US LAWS, STATUTES and CODES : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library USA Supreme Court Decisions | Resolutions : Chan Robles Virtual Law Library

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ |™   
Main Index Repository of Laws, Statutes and Codes Latest Philippine Supreme Court Decisions Chan Robles Virtual Law Library Latest Legal Updates Philippine Legal Resources Significant Philippine Legal Resources Worldwide Legal Resources Philippine Supreme Court Decisions United States Legal Resources United States Supreme Court Jurisprudence ChanRobles LawTube - Social Network

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : DebtKollect Company, Inc. - Debt Collection Firm Intellectual Property Division - Chan Robles Law Firm

ChanRobles™ LawTube

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

google search for chanrobles.comSearch for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions

USA > US Constitution > Trial by Jury in Civil Cases

Trial by Jury in Civil Cases



In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


The Right and the Characteristics of the Civil Jury

History. — On September 12, 1787, as the Convention was in its final stages, Mr. Williamson of North Carolina "observed to the House that no provision was yet made for juries in Civil cases and suggested the necessity of it." The comment elicited some support and the further observation that because of the diversity of practice in civil trials in the States it would be impossible to draft a suitable provision.1 When on September 15 it was moved that a clause be inserted in Article III, 2, to guarantee that "a trial by jury shall be preserved as usual in civil cases," this objection seems to have been the only one urged in opposition and the motion was defeated.2 The omission, however, was cited by many opponents of ratification and "was pressed with an urgency and zeal . . . well-nigh preventing its ratification."3 A guarantee of right to jury in civil cases was one of the amendments urged on Congress by the ratifying conventions4 and it was included from the first among Madison's proposals to the House.5 It does not appear that the text of the proposed amendment or its meaning was debated during its passage.6chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary

1 2 M. FARRAND, RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION OF 1787, at 587 (rev. ed. 1937).

2 Id. at 628.

3 J. STORY, COMMENTARIES ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES 1757 (1833). "[I]t is a most important and valuable amendment; and places upon the high ground of constitutional right the inestimable privilege of a trial by jury in civil cases, a privilege scarcely inferior to that in criminal cases, which is conceded by all to be essential to political and civil liberty." Id. at 1762.

4 J. ELLIOTT, THE DEBATES IN THE SEVERAL STATE CONVENTIONS ON THE ADOPTION OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION 326 (2d ed. 1836) (New Hampshire); 2 id. at 399-414 (New York); 3 id. at 658 (Virginia).

5 1 ANNALS OF CONGRESS 436 (1789). "In suits at common law, between man and man, the trial by jury, as one of the best securities to the rights of the people, ought to remain inviolate."

6 It is simply noted in 1 ANNALS OF CONGRESS 760 (1789), that on August 18 the House "considered and adopted" the committee version: "In suits at common law, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved." On September 7, the SENATE JOURNAL states that this provision was adopted after insertion of "where the consideration exceeds twenty dollars." 2 B. SCHWARTZ, THE BILL OF RIGHTS: A DOCUMENTARY HISTORY 1150 (1971).

Home | US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | per Volume | per Year

ChanRobles™ LawTube

google search for Search for

Supreme Court Decisions Philippine Supreme Court DecisionsUS Supreme Court Decisions


  Copyright © ChanRobles Publishing   Disclaimer   E-mail Restrictions
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library |™