US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 941. —  Declaration of policy, Congressional findings and purpose.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 25USC941]

 
                            TITLE 25--INDIANS
 
                        CHAPTER 14--MISCELLANEOUS
 
SUBCHAPTER XLIII-A--CATAWBA INDIAN TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; RESTORATION 
                      OF FEDERAL TRUST RELATIONSHIP
 
Sec. 941. Declaration of policy, Congressional findings and 
        purpose
        

(a) Findings

    The Congress declares and finds that:
        (1) It is the policy of the United States to promote tribal 
    self-determination and economic self-sufficiency and to support the 
    resolution of disputes over historical claims through settlements 
    mutually agreed to by Indian and non-Indian parties.
        (2) There is pending before the United States District Court for 
    the District of South Carolina a lawsuit disputing ownership of 
    approximately 140,000 acres of land in the State of South Carolina 
    and other rights of the Catawba Indian Tribe under Federal law.
        (3) The Catawba Indian Tribe initiated a related lawsuit against 
    the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims 
    seeking monetary damages.
        (4) Some of the significant historical events which have led to 
    the present situation include:
            (A) In treaties with the Crown in 1760 and 1763, the Tribe 
        ceded vast portions of its aboriginal territory in the present 
        States of North and South Carolina in return for guarantees of 
        being quietly settled on a 144,000-acre reservation.
            (B) The Tribe's district court suit contended that in 1840 
        the Tribe and the State entered into an agreement without 
        Federal approval or participation whereby the Tribe ceded its 
        treaty reservation to the State, thereby giving rise to the 
        Tribe's claim that it was dispossessed of its lands in violation 
        of Federal law.
            (C) In 1943, the United States entered into an agreement 
        with the Tribe and the State to provide services to the Tribe 
        and its members. The State purchased 3,434 acres of land and 
        conveyed it to the Secretary in trust for the Tribe and the 
        Tribe organized under the Indian Reorganization Act [25 U.S.C. 
        461 et seq.].
            (D) In 1959, when Congress enacted the Catawba Tribe of 
        South Carolina Division of Assets Act (25 U.S.C. 931-938), 
        Federal agents assured the Tribe that if the Tribe would release 
        the Government from its obligation under the 1943 agreement and 
        agree to Federal legislation terminating the Federal trust 
        relationship and liquidating the 1943 reservation, the status of 
        the Tribe's land claim would not be jeopardized by termination.
            (E) In 1980, the Tribe initiated Federal court litigation to 
        regain possession of its treaty lands and in 1986, the United 
        States Supreme Court ruled in South Carolina against Catawba 
        Indian Tribe that the 1959 Act resulted in the application of 
        State statutes of limitations to the Tribe's land claim. Two 
        subsequent decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for 
        the Fourth Circuit have held that some portion of the Tribe's 
        claim is barred by State statutes of limitations and that some 
        portion is not barred.

        (5) The pendency of these lawsuits has led to substantial 
    economic and social hardship for a large number of landowners, 
    citizens and communities in the State of South Carolina, including 
    the Catawba Indian Tribe. Congress recognizes that if these claims 
    are not resolved, further litigation against tens of thousands of 
    landowners would be likely; that any final resolution of pending 
    disputes through a process of litigation would take many years and 
    entail great expenses to all parties; continue economically and 
    socially damaging controversies; prolong uncertainty as to the 
    ownership of property; and seriously impair long-term economic 
    planning and development for all parties.
        (6) The 102d Congress has enacted legislation suspending until 
    October 1, 1993, the running of any unexpired statute of limitation 
    applicable to the Tribe's land claim in order to provide additional 
    time to negotiate settlement of these claims.
        (7) It is recognized that both Indian and non-Indian parties 
    enter into this settlement to resolve the disputes raised in these 
    lawsuits and to derive certain benefits. The parties' Settlement 
    Agreement constitutes a good faith effort to resolve these lawsuits 
    and other claims and requires implementing legislation by the 
    Congress of the United States, the General Assembly of the State of 
    South Carolina, and the governing bodies of the South Carolina 
    counties of York and Lancaster.
        (8) To advance the goals of the Federal policy of Indian self-
    determination and restoration of terminated Indian Tribes, and in 
    recognition of the United States obligation to the Tribe and the 
    Federal policy of settling historical Indian claims through 
    comprehensive settlement agreements, it is appropriate that the 
    United States participate in the funding and implementation of the 
    Settlement Agreement.

(b) Purpose

    It is the purpose of this subchapter--
        (1) to approve, ratify, and confirm the Settlement Agreement 
    entered into by the non-Indian settlement parties and the Tribe, 
    except as otherwise provided by this subchapter;
        (2) to authorize and direct the Secretary to implement the terms 
    of such Settlement Agreement;
        (3) to authorize the actions and appropriations necessary to 
    implement the provisions of the Settlement Agreement and this 
    subchapter;
        (4) to remove the cloud on titles in the State of South Carolina 
    resulting from the Tribe's land claim; and
        (5) to restore the trust relationship between the Tribe and the 
    United States.

(Pub. L. 103-116, Sec. 2, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1118.)

                       References in Text

    The Indian Reorganization Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(4)(C), is 
act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, as amended, which is 
classified generally to subchapter V (Sec. 461 et seq.) of this chapter. 
For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title 
note set out under section 461 of this title and Tables.
    The Catawba Tribe of South Carolina Division of Assets Act and the 
1959 Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(4)(D), (E), probably mean Pub. L. 
86-322, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 592, which was classified generally to 
subchapter XLIII (Sec. 931 et seq.) of this chapter prior to repeal by 
Pub. L. 103-116, Sec. 4(c), Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1121.
    Legislation suspending until October 1, 1993, the running of any 
unexpired statute of limitation applicable to the Tribe's land claim, 
referred to in subsec. (a)(6), is Pub. L. 102-339, Sec. 3, Aug. 11, 
1992, 106 Stat. 869, which is not classified to the Code.
    This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original 
``this Act'', meaning Pub. L. 103-116, Oct. 27, 1993, 107 Stat. 1118, 
known as the Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina Land Claims 
Settlement Act of 1993, which is classified generally to this 
subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see 
Short Title note set out below and Tables.


                             Effective Date

    Section 17 of Pub. L. 103-116 provided that: ``Except for sections 
7, 8, and 12 [enacting sections 941e, 941f and 941j of this title], the 
provisions of this Act [see Short Title note below] shall become 
effective upon the transfer of the Existing Reservation under section 12 
[enacting section 941j of this title] to the Secretary.''
    [In accordance with the provisions of Pub. L. 103-116, a quitclaim 
deed transferring the existing reservation to the United States as 
Trustee for the Tribe was executed on Nov. 29, 1993. This conveyance was 
accepted on behalf of the United States, in trust, on Jan. 19, 1994. The 
deed was recorded Jan. 20, 1994.]


                               Short Title

    Section 1 of Pub. L. 103-116 provided that: ``This Act [enacting 
this subchapter and repealing subchapter XLIII (Sec. 931 et seq.) of 
this chapter] may be cited as the `Catawba Indian Tribe of South 
Carolina Land Claims Settlement Act of 1993'.''



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com