US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 135. —  Statewide planning.

WAIS Document Retrieval



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 23USC135]

 
                           TITLE 23--HIGHWAYS
 
                     CHAPTER 1--FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
 
                    SUBCHAPTER I--GENERAL PROVISIONS
 
Sec. 135. Statewide planning

    (a) General Requirements.--
        (1) Findings.--It is in the national interest to encourage and 
    promote the safe and efficient management, operation, and 
    development of surface transportation systems that will serve the 
    mobility needs of people and freight and foster economic growth and 
    development within and through urbanized areas, while minimizing 
    transportation-related fuel consumption and air pollution.
        (2) Development of plans and programs.--Subject to section 134 
    of this title and sections 5303 through 5305 of title 49, each State 
    shall develop transportation plans and programs for all areas of the 
    State.
        (3) Contents.--The plans and programs for each State shall 
    provide for the development and integrated management and operation 
    of transportation systems and facilities (including pedestrian 
    walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) that will function 
    as an intermodal transportation system for the State and an integral 
    part of an intermodal transportation system for the United States.
        (4) Process of development.--The process for developing the 
    plans and programs shall provide for consideration of all modes of 
    transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and 
    comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of 
    the transportation problems to be addressed.

    (b) Coordination With Metropolitan Planning; State Implementation 
Plan.--In carrying out planning under this section, a State shall 
coordinate such planning with the transportation planning activities 
carried out under section 134 of this title and sections 5303 through 
5305 of title 49 for metropolitan areas of the State and shall carry out 
its responsibilities for the development of the transportation portion 
of the State implementation plan to the extent required by the Clean Air 
Act.
    (c) Scope of Planning Process.--
        (1) In general.--Each State shall carry out a transportation 
    planning process that provides for consideration of projects and 
    strategies that will--
            (A) support the economic vitality of the United States, the 
        States, and metropolitan areas, especially by enabling global 
        competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
            (B) increase the safety and security of the transportation 
        system for motorized and nonmotorized users;
            (C) increase the accessibility and mobility options 
        available to people and for freight;
            (D) protect and enhance the environment, promote energy 
        conservation, and improve quality of life;
            (E) enhance the integration and connectivity of the 
        transportation system, across and between modes throughout the 
        State, for people and freight;
            (F) promote efficient system management and operation; and
            (G) emphasize the preservation of the existing 
        transportation system.

        (2) Failure to consider factors.--The failure to consider any 
    factor specified in paragraph (1) shall not be reviewable by any 
    court under this title, subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, or 
    chapter 7 of title 5 in any matter affecting a transportation plan, 
    a transportation improvement plan, a project or strategy, or the 
    certification of a planning process.

    (d) Additional Requirements.--In carrying out planning under this 
section, each State shall, at a minimum, consider--
        (1) with respect to nonmetropolitan areas, the concerns of local 
    elected officials representing units of general purpose local 
    government;
        (2) the concerns of Indian tribal governments and Federal land 
    management agencies that have jurisdiction over land within the 
    boundaries of the State; and
        (3) coordination of transportation plans, programs, and planning 
    activities with related planning activities being carried out 
    outside of metropolitan planning areas.

    (e) Long-Range Transportation Plan.--
        (1) Development.--Each State shall develop a long-range 
    transportation plan, with a minimum 20-year forecast period, for all 
    areas of the State, that provides for the development and 
    implementation of the intermodal transportation system of the State.
        (2) Consultation with governments.--
            (A) Metropolitan areas.--With respect to each metropolitan 
        area in the State, the long-range transportation plan shall be 
        developed in cooperation with the metropolitan planning 
        organization designated for the metropolitan area under section 
        134 of this title and section 5303 of title 49.
            (B) Nonmetropolitan areas.--With respect to each 
        nonmetropolitan area, the long-range transportation plan shall 
        be developed in consultation with affected local officials with 
        responsibility for transportation.
            (C) Indian tribal areas.--With respect to each area of the 
        State under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribal government, the 
        long-range transportation plan shall be developed in 
        consultation with the tribal government and the Secretary of the 
        Interior.

        (3) Participation by interested parties.--In developing the 
    long-range transportation plan, the State shall--
            (A) provide citizens, affected public agencies, 
        representatives of transportation agency employees, freight 
        shippers, private providers of transportation, representatives 
        of users of public transit, providers of freight transportation 
        services, and other interested parties with a reasonable 
        opportunity to comment on the proposed plan; and
            (B) identify transportation strategies necessary to 
        efficiently serve the mobility needs of people.

        (4) Financial plan.--The long-range transportation plan may 
    include a financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted long-
    range transportation plan can be implemented, indicates resources 
    from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be 
    made available to carry out the plan, and recommends any additional 
    financing strategies for needed projects and programs. The financial 
    plan may include, for illustrative purposes, additional projects 
    that would be included in the adopted transportation plan if 
    reasonable additional resources beyond those identified in the 
    financial plan were available.
        (5) Selection of projects from illustrative list.--
    Notwithstanding paragraph (4), a State shall not be required to 
    select any project from the illustrative list of additional projects 
    included in the financial plan under paragraph (4).

    (f) State Transportation Improvement Program.--
        (1) Development.--
            (A) In general.--Each State shall develop a transportation 
        improvement program for all areas of the State.
            (B) Consultation with governments.--
                (i) Metropolitan areas.--With respect to each 
            metropolitan area in the State, the program shall be 
            developed in cooperation with the metropolitan planning 
            organization designated for the metropolitan area under 
            section 134 of this title and section 5303 of title 49.
                (ii) Nonmetropolitan areas.--
                    (I) In general.--With respect to each 
                nonmetropolitan area in the State, the program shall be 
                developed in consultation with affected local officials 
                with responsibility for transportation.
                    (II) Review.--Not later than 1 year after the date 
                of enactment of this subclause, the State shall submit 
                to the Secretary the details of the consultative 
                planning process developed by the State for 
                nonmetropolitan areas under subclause (I). The Secretary 
                shall not review or approve such process.

                (iii) Indian tribal areas.--With respect to each area of 
            the State under the jurisdiction of an Indian tribal 
            government, the program shall be developed in consultation 
            with the tribal government and the Secretary of the 
            Interior.

            (C) Participation by interested parties.--In developing the 
        program, the Governor shall provide citizens, affected public 
        agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, 
        freight shippers, private providers of transportation, providers 
        of freight transportation services, representatives of users of 
        public transit, and other interested parties with a reasonable 
        opportunity to comment on the proposed program.

        (2) Included projects.--
            (A) In general.--A transportation improvement program 
        developed under this subsection for a State shall include 
        federally supported surface transportation expenditures within 
        the boundaries of the State.
            (B) Chapter 2 projects.--
                (i) Regionally significant projects.--Regionally 
            significant projects proposed for funding under chapter 2 
            shall be identified individually in the transportation 
            improvement program.
                (ii) Other projects.--Projects proposed for funding 
            under chapter 2 that are not determined to be regionally 
            significant shall be grouped in 1 line item or identified 
            individually in the transportation improvement program.

            (C) Consistency with long-range transportation plan.--Each 
        project shall be--
                (i) consistent with the long-range transportation plan 
            developed under this section for the State;
                (ii) identical to the project as described in an 
            approved metropolitan transportation improvement program; 
            and
                (iii) in conformance with the applicable State air 
            quality implementation plan developed under the Clean Air 
            Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.), if the project is carried out 
            in an area designated as nonattainment for ozone or carbon 
            monoxide under such Act.

            (D) Requirement of anticipated full funding.--The program 
        shall include a project, or an identified phase of a project, 
        only if full funding can reasonably be anticipated to be 
        available for the project within the time period contemplated 
        for completion of the project.
            (E) Financial plan.--The transportation improvement program 
        may include a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved 
        transportation improvement program can be implemented, indicates 
        resources from public and private sources that are reasonably 
        expected to be made available to carry out the plan, and 
        recommends any additional financing strategies for needed 
        projects and programs. The financial plan may include, for 
        illustrative purposes, additional projects that would be 
        included in the adopted transportation plan if reasonable 
        additional resources beyond those identified in the financial 
        plan were available.
            (F) Selection of projects from illustrative list.--
                (i) No required selection.--Notwithstanding subparagraph 
            (E), a State shall not be required to select any project 
            from the illustrative list of additional projects included 
            in the financial plan under subparagraph (E).
                (ii) Required action by the secretary.--Action by the 
            Secretary shall be required for a State to select any 
            project from the illustrative list of additional projects 
            included in the financial plan under subparagraph (E) for 
            inclusion in an approved transportation improvement program.

            (G) Priorities.--The program shall reflect the priorities 
        for programming and expenditures of funds, including 
        transportation enhancement activities, required by this title.

        (3) Project selection for areas of less than 50,000 
    population.--
            (A) In general.--Projects carried out in areas with 
        populations of less than 50,000 individuals (excluding projects 
        carried out on the National Highway System and projects carried 
        out under the bridge program or the Interstate maintenance 
        program) shall be selected, from the approved statewide 
        transportation improvement program, by the State in cooperation 
        with the affected local officials.
            (B) National highway system projects.--Projects carried out 
        in areas described in subparagraph (A) on the National Highway 
        System and projects carried out in such areas under the bridge 
        program or the Interstate maintenance program shall be selected, 
        from the approved statewide transportation improvement program, 
        by the State in consultation with the affected local officials.

        (4) Biennial review and approval.--A transportation improvement 
    program developed under this subsection shall be reviewed and, on a 
    finding that the planning process through which the program was 
    developed is consistent with this section, section 134, and sections 
    5303 through 5305 of title 49, approved not less frequently than 
    biennially by the Secretary.
        (5) Modifications to project priority.--Notwithstanding any 
    other provision of law, action by the Secretary shall not be 
    required to advance a project included in the approved statewide 
    transportation improvement program in place of another project in 
    the program.

    (g) Funding.--Funds set aside pursuant to section 505(a) of title 
23, United States Code, shall be available to carry out the requirements 
of this section.
    (h) Treatment of Certain State Laws as Congestion Management 
Systems.--For purposes of this section, section 134, and sections 5303-
5306 and 5323(k) \1\ of title 49, State laws, rules or regulations 
pertaining to congestion management systems or programs may constitute 
the congestion management system under this Act \1\ if the Secretary 
finds that the State laws, rules or regulations are consistent with, and 
fulfill the intent of, the purposes of this section, section 134 or 
sections 5303-5306 and 5323(k),\1\ as appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ See References in Text note below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (i) Continuation of Current Review Practice.--Since plans and 
programs described in this section are subject to a reasonable 
opportunity for public comment, since individual projects included in 
the plans and programs are subject to review under the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and since 
decisions by the Secretary concerning plans and programs described in 
this section have not been reviewed under such Act as of January 1, 
1997, any decision by the Secretary concerning a plan or program 
described in this section shall not be considered to be a Federal action 
subject to review under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

(Added Pub. L. 90-495, Sec. 10(a), Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 820; amended 
Pub. L. 91-605, title I, Secs. 106(g), 125, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 
1718, 1729; Pub. L. 93-87, title I, Sec. 119, Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 
259; Pub. L. 94-280, title I, Sec. 123(a), May 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 439; 
Pub. L. 102-240, title I, Sec. 1025(a), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1962; 
Pub. L. 103-429, Sec. 3(6), Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4378; Pub. L. 105-
178, title I, Sec. 1204(a)-(h), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 180-184.)

                       References in Text

    The Clean Air Act, referred to in subsecs. (b) and (f)(2)(C)(iii), 
is act July 14, 1955, ch. 360, 69 Stat. 322, as amended, which is 
classified generally to chapter 85 (Sec. 7401 et seq.) of Title 42, The 
Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to 
the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of Title 42 
and Tables.
    The date of enactment of this subclause, referred to in subsec. 
(f)(1)(B)(ii)(II), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 105-178, which 
was approved June 9, 1998.
    Section 5323(k) of title 49, referred to in subsec. (h), was 
redesignated section 5323(l) of title 49 and a new section 5323(k) was 
added by Pub. L. 105-178, title III, Sec. 3020(d), June 9, 1998, 112 
Stat. 362.
    This Act, referred to in subsec. (h), probably means Pub. L. 102-
240, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1914, known as the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. For complete classification of 
this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1991 Amendment note set out 
under section 101 of Title 49, Transportation, and Tables.
    The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in 
subsec. (i), is Pub. L. 91-190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, as amended, 
which is classified generally to chapter 55 (Sec. 4321 et seq.) of Title 
42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this 
Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of 
Title 42 and Tables.


                            Prior Provisions

    A prior section 135, Pub. L. 89-139, Sec. 4(a), Aug. 28, 1965, 79 
Stat. 578, called for a highway safety program in each State approved by 
the Secretary, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 89-564, title I, Sec. 102(a), 
Sept. 9, 1966, 80 Stat. 734. See section 402 of this title.


                               Amendments

    1998--Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(a), reenacted heading 
without change and amended text of subsec. (a) generally. Prior to 
amendment, text read as follows: ``It is in the national interest to 
encourage and promote the development of transportation systems 
embracing various modes of transportation in a manner that will serve 
all areas of the State efficiently and effectively. Subject to section 
134 of this title, the State shall develop transportation plans and 
programs for all areas of the State. Such plans and programs shall 
provide for development of transportation facilities (including 
pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) which will 
function as an intermodal State transportation system. The process for 
developing such plans and programs shall provide for consideration of 
all modes of transportation and shall be continuing, cooperative, and 
comprehensive to the degree appropriate, based on the complexity of the 
transportation problems.''
    Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(b), inserted ``and sections 
5303 through 5305 of title 49'' after ``section 134 of this title''.
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(c), amended heading and text 
of subsec. (c) generally, substituting provisions relating to scope of 
planning process for provisions relating to considerations to be 
involved in State's continuous transportation planning process.
    Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(d), reenacted heading 
without change and amended text of subsec. (d) generally. Prior to 
amendment, text read as follows: ``Each State in carrying out planning 
under this section shall, at a minimum, consider the following:
        ``(1) The coordination of transportation plans and programs 
    developed for metropolitan areas of the State under section 134 with 
    the State transportation plans and programs developed under this 
    section and the reconciliation of such plans and programs as 
    necessary to ensure connectivity within transportation systems.
        ``(2) Investment strategies to improve adjoining State and local 
    roads that support rural economic growth and tourism development, 
    Federal agency renewable resources management, and multipurpose land 
    management practices, including recreation development.
        ``(3) The concerns of Indian tribal governments having 
    jurisdiction over lands within the boundaries of the State.''
    Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(e), amended heading and text 
of subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: 
``The State shall develop a long-range transportation plan for all areas 
of the State. With respect to metropolitan areas of the State, the plan 
shall be developed in cooperation with metropolitan planning 
organizations designated for metropolitan areas in the State under 
section 134. With respect to areas of the State under the jurisdiction 
of an Indian tribal government, the plan shall be developed in 
cooperation with such government and the Secretary of the Interior. In 
developing the plan, the State shall provide citizens, affected public 
agencies, representatives of transportation agency employees, other 
affected employee representatives, private providers of transportation, 
and other interested parties with a reasonable opportunity to comment on 
the proposed plan. In addition, the State shall develop a long-range 
plan for bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways for appropriate 
areas of the State which shall be incorporated into the long-range 
transportation plan.''
    Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(f), amended heading and text 
of subsec. (f) generally. Prior to amendment, text related to 
transportation improvement programs, including program development, 
requirement for inclusion of certain projects for State transportation 
improvement program, project selection for areas less than 50,000 
population, and requirement of biennial review and approval.
    Subsec. (g). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(g), which directed 
substitution of ``section 505(a)'' for ``section 307(c)(1)'' in section 
134(g), was executed by making the substitution in subsec. (g) of this 
section to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
    Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 105-178, Sec. 1204(h), added subsec. (i).
    1994--Subsec. (f)(2). Pub. L. 103-429, Sec. 3(6)(A), substituted 
``chapter 53 of title 49'' for ``the Federal Transit Act''.
    Subsec. (h). Pub. L. 103-429, Sec. 3(6)(B), substituted ``sections 
5303-5306 and 5323(k) of title 49'' for ``section 8 of the Federal 
Transit Act, United States Code'' and ``section 8 of such Act''.
    1991--Pub. L. 102-240 substituted section catchline for one which 
read: ``Traffic operations improvement programs'', and amended text 
generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:
    ``(a) The Congress hereby finds and declares it to be in the 
national interest that each State shall have a continuing program 
designed to reduce traffic congestion and facilitate the flow of 
traffic.
    ``(b) The Secretary may approve under this section any project for 
improvements on any public road which project will directly facilitate 
and control traffic flow on any of the Federal-aid systems.''
    1976--Pub. L. 94-280 struck out introductory words ``Urban area'' in 
section catchline.
    Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 94-280 struck out ``within the designated 
boundaries of urban areas of the State'' and ``in the urban areas'' 
after ``continuing program'' and ``flow of traffic'', respectively.
    Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94-280 substituted ``any project for 
improvements on any public road which project will directly facilitate 
and control traffic flow on any of the Federal-aid systems'' for ``any 
project on an extension of the Federal-aid primary or secondary system 
in urban areas and on the Federal-aid urban system for improvements 
which directly facilitate and control traffic flow, such as grade 
separation of intersections, widening of lanes, channelization of 
traffic, traffic control systems, and loading and unloading ramps. If 
such project is located in an urban area of more than fifty thousand 
population, such project shall be based on a continuing comprehensive 
transportation planning process carried on in accordance with section 
134 of this title''.
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 94-280 struck out subsec. (c) which provided 
for an annual report by the Secretary on projects approved under this 
section with recommendations for further improvement of traffic 
operations in accordance with this section.
    1973--Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 93-87 struck out subsec. (c) which 
provided for apportionment of sums authorized to carry out this section 
in accordance with section 104(b)(3) of this title, and redesignated 
subsec. (d) as (c).
    1970--Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 91-605 inserted reference to the Federal-
aid urban system and required that projects under this section be based 
on a continuing comprehensive transportation planning process carried on 
in accordance with section 134 of this title only in urban areas of more 
than fifty thousand population.


                    Effective Date of 1991 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 102-240 effective Dec. 18, 1991, and applicable 
to funds authorized to be appropriated or made available after Sept. 30, 
1991, and, with certain exceptions, not applicable to funds appropriated 
or made available on or before Sept. 30, 1991, see section 1100 of Pub. 
L. 102-240, set out as a note under section 104 of this title.


                             Effective Date

    Section effective Aug. 23, 1968, see section 37 of Pub. L. 90-495, 
set out as an Effective Date of 1968 Amendment note under section 101 of 
this title.


                Participation of Local Elected Officials

    Pub. L. 105-178, title I, Sec. 1204(i), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 184, 
provided that:
    ``(1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study on the 
effectiveness of the participation of local elected officials in 
transportation planning and programming. In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall consider the degree of cooperation between each State, 
local officials in rural areas in the State, and regional planning and 
development organizations in the State.
    ``(2) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act [June 9, 1998], the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the results of the study with any recommendations the 
Secretary determines appropriate as a result of the study.''


             Advanced Travel Forecasting Procedures Program

    Pub. L. 105-178, title I, Sec. 1210, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 187, 
provided that:
    ``(a) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish an advanced 
travel forecasting procedures program--
        ``(1) to provide for completion of the advanced transportation 
    model developed under the Transportation Analysis Simulation System 
    (referred to in this section as `TRANSIMS'); and
        ``(2) to provide support for early deployment of the advanced 
    transportation modeling computer software and graphics package 
    developed under TRANSIMS and the program established under this 
    section to States, local governments, and metropolitan planning 
    organizations with responsibility for travel modeling.
    ``(b) Eligible Activities.--The Secretary shall use funds made 
available under this section to--
        ``(1) provide funding for completion of core development of the 
    advanced transportation model;
        ``(2) develop user-friendly advanced transportation modeling 
    computer software and graphics packages;
        ``(3) provide training and technical assistance with respect to 
    the implementation and application of the advanced transportation 
    model to States, local governments, and metropolitan planning 
    organizations with responsibility for travel modeling; and
        ``(4) allocate funds to not more than 12 entities described in 
    paragraph (3), representing a diversity of populations and 
    geographic regions, for a pilot program to enable transportation 
    management areas designated under section 134(i) of title 23, United 
    States Code, to convert from the use of travel forecasting 
    procedures in use by the areas as of the date of enactment of this 
    Act [June 9, 1998] to the use of the advanced transportation model.
    ``(c) Funding.--
        ``(1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated from 
    the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) to 
    carry out this section $4,000,000 for fiscal year 1998, $3,000,000 
    for fiscal year 1999, $6,500,000 for fiscal year 2000, $5,000,000 
    for fiscal year 2001, $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and 
    $2,500,000 for fiscal year 2003.
        ``(2) Allocation of funds.--
            ``(A) Fiscal years 1998 and 1999.--For each of fiscal years 
        1998 and 1999, 100 percent of the funds made available under 
        paragraph (1) shall be allocated to activities as described in 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (b).
            ``(B) Fiscal years 2000 through 2003.--For each of fiscal 
        years 2000 through 2003, not more than 50 percent of the funds 
        made available under paragraph (1) may be allocated to 
        activities described in subsection (b)(4).
        ``(3) Contract authority.--Funds authorized under this 
    subsection shall be available for obligation in the same manner as 
    if the funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United 
    States Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of--
            ``(A) any activity described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) 
        of subsection (b) shall not exceed 100 percent; and
            ``(B) any activity described in subsection (b)(4) shall not 
        exceed 80 percent.''


      Demonstration Project for Automated Roadway Management System

    Pub. L. 95-599, title I, Sec. 154, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2716, 
provided that:
    ``(a) The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to carry out a 
demonstration project of the use of a sophisticated automated roadway 
management system to increase the capacity and safety of automobile 
travel in high density travel corridors without providing additional 
lanes of pavement. The management system shall coordinate the traffic 
flow in major freeways and arterials servicing the travel corridor by 
use of an integrated system of vehicle sensors to monitor traffic, 
computers to assess traffic conditions throughout the corridor, and 
devices to communicate with drivers, police, and emergency equipment.
    ``(b) There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
section, out of the Highway Trust Fund, not to exceed $1,500,000 for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1979, not to exceed $2,500,000 for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, and not to exceed $26,000,000 for 
the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981.
    ``(c) The Federal share payable on account of any project authorized 
under this section shall not exceed 90 per centum of the total cost 
thereof.
    ``(d) Funds authorized by this section shall be available for 
obligation in the same manner and to the same extent as if such funds 
were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, except 
that the Federal share of the cost of any project under this section 
shall not exceed 90 per centum.''


    Traffic Control Signalization Demonstration Projects; Reports to 
             Secretary of Transportation; Report to Congress

    Section 146 of Pub. L. 94-280 provided that:
    ``(a) The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to carry out 
traffic control signalization demonstration projects designed to 
demonstrate through the use of technology not now in general use the 
increased capacity of existing highways, the conservation of fuel, the 
decrease in traffic congestion, the improvement in air and noise 
quality, and the furtherance of highway safety, giving priority to those 
projects providing coordinated signalization of two or more 
intersections. Such projects can be carried out on any highway whether 
on or off a Federal-aid system.
    ``(b) There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
section of the Highway Trust Fund, not 

	 
	 




























chanrobles.com