US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 146. —  Civil action in case of interference.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 35USC146]

 
                            TITLE 35--PATENTS
 
        PART II--PATENTABILITY OF INVENTIONS AND GRANT OF PATENTS
 
       CHAPTER 13--REVIEW OF PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE DECISIONS
 
Sec. 146. Civil action in case of interference

    Any party to an interference dissatisfied with the decision of the 
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on the interference, may have 
remedy by civil action, if commenced within such time after such 
decision, not less than sixty days, as the Director appoints or as 
provided in section 141 of this title, unless he has appealed to the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and such appeal 
is pending or has been decided. In such suits the record in the Patent 
and Trademark Office shall be admitted on motion of either party upon 
the terms and conditions as to costs, expenses, and the further cross-
examination of the witnesses as the court imposes, without prejudice to 
the right of the parties to take further testimony. The testimony and 
exhibits of the record in the Patent and Trademark Office when admitted 
shall have the same effect as if originally taken and produced in the 
suit.
    Such suit may be instituted against the party in interest as shown 
by the records of the Patent and Trademark Office at the time of the 
decision complained of, but any party in interest may become a party to 
the action. If there be adverse parties residing in a plurality of 
districts not embraced within the same state, or an adverse party 
residing in a foreign country, the United States District Court for the 
District of Columbia shall have jurisdiction and may issue summons 
against the adverse parties directed to the marshal of any district in 
which any adverse party resides. Summons against adverse parties 
residing in foreign countries may be served by publication or otherwise 
as the court directs. The Director shall not be a necessary party but he 
shall be notified of the filing of the suit by the clerk of the court in 
which it is filed and shall have the right to intervene. Judgment of the 
court in favor of the right of an applicant to a patent shall authorize 
the Director to issue such patent on the filing in the Patent and 
Trademark Office of a certified copy of the judgment and on compliance 
with the requirements of law.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 803; Pub. L. 93-596, Sec. 1, Jan. 2, 
1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 97-164, title I, Sec. 163(a)(7), Apr. 2, 
1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 98-622, title II, Sec. 203(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 
98 Stat. 3387; Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, 
Sec. 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-582; Pub. L. 
107-273, div. C, title III, Sec. 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 
1906.)


                      Historical and Revision Notes

    The first paragraph and parts of the second paragraph are based on 
Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 63 (R.S. 4915, amended (1) Mar. 2, 
1927, ch. 273, Sec. 11, 44 Stat. 1336, (2) Mar. 2, 1929, ch. 488, 
Sec. 2(b), 45 Stat. 1476, (3) Aug. 5, 1939, ch. 451, Sec. 4, 53 Stat. 
1212), limited to interferences and making some changes. The action is 
not restricted to applicants, but a patentee may also bring the action. 
The time for bringing the action is made the same as for appeals.
    In the second paragraph the first sentence is new and eliminates 
difficulties arising from unrecorded interests.
    The second sentence is based on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., Sec. 72a 
(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 364, 44 Stat. 1394, reenacted Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, 
Sec. 53a, 65 Stat. 728) with changes in language.
    The fourth sentence is new and prevents such suits from being filed 
against the Commissioner as a defendant; however, the Commissioner has 
the right to intervene.
    Language is changed.


                               Amendments

    2002--Pub. L. 107-273 made technical correction to directory 
language of Pub. L. 106-113. See 1999 Amendment note below.
    1999--Pub. L. 106-113, as amended by Pub. L. 107-273, substituted 
``Director'' for ``Commissioner'' wherever appearing.
    1984--Pub. L. 98-622 substituted ``Board of Patent Appeals and 
Interferences on the interference'' for ``board of patent interference 
on the question of priority''.
    1982--Pub. L. 97-164 substituted ``Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit'' for ``Court of Customs and Patent Appeals''.
    1975--Pub. L. 93-596 substituted ``Patent and Trademark Office'' for 
``Patent Office'' wherever appearing.


                    Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 106-113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, 
see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, Sec. 4731] of Pub. L. 106-113, set out 
as a note under section 1 of this title.


                    Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 98-622 effective three months after Nov. 8, 
1984, see section 207 of Pub. L. 98-622, set out as a note under section 
41 of this title.


                    Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 97-164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 
of Pub. L. 97-164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, 
Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.


                    Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

    Amendment by Pub. L. 93-596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of 
Pub. L. 93-596, set out as a note under section 1111 of Title 15, 
Commerce and Trade.

                  Section Referred to in Other Sections

    This section is referred to in sections 141, 154, 291 of this title; 
title 28 section 1295.



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com