US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, 374 U.S. 96 (1963)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 374 U.S. 96

U.S. Supreme Court

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, 374 U.S. 96 (1963)

374 U.S. 96

BRIGGS v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, COMMITTEE ON BAR ADMISSIONS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 1070, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Appellant pro se.

Felicien Y. Lozes for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, <a href="https://chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/374/96/case.php">374 U.S. 96</A> (1963) 374 U.S. 96 (1963) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK, 374 U.S. 96 (1963)

374 U.S. 96

BOLLETTIERI v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, ONEIDA COUNTY.
No. 1378, Misc.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, and Robert E. Fischer and Maxwell B. Spoont, Special Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 374 U.S. 96, 97



Full Text of Opinion







chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com