US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

THOMAS v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 286 (1960)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 364 U.S. 286

U.S. Supreme Court

THOMAS v. MICHIGAN, 364 U.S. 286 (1960)

364 U.S. 286

THOMAS ET AL. v. MICHIGAN.
APPEAL FROM THE RECORDER'S COURT OF THE CITY OF DETROIT.
No. 98.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed.

Harold Norris and H. Franklin Brown for appellants.

Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.


KOPPERS COMPANY INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA, <a href="https://chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/364/286/case.php">364 U.S. 286</A> (1960) 364 U.S. 286 (1960) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

KOPPERS COMPANY INC. v. PENNSYLVANIA, 364 U.S. 286 (1960)

364 U.S. 286

KOPPERS COMPANY, INC., v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 100.
Decided October 10, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 397 Pa. 523, 156 A. 2d 328.

Roy J. Keefer for appellant.

Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 364 U.S. 286, 287








chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com