US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 956. —  Claims against allotments.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 25USC956]

 
                            TITLE 25--INDIANS
 
                        CHAPTER 14--MISCELLANEOUS
 
SUBCHAPTER XLIV--AGUA CALIENTE (PALM SPRINGS) RESERVATION OF CALIFORNIA: 
                       EQUALIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS
 
Sec. 956. Claims against allotments


(a) Assignment, sale, hypothecation, attachment or levy void unless 
        approved

    Equalization allotments made pursuant to this subchapter shall not 
be subject to assignment, sale, or hypothecation or to any attachment or 
levy for claims or debts created before or after September 21, 1959, 
without the written approval of the Secretary, and any such assignment, 
sale, hypothecation, attachment, or levy that has not been so approved 
by the Secretary shall be absolutely null and void.

(b) Liens and lis pendens; legal services

    No equalization allotment made pursuant to this subchapter, and no 
basic allotment made prior to this Act, shall be subject to an equitable 
charging lien or other charge or lien or enforced sale for any advantage 
or benefit which the allottee has received or will receive under or as a 
consequence of enactment of this subchapter, nor shall any lis pendens 
heretofore or hereafter filed upon such lands while in a restricted 
status be of any effect or constitute notice of any action. Whoever 
directly or indirectly accepts or receives any money or other form of 
compensation for legal services in connection with such restricted lands 
from any person who has not expressly employed him as his attorney shall 
be liable, in a civil action brought by the payor or his heirs or 
devisees or by the United States on his behalf, for twice the amount so 
accepted or received unless, prior to the time of acceptance or receipt 
of said compensation, the right to such compensation has been determined 
and the amount thereof fixed by a formal order of the Federal court 
having jurisdiction to make such order. Nothing herein provided shall be 
construed to prevent any attorney from petitioning the Federal court 
having jurisdiction to fix and determine the fees to which he is 
entitled and to pursue and enforce payment thereof in any lawful manner 
after the court has made such order.

(Pub. L. 86-339, Sec. 6, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 604.)

                       References in Text

    The words ``prior to this Act'', referred to in subsec. (b), mean 
prior to enactment of Act Sept. 21, 1959, Pub. L. 86-339.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com