US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)
Subscribe to Cases that cite 390 U.S. 744U.S. Supreme Court
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. v. UNITED STATES, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)
390 U.S. 744 SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 1159.
Decided April 29, 1968.
277 F. Supp. 671, affirmed.
Alan C. Furth, Robert L. Pierce, William P. Higgins and G. Clark Cummings for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; Ernest Porter, Dennis McCarthy, E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
U.S. Supreme Court
HOSACK v. SMILEY, 390 U.S. 744 (1968)
390 U.S. 744 HOSACK ET AL. v. SMILEY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
No. 1196.
Decided April 29, 1968.
276 F. Supp. 876, affirmed.
Melvin L. Wulf for appellants.
Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John P. Holloway, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
