Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1911 > August 1911 Decisions > G.R. No. 6201 August 12, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. SEVERO DE UNGRIA

019 Phil 518:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 6201. August 12, 1911.]

THE UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SEVERO DE UNGRIA, Defendant-Appellant.

Silvestre Apacible, for Appellant.

Euloqio Ricafort, for Private Prosecutor.

SYLLABUS


1. SEDUCTION; CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE; FORMAL COMPLAINT BY INJURED PARTY. —In proceedings for the prosecution of the crime of seduction, committed before Act No. 1773 went into effect, it is absolutely necessary that a formal complaint, not a mere accusation or denuncia, be presented by the injured party or by one of her legal representatives enumerated in article 448 of the Penal Code.


D E C I S I O N


MAPA, J.:


The defendant herein was sentenced in first instance to four months of arresto mayor, with the accessory penalties provided by law, for the crime of seduction, and appealed from that judgment to this court.

The offended person reported the crime to the justice of the peace of Morong, and the consequent preliminary investigation was accordingly held. As a result thereof, the provincial fiscal, and not the offended person, drew up the formal complaint that served as the basis for the trial and the consequent judgment in the Court of First Instance. According to the charge of the injured person and the fiscal’s complaint, and as was distinctly shown during the hearing, the criminal act occurred within the period between the. years 1904 and 1906.

Had a formal complaint been presented by the offended person, the proceedings instituted and carried on by the fiscal in the Court of First Instance would have been entirely correct, if the cause fell within the scope of Act No. 1773, which was apparently the law taken into consideration by both the court and the fiscal in handling the case. Under that Act, the accusation of the offended person is sufficient for instituting proceedings for the crime of seduction; it is unnecessary for her to present a formal complaint, the fiscal and the courts being left unhampered to prosecute and punish the crime upon the mere accusation by the injured person or her legal representatives. But this Act was passed and went into effect on October 11, 1907, and cannot therefore be applied to the crime here on trial, which was committed long before that date, that is, between the years 1904 and 1906, as stated above.

The law applicable to this case is article 448 of the Penal Code, which prescribes literally that "criminal proceedings for seduction can only be instituted on the complaint (instancia) of the offended person or her parents, grandparents or guardian."cralaw virtua1aw library

In the terminology of the code the word instancia, used in the passage just quoted, is equivalent to charge or complaint which, as is known, means or is more than a mere accusation (denuncia). In his work entitled "El Codigo Penal," Pacheco comments as follows on this passage:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"In the crime of seduction it is necessary that the formal complaint be made by the injured person, or her guardian, parents, or grandparents. No other person is admissible. It is necessary that those who are admissible file a charge, a formal accusation, a complaint. It is not sufficient that they accuse, that they make report. The law requires more, employing the strongest word . . . In seduction there must be a complaint filed by the offended person, her parents, her grandparents, or her guardian." [Vol. III, p. 154.]

Commenting on the same provision, Viada says that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It provides that criminal proceedings arising from the crime of seduction . . . can only be instituted by the persons concerned (the seduced, her parents, grandparents, or guardian). From this it is inferred (he adds) that the aforesaid persons, to the exclusion of everyone else, even the state prosecutors, are the only ones who can institute the proper proceedings for investigating the crime of seduction; and, moreover, a mere accusation (denuncia) to the judicial authorities will not suffice, but it is necessary that they institute the criminal procedure provided for the crime by means of the consequent charge or formal complaint (instancia 6 querella)."cralaw virtua1aw library

It is, then, necessary and indispensable, in proceedings for the crime of seduction committed before the passage of Act No. 1773, that a formal complaint instituting the consequent criminal action, and not a mere accusation, be presented by the injured person or her legal representatives who are distinctly named, to the exclusion of all others, in article 448 of the Penal Code. There being no such formal complaint in this case, the trial court had no jurisdiction to try the crime charged; and, as a necessary consequence, all the proceedings in the present case are inherently null and void.

The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause finally dismissed, with the costs in both instances de oficio. So ordered.

Torres, Johnson, Carson and Moreland, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






August-1911 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 5180 August 4, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. MAGDALENO SABERON

    019 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. 5453 August 4, 1911 - DOMINGO CUMAGUN v. JULIANA ALLINGAY

    019 Phil 415

  • G.R. No. 5688 August 4, 1911 - HENRY BLUM v. MARLANO BARRETTO

    019 Phil 421

  • G.R. No. 6130 August 4, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. LEONCIO MANYEL

    019 Phil 432

  • G.R. No. 6207 August 4, 1911 - SIMON MALAHACAN v. JOSEFA IGNACIO

    019 Phil 434

  • G.R. No. 6402 August 4, 1911 - RAFAEL ORTIZ LUIS v. INSULAR GOVERNMENT, ET AL.

    019 Phil 437

  • G.R. No. 6524 August 4, 1911 - VICENTA ANDRADA v. FELIX SEVlLLA, ET AL.

    019 Phil 441

  • G.R. No. 4735 August 7, 1911 - LORENZA PALAFOX v. REMIGIA MADAMBA

    019 Phil 444

  • G.R. No. 5960 August 7, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. PEDRO TACON, ET AL.

    019 Phil 447

  • G.R. No. 6003 August 7, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. CIRIACO IBAÑEZ, ET AL.

    019 Phil 463

  • RAMON MONTES REGUEIFEROS v. MANUEL MARIA RINCON, ET AL. : August 8, 1911 - 019 Phil 477

  • G.R. No. 6133 August 9, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. MELECIO ESTAVILLO, ET AL.

    019 Phil 478

  • G.R. No. 6454 August 9, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. BRIGIDO JAVIER, ET AL.

    019 Phil 499

  • G.R. No. 6475 August 9, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. LAZARO TABUYO

    019 Phil 501

  • G.R. No. 5672 August 12, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. AMBROSIO ELISES

    019 Phil 503

  • G.R. No. 6098 August 12, 1911 - INSULAR GOVERNMENT v. ALDECOA AND COMPANY

    019 Phil 505

  • G.R. No. 6201 August 12, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. SEVERO DE UNGRIA

    019 Phil 518

  • G.R. No. 6463 August 12, 1911 - DAMASA ALCALA v. MODESTA PABALAN

    019 Phil 520

  • G.R. No. 5508 August 14, 1911 - CONGREGACION DE: LA MISION DE SAN VICENTE DE PAUL v. FRANCISCO REYES, ET AL.

    019 Phil 524

  • G.R. No. 5781 August 14, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. VICENTE ORO

    019 Phil 548

  • G.R. No. 6412 August 14, 1911 - DIONISIO T. CRUZ v. SILVINO LOPEZ, ET AL.

    019 Phil 555

  • G.R. No. 6421 August 14, 1911 - UNITED STATES v. CAYETANO IBAÑEZ

    019 Phil 559

  • G.R. No. 5191 August 17, 1911 - CHARLES G. EADES v. ATLANTIC, GULF AND PACIFIC COMPANY

    019 Phil 561

  • G.R. No. 5734 August 17, 1911 - MARCELO MANTILE, ET AL. v. ALEJANDRO CAJUCOM, ET AL.

    019 Phil 563

  • G.R. No. 5789 August 17, 1911 - AGAPITO VILLASEÑOR v. ERLANGER & GALINGER, ET AL.

    019 Phil 574

  • G.R. No. 5759 August 22, 1911 - WALTER E. OLSEN & CO., ET AL. v. MATSON, LORD & BELSER CO.

    019 Phil 577

  • G.R. No. 5829 August 23, 1911 - PEDRO VILLA ABRILLE, ET AL v. JOSE BANUELOS, ET AL.

    020 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 5933 August 25, 1911 - CRISANTO LICHAUCO, ET AL. v. JOSE BERENGUER

    020 Phil 12