Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1954 > October 1954 Decisions > G.R. No. L-6913 October 30, 1954 - SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

096 Phil 119:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-6913. October 30, 1954.]

SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO, ET AL., Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ET AL., Respondents.

Mariano H. de Joya, for Petitioners.

Pacifico de Ocampo and Marino T. Regalado for respondent Ma-ao Sugar Planters’ Association.


SYLLABUS


1. CORPORATIONS; RECONSTITUTION OF RECORDS; SCOPE OF SECTION 3 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 62. — Under section 3 of Republic Act No. 62, reconstitution of articles of incorporation and by-laws of corporations may be made without any time limit upon the basis of available copies in the possession or custody of another, provided the authenticity of said copies is established to the satisfaction of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. ID.; ID.; ID.; RECONSTITUTION OF EITHER THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OR THE BY-LAWS, OR BOTH. — Under Republic Act No. 62, reconstitution may refer to the articles of incorporation or to the by-laws, singly or together.

3. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; CORRECTION OF CLERICAL ERRORS IN CERTIFICATE OF RECONSTITUTION. — Clerical errors in the certificate of reconstitution may be corrected.


D E C I S I O N


PARAS, C.J. :


The respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. was organized by various sugar planters of Maao, Occidental Negros, as a non-stock corporation registered with the Mercantile Registry of the Bureau of Commerce on August 5, 1920, for a term of 50 years. Its principal purpose was to work for the common welfare of the members, representing them in their dealings with the Maao Sugar Central Co., Inc. Its incorporation papers were lost when its office was burned during the last war. The corporation nevertheless resumed its business after the liberation and has continued to do so ever since. Indeed, the Bacolod Branch of the Philippine National Bank, which has a true copy of the certificate of registration and articles of incorporation of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc., has granted loans to the latter.

Under section 2 of Republic Act No. 62, as amended by Republic Act No. 350, "All registered domestic corporations, and registered partnerships or other forms of associations which lost their articles of incorporation and by-laws or articles of partnerships, either totally or partially, shall reconstruct the same or take steps towards such reconstruction within a period not to extend beyond December thirty one, nineteen hundred and fifty by following the procedure which the Securities and Exchange Commission may adopt by rules and regulations approved by the Secretary of Justice. Such corporations, associations or partnerships as shall fail to reconstruct their records within the said period, or having taken steps to reconstruct such records within that period, shall fail to exert reasonable efforts to complete the reconstruction required, pursuant to the aforesaid rules and regulations, shall lose all rights, powers, and privileges afforded by their past registration."cralaw virtua1aw library

Notwithstanding the loss in its files of the incorporation papers of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. during the last war, it had failed to reconstruct its records on or before December 31, 1950, in accordance with section 2 of Republic Act 62. Believing that the Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. was dissolved for its failure to so reconstruct its incorporation papers, the petitioners Sergio F. del Castillo and four others, formed on September 6, 1951, another corporation known as the Maao Farmers’ Association, Inc., the purpose of which was substantially the same as that of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. In the meantime, the latter reconstituted its incorporation papers by submitting to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of its certificate of registration and articles of incorporation, based on the true copy kept in the office of the Bacolod Branch of the Philippine National Bank, and on September 19, 1951, the Commission issued in favor of the Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. the corresponding certificate of reconstitution. The action of the Commission was premised on section 5 of Republic Act No. 62 which provides that "Domestic corporations and registered partnerships whose articles of incorporation and by-laws or articles of co-partnerships have been lost or destroyed shall furnish the Securities and Exchange Commission with certified copies of such records as it may require."cralaw virtua1aw library

On November 5, 1951, the petitioners Sergio F. del Castillo Et. Al., through counsel, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a petition or the reconsideration and consequent cancellation of the certificate of reconstitution issued on September 19, 1951, in favor of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. The latter being affected by said petition for reconsideration and cancellation, intervened and filed an opposition thereto. After hearing, the Securities and Exchange Commission denied the petition in its decision dated July 13, 1953, from which the present petition for review was filed in this Court.

It is contended for petitioners that section 3 of Republic Act No. 62, already above quoted, under which no time limit is prescribed for reconstitution, contemplates a situation where the corporate records kept in the office of the corporation have not been lost or destroyed, and not a case where a copy of the articles of incorporation may be found in the possession or custody of another. We can not acquiesce in this contention. The purpose of Republic Act No. 62 is obviously to enable corporations or other entities to reconstruct or reconstitute its corporate records, especially the articles of incorporation, with a view to establishing their corporate existence for the protection of the public. This purpose will in a way be frustrated if section 3 of Republic Act No. 62 were to be construed strictly so as to limit its application to cases where the articles of incorporation and by-laws kept in the files of the entities concerned have not been lost or destroyed. We are inclined to rule that the law embraces situations wherein copies or necessary corporate records are available, regardless of the place where they may be found, as long as, and this is important, that their authenticity is established to the satisfaction of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the present case, the copies of the certificate of registration and articles of incorporation submitted by the Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. to the Commission, were reproduced from the copies in the custody of the Philippine National Bank at Bacolod City, and it is not here pretended that said copies are not authentic. At any rate, we have to accept the factual finding of the Securities and Exchange Commission that it is fully satisfied as to the reliableness and authenticity thereof. Moreover, it is interesting to note that no intimation whatsoever has been made that the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. is not a duly organized corporation or that its corporate term under the articles of incorporation had expired.

The petitioners further argue that, as no copy of the by-laws of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. is available, this case falls under section 2 of Republic Act No. 62, under which reconstruction of corporate records could be accomplished only until December 31, 1950. The petitioners reason out that both sections 2 and 3 of Republic Act No. 62 mention articles of incorporation and by- laws, with the result that the reconstruction or reconstitution, as the case may be, should refer necessarily to the articles of incorporation and by-laws together. This contention is untenable, if we consider the circumstance that, in the present case, there is no showing that the articles of incorporation and the by-laws of the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. were contained in one and the same document. The law is merely permissive as to the records that may be reconstructed or reconstituted and does not prohibit the reconstitution of the articles of incorporation or the by-laws, whichever is available, under section 3 of Republic Act No. 62.

It appears that in the certificate of reconstitution issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 19, 1951, reference was made to the copy "certified to by the Secretary-treasurer thereof, as true and correct copy of the signed duplicate copy of the original in their possession." The petitioners claim that this is contrary to the actual fact, because the copy submitted to the Commission was reproduced from a mere copy kept in the office of the Bacolod Branch of the Philippine National Bank. The error has been admitted by the Commission to be clerical, arising from the circumstance that the general form used in cases of reconstitution was adopted, and the Commission in the appealed decision recalled the certificate of reconstitution for necessary correction. We believe that the mistake is of no moment, the important consideration being that the Commission was satisfied that the copy submitted to it was authentic. In this connection it may be stated that Republic Act No. 62 was designed undoubtedly not to extinguish the corporate existence of corporations whose records were lost or destroyed, but, on the contrary, to enable them to maintain their corporate status. As already stated, there is no pretense on the part of the petitioners that the respondent Maao Sugar Planters’ Association, Inc. was never a corporation or that its corporate term had expired. Upon the other hand, as found by the Securities and Exchange Commission, "It has been in business uninterruptedly since liberation, helping its members, and petitioners who had been such members, dealing with it and recognizing its lawful corporate existence, can not and should not now be allowed to question the same." At any rate, if the dissolution of the respondent corporation is in order, the proper action for quo warranto may be availed of.

Wherefore, the appealed decision is affirmed and it is so ordered with costs against the petitioners.

Pablo, Bengzon, Padilla, Montemayor, Reyes, A., Bautista Angelo, Concepcion, and Reyes, J. B. L., JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






October-1954 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-5805 October 7, 1954 - SAMONTE v. SAMONTE, ET AL

    096 Phil 1

  • G.R. No. L-5629 October 11, 1954 - LILI SISON JARANILLA v. CONSOLACION GONZALES

    096 Phil 3

  • G.R. No. L-6730 October 15, 1954 - PEDRO GABRIEL, ET AL v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL, ET AL

    096 Phil 10

  • G.R. No. L-6515 October 18, 1954 - DAGUHOY ENTERPRISES v. RITA L. PONCE

    096 Phil 15

  • G.R. No. L-7251 October 18, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. IRENEA ALIPAO

    096 Phil 20

  • G.R. No. L-7154 October 23, 1954 - PACIFIC MICRONISIAN LINE v. N. BAENS DEL ROSARIO

    096 Phil 23

  • G.R. No. L-6305 October 25, 1954 - AGUSTIN GIL v. ROSA S. TALAÑA

    096 Phil 32

  • G.R. No. L-6317 October 25, 1954 - RUFO SALVADOR v. ISIDRO ROMERO

    096 Phil 34

  • G.R. No. L-5572 October 26, 1954 - PEDRO GUERRERO v. SERAPION D

    096 Phil 37

  • G.R. No. L-7079 October 26, 1954 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO V. BAUTISTA

    096 Phil 43

  • G.R. No. L-6295 October 27, 1954 - WORLD WIDE INSURANCE AND SURETY CO. v. Hon. FRANCISCO E. JOSE

    096 Phil 45

  • G.R. No. L-7084 October 27, 1954 - SMITH v. REGISTRADOR DE TITULOS DE DAVAO

    096 Phil 53

  • G.R. No. L-6491 October 29, 1954 - LAKAS NG PAGKAKAISA SA PETER PAUL v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

    096 Phil 63

  • G.R. No. L-7057 October 29, 1954 - MACHINERY & ENGINEERING SUPPLIES v. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS

    096 Phil 70

  • G.R. No. L-5767 October 30, 1954 - PLACIDA MINA, ET AL v. LAZARO DEGALA, ET AL

    096 Phil 77

  • G.R. No. L-6114 October 30, 1954 - SOUTHERN LUZON EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION v. JUANITA GOLPEO

    096 Phil 83

  • G.R. No. L-6301 October 30, 1954 - THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF CALOOCAN v. CHOAN HUAT & CO.

    096 Phil 88

  • G.R. No. L-6453 October 30, 1954 - ERNEST BERG v. VALENTIN TEUS

    096 Phil 102

  • G.R. No. L-6725 October 30, 1954 - AMPARO JOAQUIN GUTIERREZ ET AL. v. JOSE CAMUS

    096 Phil 114

  • G.R. No. L-6913 October 30, 1954 - SERGIO F. DEL CASTILLO v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

    096 Phil 119

  • G.R. No. L-7189 October 30, 1954 - RAYMUNDO CABANGCALA v. SEVERO DOMINGO

    096 Phil 124

  • G.R. No. L-7198 October 30, 1954 - PACIENCIA G. PICZON v. JOHN DOE

    096 Phil 127