CHANROBLES VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY
US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for www.chanrobles.com


CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 886 (1966)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 384 U.S. 886 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 886 (1966)

384 U.S. 886

CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 33.
Decided June 20, 1966.*

Certiorari granted; No. 33, 338 F.2d 883; No. 218, 343 F.2d 548, vacated and remanded.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 218, Tramunti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States in No. 33. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 218.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in the result.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Page 384 U.S. 886, 887





Back
ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for chanrobles.com Search for www.chanrobles.com


Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



www.chanrobles.us




QUICK SEARCH

cralaw

Browse By ->> Volume


cralaw

Browse By ->> Year


cralaw

  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library | chanrobles.com™
 
RED