US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for


Subscribe to Cases that cite 90 U. S. 507 RSS feed for this section

U.S. Supreme Court

Railroad Company v. Wiswall, 90 U.S. 23 Wall. 507 507 (1874)

Railroad Company v. Wiswall

90 U.S. (23 Wall.) 507


The order of a circuit court remanding, for want of jurisdiction to hear it, a case removed from a state court into it is not a "final judgment" in that sense which authorizes a writ of error. The remedy of the party against whose will the suit has been remanded, is by mandamus to compel action, and not by a writ of error to review what has been done.

Wiswall, a citizen of Illinois, sued, in one of the inferior state courts of the state just named, the Chicago & Alton Railroad Company. The company conceiving that the case was properly cognizable in the Circuit Court of the United States for that district -- the Southern District of Illinois -- got an order from that court, the court below, commanding the state court to send the record to it. This the state court did. However, upon looking further into the matter, the circuit court was satisfied that it had no jurisdiction, and on motion of the plaintiff remanded the case to the state court. To that remand the railroad company took a writ of error from this Court, and this writ it was which Wiswall now moved to dismiss, the ground of the motion being that the remand was not a "final" judgment or decree, and that the proper proceeding of the company was a motion for mandamus on the court below [Footnote 1] to act, and not by writ of error to review what was done. chanroblesvirtualawlibrary

Page 90 U. S. 508

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions



Browse By ->> Volume


Browse By ->> Year


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™