Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1953 > February 1953 Decisions > G.R. No. L-4589 February 27, 1953 - MARIO DE LA CRUZ v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

092 Phil 714:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-4589. February 27, 1953.]

MARIO DE LA CRUZ, Petitioner-Appellee, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Oppositor-Appellant.

Assistant Solicitor General Francisco Carreon and Solicitor Florencio Villamor for Appellant.

Olimpio Kapaluñgan and Leandro Domingo for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. NATURALIZATION; DECLARATION OF INTENTION TO APPLY FOR PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP; REQUISITE OF HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION. — An applicant who has finished only up to the second year of high school is not exempt from filing a "Declaration of Intention to become Filipino Citizen" as required by section 6 of the Naturalization Law.

2. ID.; ID.; WHEN TO FILE IT. — Such "Declaration of Intention" should be filed one year before the presentation of the petition for naturalization. If filed during the pendency of the naturalization proceeding, naturalization should be denied, even if the Government did not then object or asked for the dismissal of the petition. The provincial fiscal or the Solicitor General can not waive such requisite. (Bautista v. Republic, 87 Phil., 818; Squillantini v. Republic, 88 Phil., 135).


D E C I S I O N


JUGO, J.:


This is an appeal by the Solicitor General from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Manila, granting Philippine citizenship to one Mario de la Cruz, alias Lim Kiu Tiong. Mario de la Cruz was born on May 24, 1925, in the City of Manila of Chinese parents, who were citizens of the Republic of China. He finished his primary course and has reached the second year high school in the San Juan de Letran College, a school recognized by the Government, which admits students of any race or nationality. He is co-owner of the business known as "State Lumber", with a capital of P50,000. He has an income of P5,000 per annum, owning an automobile and a truck. He filed with the court his petition for naturalization on June 16, 1948. Before the hearing was finished, he filed on October 20, 1948 with the office of the Solicitor General his "declaration of intention" to become a Filipino citizen; that is, after he had filed his petition in court, contrary to the provisions of section 5 of the Revised Naturalization Law, Commonwealth Act No. 473, as amended by Act No. 535, which requires that the "declaration of intention" be filed one year before the presentation of the petition. He claims, however, that he is exempt under section 6 of said Act from the requisite of filing his "Declaration of Intention", for the reason that he was born in the Philippines and received his primary and secondary education in a school recognized by the Government, which admits students of any race or nationality.

The fact that he has finished only up to the second year high school does not entitle him to such exemption, for, as held by this court in the case of Florentino Uy Boco v. Republic of the Philippines * (47 Off. Gaz., pp. 3442, 3445 and 3447).

"El que solamente ha estudiado hasta el segundo año de la escuela secundaria (high school) no ha recibido la instruccion secundaria; solamente ha estudiado la mitad de ella. Si el solicitante hubiera estudiado la primera y segunda enseñanza (y no parte solamente de la secundaria), podria presentar su solicitud sin necesidad de esta declaracion de proposito de hacerse ciudadano filipino."cralaw virtua1aw library

We see no reason for modifying the above doctrine.

The appellee contends that he substantially complied with the Naturalization Law by presenting his "Declaration of Intention" during the pendency of the court proceedings. This contention cannot be sustained.

"An alien who seeks political rights as a member of this nation can rightly obtain them only upon terms and conditions specified by Congress. Courts are without authority to sanction changes or modifications; their duty is rigidly to enforce the legislative will in respect of the matter so vital to the public welfare." (United States v. Ginsberg, 243 U. S., 472, 475; 61 L. ed., 853, 856, cited in Benjamin Bautista v. Republic of the Philippines, 87 Phil., 818.

The appellee argues that the Solicitor General did not ask for the dismissal of the petition or object to the introduction in evidence of the document evidencing the filing of appellee’s "Declaration of Intention" on October 18, 1948 and that such failure amounted to a waiver of the requisite of presentation of declaration. This contention is untenable for the reason that:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"La competencia del juzgado se confiere por la ley, no por la voluntad del solicitante, ni por la acquiescencia del fiscal provincial, ni por la condescendencia del juez que lo preside." (Jose Clevio Manlio Squillantini v. Republic of the Philippines, (88 Phil., 135.)

In view of the foregoing, the judgment appealed from is reversed and the petitioner, Mario de la Cruz, is denied naturalization as a Filipino citizen, without costs. So ordered.

Paras, C.J., Feria, Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Tuason, Montemayor, Reyes, Bautista Angelo and Labrador, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



* 85 Phil., 320.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






February-1953 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-6266 February 2, 1953 - EULOGIO RODRIGUEZSR., ET AL. v. VICENTE GELLA, ET AL.

    092 Phil 603

  • G.R. No. L-5838 February 9, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. AQUILINO VILLANUEVA

    092 Phil 637

  • G.R. No. L-4911 February 10, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. BULALAKAO MAMASALAYA, ET AL.

    092 Phil 639

  • G.R. No. L-5468 February 11, 1953 - ANTONIO TABOR v. HON. RODOLFO BALTAZAR, ET AL.

    092 Phil 664

  • G.R. No. L-5874 February 11, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DEOGRACIAS LASAFIN

    092 Phil 668

  • G.R. No. L-4688 February 16, 1953 - IN RE: WU SIOCK BOON v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 671

  • G.R. No. L-4693 February 16, 1953 - IN RE: LEON RATUNIL SY QUIMSUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 675

  • G.R. No. L-4872 February 16, 1953 - EUGENIO BRAVO v. CIRIACO BARRERAS

    092 Phil 679

  • G.R. No. L-5155 February 16, 1953 - TARCELA R. VDA. DE BOUGH, ETC. v. ESTEBAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 682

  • G.R. No. L-5278 February 17, 1953 - SUY SUI v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 684

  • G.R. No. L-5847 February 17, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DIONISIO FELICIANO

    092 Phil 688

  • G.R. No. L-5429 February 19, 1953 - LOPE SARREAL v. BIENVENIDO TAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 689

  • G.R. No. L-4656 February 23, 1953 - FRANCISCO MALLARI, ET AL. v. AUGUSTO MALLARI, ET AL.

    092 Phil 694

  • G.R. No. L-5268 February 23, 1953 - GREGORIO CRUZ v. MANILA SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC.

    092 Phil 699

  • G.R. No. L-5181 February 24, 1953 - FRANCISCA E. VDA. DE ESPARTERO, ET AL. v. JUAN LADAW, ET AL.

    092 Phil 704

  • G.R. No. L-5361 February 24, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LEONIDAS RASAY

    092 Phil 708

  • G.R. No. L-4589 February 27, 1953 - MARIO DE LA CRUZ v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

    092 Phil 714

  • G.R. Nos. L-4743-45 February 27, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMINGOL HANASAN, ET AL.

    092 Phil 717

  • G.R. No. L-5064 February 27, 1953 - BIENVENIDO A. IBARLE v. ESPERANZA M. PO

    092 Phil 721

  • G.R. No. L-5175 February 27, 1953 - CATALINO CAMIA ET AL. v. FELIPE CHANCO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 724

  • G.R. No. L-5627 February 27, 1953 - NORBERTO L. DAYRIT, ET AL. v. EDMUNDO S. PICCIO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 729

  • G.R. No. L-5832 February 27, 1953 - PAZ FIRMEZA v. EVO SANTIAGO DAVID

    092 Phil 733

  • G.R. Nos. L-4717-18 February 28, 1953 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MANUEL B. TIDOY, ET AL.

    092 Phil 736

  • G.R. No. L-5693 February 28, 1953 - URBANA D. ANZURES v. ALTO SURETY & INS. CO., INC., ET AL.

    092 Phil 742

  • G.R. No. L-5780 February 28, 1953 - TIMOTEO CACHOLA v. ANDRES CORDERO, ET AL.

    092 Phil 744

  • G.R. No. L-5899 February 28, 1953 - PANTALEON NAVAL v. GENEROSO SANA

    092 Phil 747