CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. BARTHE, 376 U.S. 189 (1964)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 376 U.S. 189 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. BARTHE, 376 U.S. 189 (1964)

376 U.S. 189

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS ET AL. v. BARTHE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
LOUISIANA. No. 663.
Decided February 17, 1964.

Appeal dismissed; certiorari granted; and judgment affirmed.

Reported below: 219 F. Supp. 788.

Alvin J. Liska for appellants.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Ernest N. Morial and A. P. Tureaud for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, before judgment,* pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1254 (1), to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the petition is granted. The judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana is affirmed. Turner v. City of Memphis, 369 U.S. 350; Watson v. City of Memphis, 373 U.S. 526.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that this case is not appealable to this Court under 28 U.S.C. 1253 but is appealable to the Court of Appeals under 28 U.S.C. 1291, and that this Court should dismiss the appeal for the Court of Appeals to consider and decide the appeal of this case now properly pending before it. See Bailey v. Patterson, 369 U.S. 31.

[Footnote *] See Griffin v. Prince Edward County Bd., 375 U.S. 391, and cases cited.

Page 376 U.S. 189, 190





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED