Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1953 > February 1953 Decisions > G.R. No. L-5838 February 9, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AQUILINO VILLANUEVA

092 Phil 637:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-5838. February 9, 1953.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AQUILINO VILLANUEVA, Defendant-Appellant.

Carlos C. Rodriguez for Appellant.

Assistant Solicitor General Francisco Carreon and Solicitor Martiniano P. Vivo for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. TREASON. — At about midnight of December 24, 1944, A, armed with a pistol, accompanied some Japanese soldiers equipped with rifles, arrested and carried away M and P to the Japanese garrison where the latter were detained for several hours. Moreover, late in December 1944, appellant A formed a unit of the Makapili organization, of which he was the chief. Said unit was engaged in patrolling the town and looking for guerillas and persons suspected of helping the underground movement against the Japanese. Some of the members wore uniforms similar to those used by the Japanese, and army bands with Japanese characters. They were entitled to the respect and protection of the local authorities, and the people were obliged to bow to them. Held: The acts committed by A constitute treason.


D E C I S I O N


JUGO, J.:


Aquilino Villanueva was accused of treason before the People’s Court on three counts. Upon the abolition of said court, the case was remanded for trial to the Court of First Instance of Nueva Ecija. He was found guilty by this court and sentenced to suffer 16 years and 1 day of reclusion temporal with the accessory penalties of the law and to pay the costs. The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals claiming that the trial court erred in finding him guilty of the crime charged.

The Court of Appeals, finding that there was no mitigating nor aggravating circumstance, held that the penalty of reclusion perpetua should be imposed upon the appellant, and, consequently, certified the case to this Court in accordance with law.

The evidence for the prosecution has established the following facts:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

The accused is a Filipino. At about midnight of December 24, 1944, the defendant accompanied eight or nine Japanese soldiers to the place where Pablo Parungao, Eugenio Maliwat and Jose Maliwat were doing guard duty as members of the neighborhood association in Talavera, Nueva Ecija. The Japanese soldiers were armed with rifles with fixed bayonets while the appellant was carrying a pistol. This group of Japanese soldiers arrested Jose Maliwat and carried him away. They came back and also arrested Pablo Parungao. Parungao and Maliwat were taken to the Japanese garrison in the poblacion of Talavera, where they were detained for forty-eight hours until they were released upon request of the Mayor of Talavera, Jose B. David. In said garrison two other persons, Manuel Corpus and Francisco Payoyo were already detained. This fact was testified to by Pablo Parungao and Eugenio Maliwat, brother of Jose.

Late in December, 1944, the appellant formed a unit of the "Makapili" organization, with himself as chief, with the rank of captain. Said unit was engaged in patrolling the town and looking for guerrillas and persons suspected of helping the underground movement against the Japanese. Some of the members were wearing uniforms similar to those used by the Japanese soldiers and arm bands with Japanese characters which, according to the Japanese commander, were the symbol of membership in the "Makapili" organization, and those wearing said arm bands were entitled to the respect and protection of the local authorities, and the people were obliged to bow to them. At the time of the arrest of the Filipino guards, the defendant was wearing said arm band. These facts were testified to by the Mayor and other witnesses for the prosecution.

The defendant testified in his own behalf to the effect that he was the head of the "Ganap" a religious organization in Talavera, where they had a temple; that he moved to Cabanatuan in order to escape from the Japanese, staying there from June 12, 1942 to January 6, 1945, engaged in the business of a tinsmith; and that he never took part in the arrest of any person.

The trial court did not give credence to this testimony of the defendant which consisted of a mere denial of the charges, nor did it give any weight to his alleged alibi. We see no reason for distributing this finding.

Inasmuch as it has not been established by the prosecution that the appellant participated directly or indirectly in the killing or disappearance of any person, the judgment appealed from should not be modified.

In view of the foregoing, the decision of the trial court is hereby affirmed with costs against the appellant. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Montemayor, Reyes, Bautista Angelo and Labrador, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1953 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-6266 February 2, 1953 - EULOGIO RODRIGUEZSR., ET AL. v. VICENTE GELLA, ET AL.

    092 Phil 603

  • G.R. No. L-5838 February 9, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AQUILINO VILLANUEVA

    092 Phil 637

  • G.R. No. L-4911 February 10, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BULALAKAO MAMASALAYA, ET AL.

    092 Phil 639

  • G.R. No. L-5468 February 11, 1953 - ANTONIO TABOR v. HON. RODOLFO BALTAZAR, ET AL.

    092 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-5874 February 11, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEOGRACIAS LASAFIN

    092 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-4688 February 16, 1953 - IN RE: WU SIOCK BOON v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. L-4693 February 16, 1953 - IN RE: LEON RATUNIL SY QUIMSUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. L-4872 February 16, 1953 - EUGENIO BRAVO v. CIRIACO BARRERAS

    092 Phil 679

  • G.R. No. L-5155 February 16, 1953 - TARCELA R. VDA. DE BOUGH, ETC. v. ESTEBAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 682

  • G.R. No. L-5278 February 17, 1953 - SUY SUI v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 684

  • G.R. No. L-5847 February 17, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIONISIO FELICIANO

    092 Phil 688

  • G.R. No. L-5429 February 19, 1953 - LOPE SARREAL v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-4656 February 23, 1953 - FRANCISCO MALLARI, ET AL. v. AUGUSTO MALLARI, ET AL.

    092 Phil 694

  • G.R. No. L-5268 February 23, 1953 - GREGORIO CRUZ v. MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC.

    092 Phil 699

  • G.R. No. L-5181 February 24, 1953 - FRANCISCA E. VDA. DE ESPARTERO, ET AL. v. JUAN LADAW, ET AL.

    092 Phil 704

  • G.R. No. L-5361 February 24, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONIDAS RASAY

    092 Phil 708

  • G.R. No. L-4589 February 27, 1953 - MARIO DE LA CRUZ v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 714

  • G.R. Nos. L-4743-45 February 27, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMINGOL HANASAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 717

  • G.R. No. L-5064 February 27, 1953 - BIENVENIDO A. IBARLE v. ESPERANZA M. PO

    092 Phil 721

  • G.R. No. L-5175 February 27, 1953 - CATALINO CAMIA ET AL. v. FELIPE CHANCO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-5627 February 27, 1953 - NORBERTO L. DAYRIT, ET AL. v. EDMUNDO S. PICCIO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 729

  • G.R. No. L-5832 February 27, 1953 - PAZ FIRMEZA v. EVO SANTIAGO DAVID

    092 Phil 733

  • G.R. Nos. L-4717-18 February 28, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL B. TIDOY, ET AL.

    092 Phil 736

  • G.R. No. L-5693 February 28, 1953 - URBANA D. ANZURES v. ALTO SURETY & INS. CO., INC., ET AL.

    092 Phil 742

  • G.R. No. L-5780 February 28, 1953 - TIMOTEO CACHOLA v. ANDRES CORDERO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 744

  • G.R. No. L-5899 February 28, 1953 - PANTALEON NAVAL v. GENEROSO SANA

    092 Phil 747