US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 27 (1969)

Subscribe to Cases that cite 396 U.S. 27

U.S. Supreme Court

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 27 (1969)

396 U.S. 27

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
MASSACHUSETTS No. 343.
Decided November 10, 1969*

No. 343, 297 F. Supp. 615; Nos. 480 and 497, 300 F. Supp. 318, affirmed.

[Footnote *] Together with No. 480, Arizona Corporation Commission et al. v. United States et al., and No. 497, Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, for appellants in No. 480. Howard J. Trienens, Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., R. Ames, W. W. Dalton, K. A. Dobbins, J. H. Durkin, N. Melvin, T. A. Miller, A. B. Russ, Jr., R. D. Sickler, E. L. Van Dellen, R. W. Yost, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for appellants in No. 497.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al. in all cases. Hugh B. Cox and William H. Allen for railroad appellees in all cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

Page 396 U.S. 27, 28



Full Text of Opinion







chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com