CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 368 U.S. 813 (1961)

Subscribe to Cases that cite INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO., 368 U.S. 813 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC. v. WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. , 368 U.S. 813 (1961)

368 U.S. 813

SUNKIST GROWERS, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
WINCKLER & SMITH CITRUS PRODUCTS CO. et al.
No. 241.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 9, 1961

Ross C. Fisher and Herman F. Selvin, for petitioners.

William C. Dixon, for respondents.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

    '1. Where a group of citrus fruit growers form a cooperative organization for the purpose of collectively processing and marketing their fruit, and carry out those functions through the agency of three co-operative agricultural associations, each of which is basically wholly owned and governed by those growers, and each of which is admittedly entitled to the exemption from the antitrust laws accorded to agricultural cooperatives by the Capper-Volstead Act (7 U. S.C.A., sec. 291)-is an unlawful conspiracy, combination or agreement established under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act [15 U.S.C.A. 1, 2] upon proof only that these growers, through the agency of these three cooperatives, agreed among only themselves with respect to the extent of the division of the function of processing between them or with respect to the price they would charge in the open market for the fruit and the by-products thereof processed and marketed by them?'

The case is transferred to the summary calendar.[ Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. 368 U.S. 813 (1961) ]





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED