. See Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U. S. 1, 334 U. S. 14-16, and cases there cited. Accordingly, our ruling in Kedroff is controlling here, and requires dismissal of the complaint.

Reversed.





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED