Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1914 > December 1914 Decisions > G.R. No. 9677 December 15, 1914 - SANTOS CARTAGENO v. ISAIAS LIJAUCO, ET AL.

028 Phil 638:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 9677. December 15, 1914. ]

In re estate of TOMASA NEPOMUCENO, deceased. SANTOS CARTAGENA, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ISAIAS LIJAUCO and ESPERANZA ZAVALLA, opponents-appellants.

Ramon Diokno, for Appellants.

Francisco Villanueva and Crispin Oben, for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. WILLS; SIGNATURE IN PRESENCE OF WITNESSES. — It is an essential requisite in the due execution of a will that the testator sign it in the presence of the three attesting witnesses.

2. ID.; ID. — While the first part of section 618 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not expressly require that the testator sign the will in the presence of the three attesting witnesses, the second part thereof does require that fact to appear in the attestation clause, and such signing is an essential requisite to the due execution of the will.


D E C I S I O N


MORELAND, J. :


This is an appeal from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Laguna admitting a will to probate and dismissing the opposition thereto.

It appears that Tomasa Nepomuceno executed a will on the 3d day of March, 1913, but her attorney having been informed that the will was signed by herself when only two of the three attesting witnesses were present, he advised her that the will be reexecuted and that the testatrix sign the will in the presence of all three attesting witnesses. Accordingly, on the day following, the will was reexecuted and all of the formalities required by law were observed.

It is contended on the part of the appellants that the will was not executed in the manner required by law and that the testimony of the attesting witnesses was not sufficiently uniform to demonstrate that all of the formalities required by law had been complied with.

We are unable to agree with this contention. It appears clear from the testimony of the attesting witnesses that the testatrix signed the will in their presence and that, at her request, each one of the witnesses in the presence of the testatrix and of the other two attesting witnesses signed the will. This is all that the law requires and while there may be some hesitation in the testimony of some of the witnesses, we are satisfied that the evidence, such as it is, taken in connection with the attesting clause attached to the will, which was made and signed at the time the will was executed and which carries with it the presumption of correctness, is sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that the will was properly executed and should be probated.

It is contended on this appeal that it is not an essential requisite of a will that the testator sign it in the presence of the three attesting witnesses. We are of the opinion that this contention is not sound. While the first part of section 618 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not expressly require that the testator sign the will in the presence of the attesting witnesses, the second part thereof does require that fact to appear in the attestation clause and this court has always held that such a requisite is essential to the due execution of the will. The second part of section 618 provides that "the attestation shall state the fact that the testator signed the will, or caused it to be signed by some other person, at his express direction, in the presence of three witnesses, and that they attested and subscribed it in his presence and in the presence of each other."cralaw virtua1aw library

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs against the appellants.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Johnson, Carson and Araullo, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1914 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 7945 December 1, 1914 - CANDIDO PASCUAL v. EUGENIO DEL SAZ OROZCO, ET AL.

    028 Phil 521

  • G.R. No. 9259 December 1, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. JOSE PATOTO

    028 Phil 535

  • G.R. No. 8894 December 2, 1914 - MARIANO PERFECTO v. FULGENCIO CONTRERAS, ET AL.

    028 Phil 538

  • G.R. No. 8976 December 2, 1914 - GUTIERREZ HERMANOS v. NARCISO ALEGRE, ET AL.

    028 Phil 548

  • G.R. No. 10149 December 2, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. JUAN AGUAS, ET AL.

    028 Phil 552

  • G.R. No. 9003 December 3, 1914 - LUIS RIVAYA v. FELIX SAMSON RAFAEL VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

    028 Phil 556

  • G.R. No. 9700 December 3, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. BENITO MANABAT, ET AL.

    028 Phil 560

  • G.R. No. 9951 December 3, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. A. A. ADDISON

    028 Phil 566

  • G.R. No. 9188 December 4, 1914 - GUTIERREZ HERMANOS v. ENGRACIO ORENSE

    028 Phil 571

  • G.R. No. 9287 December 4, 1914 - LEON JUDA v. E. O. CLAYTON, ET AL.

    028 Phil 579

  • G.R. No. 9417 December 4, 1914 - PEDRO MARTINEZ v. ANTONINO RAMOS, ET AL.

    028 Phil 589

  • G.R. No. 9853 December 4, 1914 - CHUA YENG v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    028 Phil 591

  • G.R. No. 9504 December 5, 1914 - JUAN POIZAT v. GEORGE MORGAN, ET AL.

    028 Phil 597

  • G.R. No. 9726 December 8, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. CARSON TAYLOR

    028 Phil 599

  • G.R. No. 9876 December 8, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. ADRIANO PANLILIO

    028 Phil 608

  • G.R. No. 9408 December 10, 1914 - DEMETRIA CACHO v. GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES

    028 Phil 616

  • G.R. No. 9019 December 11, 1914 - UNITED STATED v. PABLO PIZARRO

    027 Phil 638

  • G.R. No. 8797 December 14, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. FELIX RUBIN

    028 Phil 631

  • G.R. No. 9372 December 15, 1914 - JULIA TUASON v. FAUSTO RAYMUNDO

    028 Phil 635

  • G.R. No. 9677 December 15, 1914 - SANTOS CARTAGENO v. ISAIAS LIJAUCO, ET AL.

    028 Phil 638

  • G.R. No. 8844 December 16, 1914 - FERNANDO MAULINI, ET AL. v. ANTONIO G. SERRANO

    028 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. 8415 December 18, 1914 - GEORGE C. SELLNER v. JOSE GONZALEZ

    027 Phil 640

  • G.R. No. 8942 December 19, 1914 - TEOFILO R. TORRALBA, ET AL. v. TOMAS DEJAN, ET AL.

    028 Phil 654

  • G.R. No. 9991 December 19, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. ROMAN MAGHIRANG, ET AL.

    028 Phil 655

  • G.R. No. 10083 December 19, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. SERGIO VILLACRUCES

    028 Phil 661

  • G.R. No. 9049 December 20, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. BEN RICE

    027 Phil 641

  • G.R. No. 8933 December 22, 1914 - NICOLAS GATDULA v. SIMPLICIO SANTOS, ET AL

    029 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 9308 December 23, 1914 - JUAN BERNARDO v. M. B. LEGASPI

    029 Phil 12

  • G.R. No. 10037 December 23, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. MAXIM0 MALLARI

    029 Phil 14

  • G.R. No. 8320 December 24, 1914 - EPITACIO AGUSTIN v. PEDRO MONTANO

    027 Phil 643

  • G.R. No. 8947 December 24, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. DY LUCHIAT

    027 Phil 646

  • G.R. No. 7747 December 24, 1914 - SEVERO GOROSPE, ET AL v. ANTONIO ILAYAT

    029 Phil 21

  • G.R. No. 7847 December 24, 1914 - BUENAVENTURA DANCEL v. MAMERTO DANCEL, ET AL.

    029 Phil25cralaw:red

  • G.R. No. 8539 December 24, 1914 - MARIA DEL CONSUELO FELISA ROXAS Y CHUIDIAN v. RAFAEL ENRIQUEZ, ET AL

    029 Phil 31

  • G.R. No. 9225 December 24, 1914 - JULIANA SOLANO, ET AL. v. VICENTA SALVILLA, ET AL.

    029 Phil 66

  • G.R. No. 9337 December 24, 1914 - PRUDENCIO DE JESUS v. CITY OF MANILA

    029 Phil 73

  • G.R. No. 9369 December 24, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. ALEJANDRO ALBAO

    029 Phil 86

  • G.R. No. 9405 December 24, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. ADEL HERNANDEZ, ET AL.

    029 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 9582 December 24, 1914 - IRENE CALAMPIANO v. EULALIO TOLENTINO

    029 Phil 116

  • G.R. No. 9878 December 24, 1914 - UNITED STATES v. FRANK TUPASI MOLINA

    029 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. 9058 December 29, 1914 - JULIO ALAGAR v. FRANCISCO PIO DE RODA

    029 Phil 129