Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1903 > April 1903 Decisions > G.R. No. 1139 April 8, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. LEANDRO DIAZ, ET AL.

002 Phil 124:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 1139. April 8, 1903. ]

THE UNITED STATES, Complainant-Appellee, v. LEANDRO DIAZ, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Jose M. Arroyo for Appellants.

Solicitor-General Araneta for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; BRIGANDAGE. — Act No. 518 of the Philippine Commission is not retroactive, and one who accepts an office in a revolutionary organization prior to its passage does not become guilty thereunder by such acceptance.


D E C I S I O N


TORRES, J. :


The provincial fiscal in his complaint, dated the 29th of November, 1902, charges the defendants with being brigands, because Diaz knowingly accepted the office of vice-president, Pioson the office of captain, and Leongsong that of lieutenant, under appointments made by the brigands, whom they were doubtless assisting, without the knowledge of the authorities and against the provisions of Act No. 518.

The defendants plead not guilty. As evidence against Diaz the prosecution introduced a statement made by him before Mr. Ira Keithley, inspector of Constabulary, and other witness. This statement is written in Tagalog and appears on page 5 of the record. It is dated the 27th of November, 1902, and signed by Leandro Diaz Translated it is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"Leandro Diaz, domiciled in the town of Tambolong, states that he is the vice-president of the new K.K.K and accepted the said office a little less than one Month ago on account of his fear of the ladrones, adding that the person who acts as president is one Gregorio Suarez, and that since they received the official appointment they have not held any meetings."cralaw virtua1aw library

Both Major Keithley and Inspector McIlvaine, and the policemen Vicente Domingo and Francisco Martinez, testified that they heard the statements made by Leandro Diaz, which do not show that the accused was a member of any band of brigands, or what was the true purpose of the K.K.K association of which he was vice-president. It may be said, judging from the result of other cases referred to by the prosecuting attorney, that this society had for its purpose the preparation of a new revolution against the Government of the United States in these Islands.

Act No. 518 was passed on November 12, 1902. As this act is not retroactive it can not be applied to those engaged in brigand age prior to that date, and if, as Diaz confessed on November 27, 1902, he accepted the office of vice-president a little less than a month before, and regarding this statement, the only evidence against hint, as true, it follows that his appointment was prior in date to the law referred to, and the crime committed was therefore subject at that time to the provisions of the Penal Code.

The record contains no evidence to show that Leandro Diaz was a member of a band of brigands engaged or about to engage in acts prohibited and punished by said Act No 518. He can not, therefore, be found guilty of the crime of brigandage, and, in our judgment, must be acquitted, as were the other defendants, Pioson and Leongsong.

Therefore, for the reasons stated, we are of the opinion that the judgment of the court below with respect to the appellant Leandro Diaz should he reversed and the latter acquitted, with the costs of both instances de oficio. Upon the filing of an information for the crime of insurrection, sedition, and conspiracy, defined and punished by Act No. 292, the judge will take action against the three defendants in accordance with the law. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Cooper, Willard, Mapa and Ladd, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






April-1903 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 1041 April 2, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. RICARDO LUCIANO

    002 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 958 April 3, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN BABASA

    002 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. 1024 April 3, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. TIMOTEO CANDELARIA, ET AL.

    002 Phil 104

  • G.R. No. 1141 April 4, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. ELENO LIUANAG, ET AL.

    002 Phil 107

  • G.R. No. 1098 April 6, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. LICERIO MENDOZA

    002 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 1129 April 6, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. RAFAEL ARCIGA, ET AL.

    002 Phil 110

  • G.R. No. 1086 April 7, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE REGIS

    002 Phil 113

  • G.R. No. 1013 April 8, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. SIMPLICIO SENSANO

    002 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. 1139 April 8, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. LEANDRO DIAZ, ET AL.

    002 Phil 124

  • G.R. No. 1185 April 8, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. VENTURA BETIONG

    002 Phil 126

  • G.R. No. 1106 April 15, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. AGUEDO DEL ROSARIO, ET AL.

    002 Phil 127

  • G.R. No. 1113 April 15, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO ABUAN, ET AL.

    002 Phil 130

  • G.R. No. 448 April 17, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. PHILIP K. SWEET

    002 Phil 131

  • G.R. No. 1150 April 18, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. ANGEL DE VILLA, ET AL.

    002 Phil 133

  • G.R. No. 1240 April 18, 1903 - FRANCISCO ENRIQUEZ v. BYRON AMBLER

    002 Phil 137

  • G.R. No. 1244 April 18, 1903 - LA COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS v. MIGUEL TUPIÑO, ET AL.

    002 Phil 142

  • G.R. No. 1265 April 18, 1903 - EVARISTO PAYNAGA v. GEORGE N. WOLFE

    002 Phil 146

  • G.R. No. 1138 April 20, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. DAMIAN DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    002 Phil 148

  • G.R. No. 573 April 21, 1903 - LA JUNTA ADMINISTRADORA DE OBRAS PIAS v. RICARDO REGIDOR, ET AL.

    002 Phil 151

  • G.R. No. 1131 April 23, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. NICASIO SEVILLA

    002 Phil 162

  • G.R. No. 1143 April 23, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. MARINO BALBOA, ET AL.

    002 Phil 165

  • G.R. No. 957 April 25, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. FERNANDO VEGA, ET AL.

    002 Phil 167

  • G.R. No. 584 April 27, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO PEREZ, ET AL.

    002 Phil 171

  • G.R. No. 1126 April 28, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. HERMOGENES MUYOT

    002 Phil 177

  • G.R. No. 1127 April 28, 1903 - UNITED STATES v. BIAN JENG

    002 Phil 179

  • G.R. No. 1128 April 29, 1903 - CHIYE MAGATINGE v. LA ELECTRICISTA

    002 Phil 182