Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1933 > December 1933 Decisions > G.R. No. 39217 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

059 Phil 160:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

SECOND DIVISION

[G.R. No. 39217. December 20, 1933.]

MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, applicant-appellee, v. M. P. TRANCO, INC., opponent-appellant.

Benj. S. Ohnick for Appellant.

Jose C. Abreu for Appellee.

SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC SERVICE; PERIOD FOR A CHANGE OF RATES; POWER OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION TO SUSPEND THE CHANGE. — The legislature has fixed a thirty-day period as the normal period before a proposed change of rates takes effect. The commission has absolute power to suspend the change for a period not exceeding three months, but a true reading of the law would indicate that the commission should have some facts to change the period of thirty days fixed by the Legislature.

2. ID.; FIXING OF RATES BY THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. — There can be no dispute that there is evidence of record from which reasoning men could arrive at the conclusion that the rates adopted by the Public Service Commission are fair. The evidence is insufficient to convince the court that the rates are not remunerative.

3. ID.; DISCRETION OF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. — Notwithstanding that the Public Service Commission held that the proposed rates of the Manila Railroad Company were not proper, it directed that they remain in force pending this appeal. Under the Public Service Act, the Public Service Commission is given full discretion in such matters, and its action thereon is not subject to review unless its action is so arbitrary as to constitute abuse of discretion.


D E C I S I O N


HULL, J.:


This is an appeal by the M. P. Tranco, Inc., from an order of the Public Service Commission entered on January 24, 1933, which is the basis of G.R. No. 39181, 1 in which the Manila Railroad Company was the appellant, and which was decided by this court in a decision promulgated this day.

The first assignment of error in the present appeal relates to the power of the Public Service Commission under paragraph (h) of section 15 of Act No. 3108 to grant ex parte, without notice and without the taking of any evidence, a change in rates. It is to be noted that the Legislature has fixed a thirty-day period as the normal period before a proposed change of rates takes effect. The commission has absolute power to suspend the change for a period not exceeding three months, but a true reading of the law would indicate that the commission should have some facts to change the period of thirty days fixed by the Legislature. But as the period of thirty days has long since been passed, the first assignment of error really has become academic.

The second, third, and fourth assignments of error assert that the old freight rates between Bauang and the mines on fuel oil were not too high and that therefore the commission erred in ordering into effect the rates that it thought were fair, just, and reasonable.

The main question in the case was the cost of hauling fuel oil in tank trucks Bauang to the mines, and the commission was not limited to a choice of putting into effect either the old rates or the proposed new rates. On the evidence as a whole, the commission was convinced that the old rates were too high and the proposed new rates were too low, and it was not necessary, nor would it serve any useful purpose, having arrived at that conclusion, to start another proceeding to enable it to put into effect what the evidence had already convinced it was fair and just.

There can be no dispute that there is evidence of record from which reasoning men could arrive at the conclusion that the rates adopted by the Public Service Commission are fair. The evidence is insufficient to convince us that the rates are not remunerative.

The fifth assignment of error reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"The commission erred in not holding that the practice of the Manila Railroad Company and the Benguet Automobile Line in reducing by adopting so-called thru or joint rates, without making any corresponding reduction in the railroad rate between Manila and Bauang, constitutes unfair, inequitable and illegal competition with the appellant herein and other operators in the Benguet district."cralaw virtua1aw library

This matter was not touched upon in the decision of the Public Service Commission. It did, however, deny the application for the joint rate in question. It knew that the question was going to arise in other matters, and its discretion in declining to reject the proposed rates on one ground when it had already rejected them on another, can hardly be made the basis of a valid assignment of error.

Notwithstanding that the Public Service Commission held that the proposed rates of the Manila railroad Company were not proper, it directed that they remain in force pending this appeal. Under the Public Service Act, the Public Service Commission is given full discretion in such matters, and its action thereon is not subject to review unless its action is so arbitrary as to constitute abuse of discretion.

Under the circumstances of this case and both parties objecting to the rates that the commission set as fair, the commission was not without reason for its action.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs against appellant. So ordered.

Malcolm, Villa-Real, Imperial and Diaz, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. Page 158, ante.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






December-1933 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 38989 December 1, 1933 - ALEJO BASCO v. MANUEL ERNESTO GONZALEZ

    059 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. 39298 December 1, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. SANTIAGO RAMOS, ET AL.

    059 Phil 7

  • G.R. No. 38499 December 6, 1933 - FAUSTINA UDARBE, ET AL. v. MARCIANA JURADO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 11

  • G.R. No. 38572 December 6, 1933 - EUSEBIO RIVERO v. MARIANO RIVERO

    059 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. 37792 December 7, 1933 - QUINTIN DE BORJA v. FRANCISCO DE BORJA

    059 Phil 19

  • G.R. No. 38097 December 7, 1933 - ASIATIC PETROLEUM CO., LTD. v. ORLANES & BANAAG TRANS. CO.

    059 Phil 24

  • G.R. No. 38552 December 7, 1933 - ENRIQUE SOMES v. VICENTE SOMES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 28

  • G.R. No. 38398 December 8, 1933 - PHIL. TRUST CO., ET AL. v. L. P. MITCHELL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 30

  • G.R. No. 39864 December 8, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCELINO VALENCIA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 42

  • G.R. No. 40492 December 8, 1933 - TIMOTEO EVANGELISTA v. CFI OF BULACAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. 40494 December 8, 1933 - GREGORIO PASCUA, ET AL. v. BUENAVENTURA OCAMPO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 48

  • G.R. No. 37105 December 9, 1933 - GUI PING HUI v. ACTING INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 52

  • G.R. No. 38298 December 9, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. JESUS TOLENTINO

    059 Phil 56

  • G.R. No. 37467 December 11, 1933 - SAN CARLOS MILLING CO. v. BPI, ET AL.

    059 Phil 59

  • G.R. No. 38850 December 11, 1933 - ANTONIO ESTIVA, ET AL. v. GONZALO CAWIL, ET AL.

    059 Phil 67

  • G.R. No. 39034 December 11, 1933 - INT’L. BANKING CORP. v. GEORGE A. YARED

    059 Phil 72

  • G.R. No. 39456 December 11, 1933 - PASTOR V. VALERA v. RURAL TRANSIT CO.

    059 Phil 93

  • G.R. No. 39470 December 11, 1933 - NORTH LUZON TRANS. CO., INC., ET AL. v. PASTOR V. VALERA

    059 Phil 96

  • G.R. No. 39008 December 12, 1933 - NIEVES E. SAÑGA v. SEGUNDO ZABALLERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 101

  • G.R. No. 37185 December 13, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. CHUA BUAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 106

  • G.R. No. 38332 December 14, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. VALERIANO DUCOSIN

    059 Phil 109

  • G.R. No. 38709 December 14, 1933 - SY TIANGCO v. HIPOLITO PABLO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 119

  • In the matter of the complaint against Attorney Gregorio O. Santos. December 16, 1933 - INES VENTURA v. GREGORIO O. SANTOS

    059 Phil 123

  • G.R. No. 38256 December 16, 1933 - PHIL. COOP. LIVESTOCK ASSO. v. TOMAS EARNSHAW, ET AL.

    059 Phil 129

  • G.R. No. 38417 December 16, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO MEDINA

    059 Phil 134

  • G.R. No. 39003 December 16, 1933 - LAUREANO ELEGADO, ET AL. v. NICANOR TAVORA

    059 Phil 140

  • G.R. No. 39403 December 16, 1933 - LEE SING v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

    059 Phil 147

  • G.R. No. 38773 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GINES S. ALBURQUERQUE

    059 Phil 150

  • G.R. No. 39913 December 19, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO N. MELENDREZ

    059 Phil 154

  • G.R. No. 39181 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 158

  • G.R. No. 39217 December 20, 1933 - MANILA RAILROAD CO. v. M. P. TRANCO, INC.

    059 Phil 160

  • G.R. No. 39275 December 20, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. RICARDO MENDOZA

    059 Phil 163

  • G.R. No. 40637 December 20, 1933 - M.P. TRANS. CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM., ET AL.

    059 Phil 173

  • G.R. No. 40759 December 20, 1933 - LIME CORP. OF THE PHIL., ET AL. v. MANUEL V. MORAN, ET AL.

    059 Phil 175

  • G.R. No. 36890 December 21, 1933 - BPI v. PASCUAL ACUÑA, ET AL.

    059 Phil 183

  • G.R. No. 37590 December 21, 1933 - JOSE FERNANDO RODRIGO v. CONCEPCION CABIGAO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 187

  • G.R. No. 37640 December 21, 1933 - GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. EL AHORRO INSULAR

    059 Phil 199

  • G.R. No. 38010 December 21, 1933 - PATRICK HENRY FRANK, ET AL. v. G. KOSUYAMA

    059 Phil 206

  • G.R. No. 38084 December 21, 1933 - DOLORES M. VIUDA DE BARRETTO ET AL. v. LA PREVISORA FILIPINA

    059 Phil 212

  • G.R. No. 38131 December 21, 1933 - BEHN, MEYER & CO., ET AL. v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

    059 Phil 227

  • G.R. No. 38684 December 21, 1933 - CYRUS PADGETT v. BABCOCK & TEMPLETON, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 232

  • G.R. Nos. 38215 & 38216 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. FAUSTINO RIVERA

    059 Phil 236

  • G.R. No. 38375 December 22, 1933 - JOSE SY JONG CHUY v. PABLO C. REYES

    059 Phil 244

  • G.R. No. 39078 December 22, 1933 - NICASIA BATALLONES v. PUBLEO BATALLONES, ET AL.

    059 Phil 265

  • G.R. No. 39839 December 22, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 272

  • G.R. No. 40659 December 22, 1933 - PASAY TRANS. CO., INC. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.

    059 Phil 278

  • G.R. No. 40889 December 22, 1933 - ISIDORO YBOLEON v. PEDRO MA. SISON, ET AL.

    059 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. 35694 December 23, 1933 - ALLISON D. GIBBS v. GOV’T. OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS

    059 Phil 293

  • G.R. No. 37090 December 23, 1933 - CRISANTA SUAREZ, ET AL. v. PRUDENCIO TIRAMBULO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. 37345 December 23, 1933 - ALEJANDRA REPOLLO, ET AL. v. BERNABE BALECHA

    059 Phil 308

  • G.R. No. 37452 December 23, 1933 - FERMIN SUPIA, ET AL. v. JOSE M. QUINTERO, ET AL.

    059 Phil 312

  • G.R. No. 38052 December 23, 1933 - CONCEPCION ABELLA DE DIAZ v. ERLANGER & GALINGER, INC., ET AL.

    059 Phil 326

  • G.R. No. 38434 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. MARCIANO D. MEDINA

    059 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 38774 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. ALEKO LILIUS

    059 Phil 339

  • G.R. Nos. 39840 & 39841 December 23, 1933 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. ISLANDS v. GABRIEL HERNANDEZ

    059 Phil 343