Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1941 > October 1941 Decisions > G.R. No. 48634 October 8, 1941 - JUAN SUMULONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

073 Phil 257:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. 48634. October 8, 1941.]

JUAN SUMULONG, in his capacity as President of the POPULAR FRONT, Petitioner, v. THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, Respondent.

Lorenzo Sumulong and Ruperto V. Suñga, for Petitioner.

Solicitor-General de la Costa and Acting Assistant Solicitor- General Gianzon, for the Respondent.

SYLLABUS


1. ELECTIONS; ALLIANCE OF MINORITY PARTIES THAT HAS CEASED TO EXIST; DISCRETION OF COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS TO CHOOSE MINORITY INSPECTOR. — It is now a well-settled rule that where the minimum number of votes required by law (Commonwealth Act No. 657, sec. 5) was polled by a mere coalition or alliance of minority parties, the right to minority representation in the board of election inspectors to which such coalition is entitled, cannot be claimed by any of the component parties which have thereafter separated. And where such situation obtains, the Commission shall have the discretion to choose the minority inspector.


D E C I S I O N


MORAN, J.:


This is a petition for certiorari to review the resolution of the Commission on Elections granting the Popular Front Party headed by Pedro Abad Santos the exclusive right to propose the minority election inspector in the second congressional district of Pampanga for the forthcoming national elections.

In the elections of 1938, the Popular Front Party, supporting the candidacies of Francisco Lazatin and Joaquin Alejandrino for the first and second legislative districts of Pampanga, polled more than ten per centum of the total votes cast in said legislative districts. It appears, however, that said Popular Front Party was then a mere coalition of several minority groups among which are the Popular Front faction of Juan Sumulong and that of Pedro Abad Santos. These two factions now stand out as separate and independent minority parties supporting different sets of candidacies for the forthcoming national elections. On September 15, 1941, the Commission on Elections granted to the Popular Front Party of Abad Santos the right to propose the minority inspector in the first congressional district of Pampanga, and to the Popular Front Party of Sumulong, the minority inspector in the second congressional district of said province. On September 26, 1941, on motion for reconsideration by Francisco M. Ramos, candidate of the Popular Front Party of Abad Santos, the Commission, upon a finding that "the real opposition party in Pampanga is the Popular Front of Abad Santos and that the Popular Front Party of Sumulong has but a nominal existence in the province," modified its ruling of the 15th of September by awarding the minority inspector to the Popular Front Party of Abad Santos. This resolution is the subject of review in this petition for certiorari.

It is now a well-settled rule that where the minimum number of votes required by law (Commonwealth Act No. 657, sec. 5) was polled by a mere coalition or alliance of minority parties, the right to minority representation in the board of election inspectors to which such coalition is entitled, cannot be claimed by any of the component parties which have thereafter separated. (Sumulong v. Commission on Elections, 40 Off. Gaz. [9th Sup. ], No. 13, pp. 226, 230-231; Vinzons v. Commission on Elections Et. Al., G. R. No. 48596, October 1, 1941.) And where such situation obtains, the Commission shall have the discretion to choose the minority inspector. (Commonwealth Act No. 657, sec. 5; Vinzons v. Commission on Elections Et. Al., supra; Rimando v. Commission on Elections Et. Al., G. R. No. 48603, October 1, 1941.) The modification by the Commission of its ruling of September 15th awarding the minority inspector to the Popular Front Party headed by Abad Santos is a legal exercise of the discretion vested in it by law.

The resolution of the Commission is affirmed, with costs against petitioner.

Diaz, Laurel and Horilleno, MM., concur.

Separate Opinions


OZAETA, J., dissenting:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

I maintain here my dissent in the analogous cases of Vinzons and Rimando, G. R. Nos. 48596 and 48603, respectively.

The Commission on Elections having found that neither the Sumulong nor the Abad Santos faction of the Popular Front was entitled under the law to the minority inspector, it should have followed what the law provides in such a case, namely, to choose such inspector at its discretion (sec. 5, Commonwealth Act No. 657), and the person so chosen should be nonpartisan (sec. 6, id.) . When the Commission allowed the Abad Santos faction of the Popular Front to choose the inspector for it, it abdicated the power and authority vested in it by law in favor of said faction, and at the same time unconsciously laid itself bare to criticism of partiality from the Sumulong faction.

It must be borne in mind that the coming election is not for Representatives only but also for President, Vice-President, and Senators-at-large. With more reason, therefore, should the Commission on Elections have appointed a person of its own choice for the second inspector in order better to safeguard the interests of all the contending parties.

There is another reason why in my opinion the award by the Commission on Elections of the second inspector to the Abad Santos faction is particularly unfortunate. It is a notorious fact that the party headed by Mr. Pedro Abad Santos is the Communist Party of the Philippines. Before said party joined the Pagkakaisa ñg Bayan, which was organized by Mr. Juan Sumulong, in December, 1936, it was known as the Socialist Party of Pampanga. After said party headed by Mr. Abad Santos has separated from the Pagkakaisa ñg Bayan or Popular Front, and has reverted to its former independent existence, the Commission on Elections now permits it not only to parade as Popular Front-and not as Communist Party-but also to have the second inspector to which it admittedly is not entitled. I cannot bring myself to sanction that result.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1941 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. 48596 October 1, 1941 - WENCESLAO Q. VINZONS v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

    073 Phil 228

  • G.R. No. 48603 October 1, 1941 - ANTONIO RIMANDO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

    073 Phil 234

  • G.R. No. 48607 October 1, 1941 - HILARIO CAMINO MONCADO, ET AL. v. LA COMISION DE ELECCIONES

    073 Phil 237

  • G.R. No. 47829 October 8, 1941 - SANTIAGO RAMOS v. PEDRO POBLETE, ET AL.

    073 Phil 241

  • G.R. No. 48595 October 8, 1941 - WENCESLAO Q. VINZONS v. LA COMISION DE ELECCIONES, ET AL.

    073 Phil 247

  • G.R. No. 48634 October 8, 1941 - JUAN SUMULONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    073 Phil 257

  • G.R. No. 47453 October 9, 1941 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PONCIANO TAROK

    073 Phil 260

  • G.R. No. 48170 October 10, 1941 - NATIONAL LABOR UNION v. STANDARD VACUUM OIL COMPANY, ET AL.

    073 Phil 279

  • G.R. No. 48204 October 10, 1941 - NATIONAL LABOR UNION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    073 Phil 284

  • G.R. No. 48208 October 10, 1941 - PACIFICO M. SOBRECAREY v. ROMUALDO C. QUIMPO

    073 Phil 285

  • G.R. No. 48609 October 10, 1941 - JUAN SUMULONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS

    073 Phil 288

  • G.R. No. 47018 October 11, 1941 - PIO PESTAÑO v. ALEJO LABRADOR

    073 Phil 297

  • G.R. No. 48121 October 11, 1941 - JACINTO PRESBITERO, ET AL. v. SOTERO RODAS, ET AL.

    073 Phil 300

  • G.R. No. 47897 October 11, 1941 - PURIFICACION PASCUA v. PASTOR ENDENCIA, ETC., ET AL.

    073 Phil 305

  • G.R. No. 47616 October 15, 1941 - JOSE TAN CHONG v. SECRETARY OF LABOR

    073 Phil 307

  • G.R. No. 47623 October 15, 1941 - LAM SWEE SANG v. COMMONWEALTH OF THE PHILIPPINES

    073 Phil 309

  • G.R. No. 48322 October 16, 1941 - EUGENIO SAWIT v. SOTERO RODAS, ETC., ET AL.

    073 Phil 310

  • G.R. No. 48367 October 22, 1941 - AGAPITO CESAR v. MODESTO ABAYA, ET AL.

    073 Phil 316

  • G.R. No. 48414 October 22, 1941 - JUAN MAGBANUA v. CONRADO BARRIOS, ET AL.

    073 Phil 318

  • G.R. No. 48442 October 22, 1941 - VENANCIO TOLEDO v. SILANG TRAFFIC CO., INC., ET AL.

    073 Phil 321

  • G.R. No. 47004 October 23, 1941 - INSULAR LUMBER COMPANY v. EL ADMINISTRADOR DE RENTAS INTERNAS DE LAS ISLAS FILIPINAS

    073 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. 48468 October 24, 1941 - ILOILO TRADING CENTER AND EXCHANGE v. SOTERO RODAS, ETC., ET AL.

    073 Phil 327

  • G.R. Nos. 47447-47449 October 29, 1941 - TEODORO R. YANGCO, ETC. v. MANUEL LASERNA, ET AL.

    073 Phil 330

  • G.R. No. 47953 October 29, 1941 - ILDEFONSO QUIMZON v. ALAMINOS COOPERATIVE MARKETING ASSOCIATION

    073 Phil 342

  • G.R. No. 48248 October 29, 1941 - EL PUEBLO DE FILIPINAS v. SIXTO DOMENDEN

    073 Phil 349

  • G.R. No. 47928 October 30, 1941 - ANTERO TANEGA v. MAXIMINO NAZARENO

    073 Phil 354

  • G.R. No. 47978 October 31, 1941 - MARCIANO MADUEÑO v. CABANATUAN LUMBER COMPANY

    073 Phil 356

  • G.R. No. 48128 October 31, 1941 - THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF MANILA v. A. Q. VER

    073 Phil 363

  • G.R. No. 48547 October 31, 1941 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ANG GIOC, ET AL.

    073 Phil 366