CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


BENZ V. NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTH., 369 U. S. 147 (1962)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 369 U. S. 147 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Benz v. New York State Thruway Auth., 369 U.S. 147 (1962)

Benz v. New York State Thruway Authority

No. 234

Argued February 28-March 1, 1962

Decided March 19, 1962

369 U.S. 147

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK

Syllabus

Since it now appears that this case presents no substantial federal question, the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Reported below: 9 N.Y.2d 486, 174 N.E.2d 727.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari in this case, 368 U. S. 886, to decide whether the State of New York could, consistently with the Fourteenth Amendment, assert sovereign immunity in a suit brought by petitioner to reform on grounds of mutual mistake, or to rescind for fraud in the inducement, an agreement fixing compensation for land taken under the power of eminent domain. Contrary to our initial impression of the case on the basis of the petition for certiorari, plenary consideration has satisfied us that the New York Court of Appeals decided no more than that this suit could not be maintained in the Supreme Court of the State of New York because exclusive jurisdiction over litigation of this character had been vested in the New York Court of Claims. The case then involves only a matter relating to "the distribution of jurisdiction in the state courts," and presents no substantial federal question. E.g., Honeyman v. Hanan, 302 U. S. 375. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 369 U. S. 148

Since the representative of the State Attorney General advised us on oral argument that the Attorney General will recommend passage of a bill by the State Legislature relieving petitioner from the operation of the statute of limitations governing proceedings in the New York Court of Claims, * we assume that she will be free to present her claims in the appropriate state forum.

The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents.

MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

* [Reporter's Note: Such a bill became a law on April 29, 1962, N.Y.Laws 1962, c. 940.]





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED