US LAWS, STATUTES & CODES ON-LINE

US Supreme Court Decisions On-Line | US Laws



§ 273. —  Defense to infringement based on earlier inventor.



[Laws in effect as of January 24, 2002]
[Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between
  January 24, 2002 and December 19, 2002]
[CITE: 35USC273]

 
                            TITLE 35--PATENTS
 
            PART III--PATENTS AND PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS
 
                   CHAPTER 28--INFRINGEMENT OF PATENTS
 
Sec. 273. Defense to infringement based on earlier inventor

    (a) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
        (1) the terms ``commercially used'' and ``commercial use'' mean 
    use of a method in the United States, so long as such use is in 
    connection with an internal commercial use or an actual arm's-length 
    sale or other arm's-length commercial transfer of a useful end 
    result, whether or not the subject matter at issue is accessible to 
    or otherwise known to the public, except that the subject matter for 
    which commercial marketing or use is subject to a premarketing 
    regulatory review period during which the safety or efficacy of the 
    subject matter is established, including any period specified in 
    section 156(g), shall be deemed ``commercially used'' and in 
    ``commercial use'' during such regulatory review period;
        (2) in the case of activities performed by a nonprofit research 
    laboratory, or nonprofit entity such as a university, research 
    center, or hospital, a use for which the public is the intended 
    beneficiary shall be considered to be a use described in paragraph 
    (1), except that the use--
            (A) may be asserted as a defense under this section only for 
        continued use by and in the laboratory or nonprofit entity; and
            (B) may not be asserted as a defense with respect to any 
        subsequent commercialization or use outside such laboratory or 
        nonprofit entity;

        (3) the term ``method'' means a method of doing or conducting 
    business; and
        (4) the ``effective filing date'' of a patent is the earlier of 
    the actual filing date of the application for the patent or the 
    filing date of any earlier United States, foreign, or international 
    application to which the subject matter at issue is entitled under 
    section 119, 120, or 365 of this title.

    (b) Defense to Infringement.--
        (1) In general.--It shall be a defense to an action for 
    infringement under section 271 of this title with respect to any 
    subject matter that would otherwise infringe one or more claims for 
    a method in the patent being asserted against a person, if such 
    person had, acting in good faith, actually reduced the subject 
    matter to practice at least 1 year before the effective filing date 
    of such patent, and commercially used the subject matter before the 
    effective filing date of such patent.
        (2) Exhaustion of right.--The sale or other disposition of a 
    useful end product produced by a patented method, by a person 
    entitled to assert a defense under this section with respect to that 
    useful end result shall exhaust the patent owner's rights under the 
    patent to the extent such rights would have been exhausted had such 
    sale or other disposition been made by the patent owner.
        (3) Limitations and qualifications of defense.--The defense to 
    infringement under this section is subject to the following:
            (A) Patent.--A person may not assert the defense under this 
        section unless the invention for which the defense is asserted 
        is for a method.
            (B) Derivation.--A person may not assert the defense under 
        this section if the subject matter on which the defense is based 
        was derived from the patentee or persons in privity with the 
        patentee.
            (C) Not a general license.--The defense asserted by a person 
        under this section is not a general license under all claims of 
        the patent at issue, but extends only to the specific subject 
        matter claimed in the patent with respect to which the person 
        can assert a defense under this chapter, except that the defense 
        shall also extend to variations in the quantity or volume of use 
        of the claimed subject matter, and to improvements in the 
        claimed subject matter that do not infringe additional 
        specifically claimed subject matter of the patent.

        (4) Burden of proof.--A person asserting the defense under this 
    section shall have the burden of establishing the defense by clear 
    and convincing evidence.
        (5) Abandonment of use.--A person who has abandoned commercial 
    use of subject matter may not rely on activities performed before 
    the date of such abandonment in establishing a defense under this 
    section with respect to actions taken after the date of such 
    abandonment.
        (6) Personal defense.--The defense under this section may be 
    asserted only by the person who performed the acts necessary to 
    establish the defense and, except for any transfer to the patent 
    owner, the right to assert the defense shall not be licensed or 
    assigned or transferred to another person except as an ancillary and 
    subordinate part of a good faith assignment or transfer for other 
    reasons of the entire enterprise or line of business to which the 
    defense relates.
        (7) Limitation on sites.--A defense under this section, when 
    acquired as part of a good faith assignment or transfer of an entire 
    enterprise or line of business to which the defense relates, may 
    only be asserted for uses at sites where the subject matter that 
    would otherwise infringe one or more of the claims is in use before 
    the later of the effective filing date of the patent or the date of 
    the assignment or transfer of such enterprise or line of business.
        (8) Unsuccessful assertion of defense.--If the defense under 
    this section is pleaded by a person who is found to infringe the 
    patent and who subsequently fails to demonstrate a reasonable basis 
    for asserting the defense, the court shall find the case exceptional 
    for the purpose of awarding attorney fees under section 285 of this 
    title.
        (9) Invalidity.--A patent shall not be deemed to be invalid 
    under section 102 or 103 of this title solely because a defense is 
    raised or established under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, 
Sec. 4302(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-555.)


                             Effective Date

    Pub. L. 106-113, div. B, Sec. 1000(a)(9) [title IV, subtitle C, 
Sec. 4303], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A-557, provided that: 
``This subtitle [enacting this section and provisions set out as a note 
under section 1 of this title] and the amendments made by this subtitle 
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Nov. 29, 
1999], but shall not apply to any action for infringement that is 
pending on such date of enactment or with respect to any subject matter 
for which an adjudication of infringement, including a consent judgment, 
has been made before such date of enactment.''



chanrobles.com.Com


ChanRobles Legal Resources:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com