US SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, v. BRIECK, 488 U.S. 226 (1988)

Subscribe to Cases that cite v. BRIECK, 488 U.S. 226

U.S. Supreme Court

HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, v. BRIECK, 488 U.S. 226 (1988)

488 U.S. 226

HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES, A DIVISION OF DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC. v.
BRIECK
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 87-271.

Argued October 31, 1988
Decided December 12, 1988

822 F.2d 52, dismissed.

Andrew M. Kramer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Erwin N. Griswold, David A. Copus, Patricia A. Dunn, and James P. Hollihan.

Brian J. Martin argued the cause for the United States et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance. On the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Reynolds, Deputy Solicitor General Merrill, Charles A. Rothfeld, and Charles A. Shanor.

James H. Logan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Julius L. Chambers, Charles Stephen Ralston, Ronald L. Ellis, and Eric Schnapper.*

[Footnote *] Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America by John C. Unkovic and Stephen A. Bokat; and for the Equal Employment Advisory Council by Robert E. Williams, Douglas S. McDowell, and Ann Elizabeth Reesman.

Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the American Association of Retired Persons by Alfred Miller, Steven S. Honigman, Christopher G. Mackaronis, and Cathy Ventrell-Monsees; and for the Plaintiff Employment Lawyers Association by Paul H. Tobias.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

JUSTICE WHITE dissents.

Page 488 U.S. 226, 227



Full Text of Opinion







chanrobles.com



ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com