Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1933 > December 1933 Decisions > G.R. No. 39403 December 16, 1933 - LEE SING v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

059 Phil 147:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. 39403. December 16, 1933.]

LEE SING, on behalf of his son Lee Shu, Petitioner-Appellee, v. THE INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, Respondent-Appellant.

Solicitor-General Hilado for Appellant.

Marcelo Cariñgal for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. ALIENS; IMMIGRATION; HABEAS CORPUS. — There is no doubt that the board of special inquiry came to the conclusion that the applicant is not the son of his alleged father because they observed a racial difference between the two which made the relationship impossible. There being evidence to sustain the finding of the board and no arbitrary or illegal act on their part being shown, the judgment of the Court of First Instance is reversed with directions to dismiss the petition for habeas corpus.


D E C I S I O N


BUTTE, J.:


This is an appeal by the Insular Collector of Customs from a judgment of the Court of First Instance of Manila granting a writ of habeas corpus to the appellee, Lee Sing, on behalf of his son Lee Shu.

Lee Shu, represented by his alleged father, Lee Sing, applied to the Collector of Customs for admission into the Philippine Islands. Lee Shu based his right to enter the Philippine Islands on the claim that he is the legitimate son of Lee Sing who is an American citizen. Aboard of special inquiry in the Bureau of Customs, before whom both Lee Sing and Lee Shu testified, rendered a decision which is as follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"This is the case of Lee Shu, male, 19 years of age, who seeks admission into this country as minor son of one Lee Sing, an American citizen landed on appeal as such per C. B. R. No. 4001-2. From the investigation of this case, the record shows that the herein applicant and his alleged father committed some discrepancies with regards to the number of rooms their house in China has. The herein applicant testified that it has (house) two rooms and a hall, while the alleged father stated that it has two rooms; a hall and two small additional rooms. It should be made of note that the alleged father arrived in this country barely a month ahead of the applicant and if they really belong to the same family as claimed, such discrepancy would have easily been overcome. The second ground for rejecting is with regards to the surroundings of their house in China, in that applicant testified that what is at the back of their house is a hill and that a farm is also at the right side, while the alleged father stated that ground is behind and the house is at the right side. The last ground for an adverse decision is the fact that according to the observation of the board based on its experience on conducting investigations on similar cases, the herein applicant is a pure blooded Chinese rather than a person born of an American citizen as father as claimed. His conduct to the effect that he is really a full blooded Chinese will bear the board out of its observation and conclusion.

"In view of the foregoing, he is hereby rejected and refused landing in this country. He and his broker are informed of this decision and are given two days within which to appeal to the Insular Collector of Customs, should they feel dissatisfied with the decision."cralaw virtua1aw library

The applicant appealed from the decision of the board and the Collector of Customs, the appellant herein, on February 21, 1933, affirmed the decision of the board and ordered the Lee Shu be returned to the port of his embarkation in accordance with law. Thereupon Lee Sing on behalf of his alleged son, Lee Shu, filed his petition in the Court of First Instance of Manila praying for a writ of habeas corpus.

The contradictions in the testimony on Lee Sing and Lee Shu found by the board and the collector, the court below, examining the same testimony, found not to exist. We have reviewed the testimony and find that there are contradictions as found by the board but they relate to minor details and standing alone, would probably not be sufficient to warrant the exclusion of the applicant. The third ground for exclusion is based on the personal observation of the board which had Lee Sing and Lee Shu before it. The board also had before it the record of Lee Sing, C. B. R. No. 4001-2. From its personal observation of these two individuals, the board concluded that the applicant being a pure blooded Chinese is not the son of the American citizen who claims to be his father. The decision of the board on this point is inaptly worded but we think it is clearly inferable that the board observed racial dissimilarity which made it impossible for Lee Sing to be the father of a pure blooded Chinese.

The lower court rested its decision upon a literal interpretation of the language of the board which it held to be absurd on its face. We think that justice to the board required that an effort be made to get at the true meaning of the board. There is no doubt that the board came to the conclusion that Lee Shu is not the son of Lee Sing because they observed a racial difference between the two which made that relationship impossible.

There being evidence to sustain the finding of the board and no arbitrary or illegal act on their part being shown, the judgment of the court below is revised with directions to dismiss the petition. Cost against the appeal.

Avanceña, C.J., Abad Santos, Vickers, and Diaz, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1933 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 38989 December 1, 1933 - ALEJO BASCO v. MANUEL ERNESTO GONZALEZ

    059 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 39298 December 1, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. SANTIAGO RAMOS, ET AL.

    059 Phil 7

  • G.R. No. 38499 December 6, 1933 - FAUSTINA UDARBE, ET AL. v. MARCIANA JURADO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 11

  • G.R. No. 38572 December 6, 1933 - EUSEBIO RIVERO v. MARIANO RIVERO

    059 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. 37792 December 7, 1933 - QUINTIN DE BORJA v. FRANCISCO DE BORJA

    059 Phil 19

  • G.R. No. 38097 December 7, 1933 - ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO., LTD. v. ORLANES & BANAAG TRANS. CO.

    059 Phil 24

  • G.R. No. 38552 December 7, 1933 - ENRIQUE SOMES v. VICENTE SOMES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. 38398 December 8, 1933 - PHIL. TRUST CO., ET AL. v. L. P. MITCHELL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 30

  • G.R. No. 39864 December 8, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 42

  • G.R. No. 40492 December 8, 1933 - TIMOTEO EVANGELISTA v. CFI OF BULACAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. 40494 December 8, 1933 - GREGORIO PASCUA, ET AL. v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 48

  • G.R. No. 37105 December 9, 1933 - GUI PING HUI v. ACTING INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 52

  • G.R. No. 38298 December 9, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JESUS TOLENTINO

    059 Phil 56

  • G.R. No. 37467 December 11, 1933 - SAN CARLOS MILLING CO. v. BPI, ET AL.

    059 Phil 59

  • G.R. No. 38850 December 11, 1933 - ANTONIO ESTIVA, ET AL. v. GONZALO CAWIL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 67

  • G.R. No. 39034 December 11, 1933 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. GEORGE A. YARED

    059 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. 39456 December 11, 1933 - PASTOR V. VALERA v. RURAL TRANSIT CO.

    059 Phil 93

  • G.R. No. 39470 December 11, 1933 - NORTH LUZON TRANS. CO., INC., ET AL. v. PASTOR V. VALERA

    059 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 39008 December 12, 1933 - NIEVES E. SAÑGA v. SEGUNDO ZABALLERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. 37185 December 13, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. CHUA BUAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. 38332 December 14, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. VALERIANO DUCOSIN

    059 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 38709 December 14, 1933 - SY TIANGCO v. HIPOLITO PABLO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 119

  • In the matter of the complaint against Attorney Gregorio O. Santos. December 16, 1933 - INES VENTURA v. GREGORIO O. SANTOS

    059 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. 38256 December 16, 1933 - PHIL. COOP. LIVESTOCK ASSO. v. TOMAS EARNSHAW, ET AL.

    059 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 38417 December 16, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO MEDINA

    059 Phil 134

  • G.R. No. 39003 December 16, 1933 - LAUREANO ELEGADO, ET AL. v. NICANOR TAVORA

    059 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. 39403 December 16, 1933 - LEE SING v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 38773 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GINES S. ALBURQUERQUE

    059 Phil 150

  • G.R. No. 39913 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO N. MELENDREZ

    059 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. 39181 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. 39217 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. 39275 December 20, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO MENDOZA

    059 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. 40637 December 20, 1933 - M.P. TRANS. CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    059 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. 40759 December 20, 1933 - LIME CORP. OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. MANUEL V. MORAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. 36890 December 21, 1933 - BPI v. PASCUAL ACUÑA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 37590 December 21, 1933 - JOSE FERNANDO RODRIGO v. CONCEPCION CABIGAO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 187

  • G.R. No. 37640 December 21, 1933 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. EL AHORRO INSULAR

    059 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. 38010 December 21, 1933 - PATRICK HENRY FRANK, ET AL. v. G. KOSUYAMA

    059 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. 38084 December 21, 1933 - DOLORES M. VIUDA DE BARRETTO ET AL. v. LA PREVISORA FILIPINA

    059 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. 38131 December 21, 1933 - BEHN, MEYER & CO., ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    059 Phil 227

  • G.R. No. 38684 December 21, 1933 - CYRUS PADGETT v. BABCOCK & TEMPLETON, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 232

  • G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. FAUSTINO RIVERA

    059 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. 38375 December 22, 1933 - JOSE SY JONG CHUY v. PABLO C. REYES

    059 Phil 244

  • G.R. No. 39078 December 22, 1933 - NICASIA BATALLONES v. PUBLEO BATALLONES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. 39839 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. 40659 December 22, 1933 - PASAY TRANS. CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    059 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 40889 December 22, 1933 - ISIDORO YBOLEON v. PEDRO MA. SISON, ET AL.

    059 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. 35694 December 23, 1933 - ALLISON D. GIBBS v. GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    059 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 37090 December 23, 1933 - CRISANTA SUAREZ, ET AL. v. PRUDENCIO TIRAMBULO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. 37345 December 23, 1933 - ALEJANDRA REPOLLO, ET AL. v. BERNABE BALECHA

    059 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 37452 December 23, 1933 - FERMIN SUPIA, ET AL. v. JOSE M. QUINTERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 38052 December 23, 1933 - CONCEPCION ABELLA DE DIAZ v. ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 326

  • G.R. No. 38434 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO D. MEDINA

    059 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 38774 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. ALEKO LILIUS

    059 Phil 339

  • G.R. Nos. 39840 & 39841 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 343