DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. v. BROUDO et al., 544 U.S. ---Subscribe to Cases that cite 03-932
DURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., et al. v. BROUDO et al.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-932.Argued January 12, 2005--Decided April 19, 2005
Respondents filed a securities fraud class action, alleging that petitioners, Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and some of its managers and directors (hereinafter Dura), made, inter alia, misrepresentations about future Food and Drug Administration approval of a new asthmatic spray device, leading respondents to purchase Dura securities at an artificially inflated price. In dismissing, the District Court found that the complaint failed adequately to allege "loss causation"--i.e., a causal connection between the spray device misrepresentation and the economic loss, 15 U. S. C. §78u-4(b)(4). The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that a plaintiff can satisfy the loss causation requirement simply by alleging that a security's price at the time of purchase was inflated because of the misrepresentation.