US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 2671. —  Definitions.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 28USC2671]

 
               TITLE 28--JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
 
                     PART VI--PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS
 
                   CHAPTER 171--TORT CLAIMS PROCEDURE
 
Sec. 2671. Definitions

    As used in this chapter and sections 1346(b) and 2401(b) of this 
title, the term ``Federal agency'' includes the executive departments, 
the judicial and legislative branches, the military departments, 
independent establishments of the United States, and corporations 
primarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United States, 
but does not include any contractor with the United States.
    ``Employee of the government'' includes (1) officers or employees of 
any federal agency, members of the military or naval forces of the 
United States, members of the National Guard while engaged in training 
or duty under section 115, 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32, and 
persons acting on behalf of a federal agency in an official capacity, 
temporarily or permanently in the service of the United States, whether 
with or without compensation, and (2) any officer or employee of a 
Federal public defender organization, except when such officer or 
employee performs professional services in the course of providing 
representation under section 3006A of title 18.
    ``Acting within the scope of his office or employment'', in the case 
of a member of the military or naval forces of the United States or a 
member of the National Guard as defined in section 101(3) of title 32, 
means acting in line of duty.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 982; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, Sec. 124, 
63 Stat. 106; Pub. L. 89-506, Sec. 8, July 18, 1966, 80 Stat. 307; Pub. 
L. 97-124, Sec. 1, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1666; Pub. L. 100-694, 
Sec. 3, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4564; Pub. L. 106-398, Sec. 1 [[div. 
A], title VI, Sec. 665(b)], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A-169; 
Pub. L. 106-518, title IV, Sec. 401, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2421.)


                      Historical and Revision Notes

                            1948 Act

    Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Sec. 941 (Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 
753, Sec. 402, 60 Stat. 842).
    Changes were made in phraseology.

                            1949 Act

    This section corrects a typographical error in section 2671 of title 
28, U.S.C.


                               Amendments

    2000--Pub. L. 106-518, in par. defining ``Employee of the 
government'', inserted ``(1)'' after ``includes'' and added cl. (2).
    Pub. L. 106-398 inserted ``115,'' after ``members of the National 
Guard while engaged in training or duty under section'' in par. defining 
``Employee of the government''.
    1988--Pub. L. 100-694 inserted ``the judicial and legislative 
branches,'' after ``departments,'' in first par.
    1981--Pub. L. 97-124 inserted ``members of the National Guard while 
engaged in training or duty under section 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of 
title 32,'' in definition of ``Employee of the government'' and ``or a 
member of the National Guard as defined in section 101(3) of title 32'' 
in definition of ``Acting within the scope of his office or 
employment''.
    1966--Pub. L. 89-506 expanded definition of ``Federal agency'' to 
include military departments.
    1949--Act May 24, 1949, corrected spelling of ``office''.


                    Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

    Pub. L. 106-398, Sec. 1 [[div. A], title VI, Sec. 665(c)(2)], Oct. 
30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A-169, provided that: ``The amendment made 
by subsection (b) [amending this section] shall apply with respect to 
acts and omissions occurring before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act [Oct. 30, 2000].''


                    Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 100-694 effective Nov. 18, 1988, and applicable 
to all claims, civil actions, and proceedings pending on, or filed on or 
after, Nov. 18, 1988, see section 8 of Pub. L. 100-694, set out as a 
note under section 2679 of this title.


                    Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 97-124 applicable only with respect to claims 
arising on or after Dec. 29, 1981, see section 4 of Pub. L. 97-124, set 
out as a note under section 1089 of Title 10, Armed Forces.


                    Effective Date of 1966 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 89-506 applicable to claims accruing six months 
or more after July 18, 1966, see section 10 of Pub. L. 89-506, set out 
as a note under section 2672 of this title.


                              Severability

    Section 7 of Pub. L. 100-694 provided that: ``If any provision of 
this Act [see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note under section 1 of this 
title] or the amendments made by this Act or the application of the 
provision to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder 
of this Act and such amendments and the application of the provision to 
any other person or circumstance shall not be affected by that 
invalidation.''


   Law Enforcement Officer Acting Within Scope of Office or Employment

    Pub. L. 105-277, div. A, Sec. 101(h) [title VI, Sec. 627], Oct. 21, 
1998, 112 Stat. 2681-480, 2681-519, as amended by Pub. L. 106-58, title 
VI, Sec. 623, Sept. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 471, provided that:
    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section--
        ``(1) the term `crime of violence' has the meaning given that 
    term in section 16 of title 18, United States Code; and
        ``(2) the term `law enforcement officer' means any employee 
    described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of section 8401(17) of 
    title 5, United States Code; and any special agent in the Diplomatic 
    Security Service of the Department of State.
    ``(b) Rule of Construction.--Effective on the date of the enactment 
of this Act [Oct. 21, 1998] and thereafter, and notwithstanding any 
other provision of law, for purposes of chapter 171 of title 28, United 
States Code, or any other provision of law relating to tort liability, a 
law enforcement officer shall be construed to be acting within the scope 
of his or her office or employment, if the officer takes reasonable 
action, including the use of force, to--
        ``(1) protect an individual in the presence of the officer from 
    a crime of violence;
        ``(2) provide immediate assistance to an individual who has 
    suffered or who is threatened with bodily harm; or
        ``(3) prevent the escape of any individual who the officer 
    reasonably believes to have committed in the presence of the officer 
    a crime of violence.''


                   Congressional Findings and Purposes

    Section 2 of Pub. L. 100-694 provided that:
    ``(a) Findings.--The Congress finds and declares the following:
        ``(1) For more than 40 years the Federal Tort Claims Act [28 
    U.S.C. 1346(b), 2671 et seq.] has been the legal mechanism for 
    compensating persons injured by negligent or wrongful acts of 
    Federal employees committed within the scope of their employment.
        ``(2) The United States, through the Federal Tort Claims Act, is 
    responsible to injured persons for the common law torts of its 
    employees in the same manner in which the common law historically 
    has recognized the responsibility of an employer for torts committed 
    by its employees within the scope of their employment.
        ``(3) Because Federal employees for many years have been 
    protected from personal common law tort liability by a broad based 
    immunity, the Federal Tort Claims Act has served as the sole means 
    for compensating persons injured by the tortious conduct of Federal 
    employees.
        ``(4) Recent judicial decisions, and particularly the decision 
    of the United States Supreme Court in Westfall v. Erwin, have 
    seriously eroded the common law tort immunity previously available 
    to Federal employees.
        ``(5) This erosion of immunity of Federal employees from common 
    law tort liability has created an immediate crisis involving the 
    prospect of personal liability and the threat of protracted personal 
    tort litigation for the entire Federal workforce.
        ``(6) The prospect of such liability will seriously undermine 
    the morale and well being of Federal employees, impede the ability 
    of agencies to carry out their missions, and diminish the vitality 
    of the Federal Tort Claims Act as the proper remedy for Federal 
    employee torts.
        ``(7) In its opinion in Westfall v. Erwin, the Supreme Court 
    indicated that the Congress is in the best position to determine the 
    extent to which Federal employees should be personally liable for 
    common law torts, and that legislative consideration of this matter 
    would be useful.
    ``(b) Purpose.--It is the purpose of this Act [see Short Title of 
1988 Amendment note under section 1 of this title] to protect Federal 
employees from personal liability for common law torts committed within 
the scope of their employment, while providing persons injured by the 
common law torts of Federal employees with an appropriate remedy against 
the United States.''

                  Section Referred to in Other Sections

    This section is referred to in title 5 section 8477; title 8 section 
1357; title 16 section 4604; title 20 section 4420; title 25 section 
450f; title 42 sections 7142c, 12555n.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com