US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 392 U.S. 643

U.S. Supreme Court

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

392 U.S. 643

GOLDMAN v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 1261.
Decided June 17, 1968.

21 N. Y. 2d 152, 234 N. E. 2d 194, appeal dismissed.

Robert E. Goldman and Stephen R. Wiener for appellant.

Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.


RHODES v. COOK, <a href="https://chanrobles.com/usa/us_supremecourt/392/643/case.php">392 U.S. 643</A> (1968) 392 U.S. 643 (1968) ">

U.S. Supreme Court

RHODES v. COOK, 392 U.S. 643 (1968)

392 U.S. 643

RHODES v. COOK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1283.
Decided June 17, 1968.

72 Wash. 2d 436, 433 P.2d 677, appeal dismissed.

E. A. Niemeier, Frank A. Bauman, John K. Mallory, Jr., and R. Michael Duncan for appellant.

John F. Wilson for appellee.

Harry R. Calbom, Jr., for Pay'n Pak Stores, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

Page 392 U.S. 643, 644



Full Text of Opinion







chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com