Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1959 > March 1959 Decisions > G.R. No. L-10884 March 31, 1959 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PHILIPPINE LEATHER CO. INC.

105 Phil 400:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-10884. March 31, 1959.]

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PHILIPPINE LEATHER CO. INC., ET AL., Defendants-Appellants.

Castano & Ampil for Appellants.

Ramon B. De los Reyes for Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. PLEADING AND PRACTICE; SUMMARY JUDGMENT; WHEN MOVING PARTY ENTERED TO JUDGMENT; CASE AT BAR. — In their answer, the defendants admit the plaintiff’s averments excepts as to the correctness of the amounts due, the correctness of which they were still checking, and for that reason lacking sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth and veracity of the amounts due, they deny the amounts claimed by the plaintiff to be due them. Hence, plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment.


D E C I S I O N


PADILLA, J.:


In its complaint filed in the Court of First Instance of Manila, the plaintiff alleges that on 1 September 1952 the defendant Philippine Leather Co., Inc. applied for a commercial letter of credit in the sum of $14,814.80, U. S. currency, under the terms and conditions set forth in an application filed by the defendants in favor of the Turner Tanning Machinery Co. of Peabody, Massachusetts, U. S. A. to cover the full invoice value of certain machineries and their accessories; that on 3 October 1952 the plaintiff approved the application "subject to 30% deposit and the joint and several signatures of Mr. Isidoro Tinoco and Mrs. Soledad L. Basa" which conditions were complied with; that on 8 October 1952, the plaintiff issued Letter of credit No. 51469 in favor of the Turner Tanning Machinery Company; that on 15 November 1952 the Turner Tanning Machinery Co., drew upon the letter of credit the sum of $14,549.17, U.s. currency; that upon arrival in the Philippines of the machineries and their accessories imported by the defendants, the plaintiff released them to the defendants under a trust receipt, that on 23 January 1953 the plaintiff presented to the defendants for payment the draft drawn by the Turner Tanning Machinery Co., upon Letter of Credit No. 51469 which was accepted by them; that after the draft had matured on 23 April 1953 the plaintiff made numerous demands upon the defendants to pay the amount of the draft and the charges due thereon but the defendants failed and refused to pay; and that as of 15 October 1953, the outstanding balance of the defendants on the draft is P22,787.79, Philippine currency, plus interest thereon at the rate of P4,89135 daily until fully paid. It alleges further that on 30 January 1953 the defendant Philippine Leather Co., Inc., applied for a commercial letter of credit in the sum of $2,587.50, U.S. currency, under the terms and conditions set forth in an application filed by the defendants in favor of Bay State Chemical Co., of Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A., to pay for the importation of color dye; that the plaintiff approved the application "subject to 30% deposit and the joint and several signatures of Mr. Isidoro Tinoco and Mrs. Soledad L. Basa," which conditions were complied with; that there after the plaintiff issued Letter of Credit No. 53753 in favor of the Bay State Chemical Co., that on 12 March 1953 the Bay State Chemical Co., drew upon the letter of credit the sum of $2,482.40, U.S. currency; that the draft drawn by the Bay State Chemical Co., was presented by the plaintiff to the defendants for payment; that the defendants failed and refused to pay the amount of the draft and the charges due thereon; that because of the failure and refusal of the defendants to pay their obligation, the plaintiff delivered the documents of the shipment to the Luzon Brokerage Co., and requested it to claim and store the shipment in its bonded warehouse, for which service and storage the defendants are liable to the Luzon Brokerage Co.; that as of 15 October 1953; the outstanding balance of the of the defendants on the draft is P4,503.05, Philippine currency, plus interest thereon at the rate of P.083569 daily until fully paid.

The plaintiff prays that after hearing judgment be rendered ordering the defendants to pay it the same of P22,787.79, with daily interest thereon at the rate of P4.89135 from 15 October 1953 until fully paid; 10% of the said amount as attorney’s fee; P4,503.05, with daily interest thereon at the rate of P0.83569 from 15 October 1953 until fully paid; the amount of storage and other charges that the Luzon Brokerage Co., would charge the plaintiff for the handling and storage of the merchandise imported by the defendants under Letter of Credit No. 53753; and the costs of the suit. The plaintiff further prays that pending hearing and final judgment, a writ of attachment be issued commanding the Sheriff of the City of Manila to levy upon attachment on the properties of the defendants as security for the satisfaction of any judgment that it may secure against them.

In their answer filed on 28 December 1953 the defendants admit the plaintiff’s averments except as to the correctness of the amounts due on the two drafts, the correctness of which they were still checking, and for that reason lacking sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth and veracity of the amounts due on the two drafts, they deny the amounts claimed by the plaintiff to be due from them.

On 25 June 1954 the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that since the defendants has admitted the material averments of its complaint except as to the correctness of the amounts due, the defendants’ answer did not tender a genuine issue. The plaintiff attached to its motion an affidavit subscribed and sworn to by Ceferino Saavedra, Manager of the Special Assets Department of the plaintiff, in charge of all outstanding accounts of its debtors, stating the payments made by the defendants on their account and the exact total amount due from them.

On 7 October 1954 the Court granted the plaintiff’s motion and rendered judgment ordering the defendants, jointly and severally, to pay-

. . . the plaintiff in the first cause of action, the amount of P22,787.79, with a daily interest of P4.89135 from October 15, 1953 up to full payment thereof; and 10% of the amount due for attorney’s fees. On the second cause of action, defendants shall pay, jointly and severally, the sum of P4,503.05, with a daily interest of P0.83569 from October 15, 1953 until full payment thereof.

Defendants shall also pay the costs.

The defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals. The latter certified the case to this Court for the reason that only questions of law are raised.

Rule 36 provides:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

Section 1. Summary judgment for claimant. — A party seeking to recover upon a claim, counterclaim, or crossclaim or to obtain a declaratory relief may, at any time after the pleading in answer thereto has been served, move with affidavits for a summary judgment in his favor upon all or any part thereof.

SEC. 3. Motion and proceedings thereon. --The motion shall be served at least ten days before the time specified for the hearing. The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve opposing affidavits. The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions or file, together with the affidavits, show that, except as to the amount of damages, there is no genuine issue as to any of the material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

SEC. 5. Form of affidavits. — Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. Sworn or certified copies of all papers of parts thereof referred to in an affidavit shall be attached thereto or served therewith.

The defendants’ answer that as to the first cause of action they —

. . . are still checking on the correctness of the alleged balance outstanding against them and in favor of the plaintiff; consequently, for lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth and veracity of the averments embodied in paragraph 7 thereof, they hereby specifically deny the allegations therein stated;

and that as to the second cause of action they--

. . . are checking on the veracity and correctness of the balance allegedly outstanding in favor of the plaintiff manifested in paragraph 6 of the same, they, by virtue thereof, specifically deny it for lack of knowledge and belief as to the truth of the allegations embodied in the aforestated paragraph.

does not tender a genuine issue. In fact they admit that they are indebted to the plaintiff. As the affidavit subscribed and sworn to by the Manager of the Special Assets Department of the plaintiff, in charge of all outstanding accounts of its debtors, attached to the motion for summary judgment, furnishes the Court with the payments made by the defendants on their account and the amount due from them, which they failed to oppose by counter affidavits, the plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment. (1)

The judgment appealed from is affirmed, with costs against the appellants.

Paras, C.J., Bengzon, Montemayor, Reyes A., Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Reyes J.B.L. and Endencia, JJ., concur.

Endnotes:



1. See Londres v. National Life Insurance Company of the Philippines, 94 Phil., 627; Jugador v. Vera, 94 Phil., 704; Capital Insurance & Surety Company, Inc. v. Elberly, 100 Phil., 398; 53 Off. Gaz. 64.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1959 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-12163 March 4, 1959 - PAZ FORES v. IRENEO MIRANDA

    105 Phil 267

  • G.R. No. L-10460 March 11, 1959 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. JUANA B. VDA. DE DEL ROSARIO

    105 Phil 277

  • G.R. No. L-10611 March 13, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VIRGILIO DIVINAGRACIA

    105 Phil 281

  • G.R. No. L-11223 March 16, 1959 - PABLO C. VENTURA v. JUDGE NICASIO YATCO

    105 Phil 287

  • G.R. No. L-11596 March 16, 1959 - ALTO SURETY & INSURANCE CO. INC. v. ELEUTERIO LIMCACO, ET AL.

    105 Phil 295

  • G.R. No. L-11981 March 17, 1959 - CIRIACO SANTIAGO v. MANUEL CONDE

    105 Phil 298

  • G.R. No. L-11315 March 18, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EUSTAQUIO HINAUT

    105 Phil 303

  • G.R. No. L-11741 March 18, 1959 - EL AHORRO INSULAR, ET AL. v. VICTORINO T. AQUINO

    105 Phil 307

  • G.R. No. L-14891 March 19, 1959 - ALFREDO B. SAULO v. PELAGIO CRUZ

    105 Phil 315

  • G.R. No. L-13204 March 20, 1959 - ENRIQUE C. SERVO v. MARIANO ALCANABA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 322

  • G.R. No. L-9724 March 23, 1959 - TOMAS B. BERVA v. THE CITY MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER OF NAGA CITY

    105 Phil 325

  • G.R. No. L-12343 March 23, 1959 - LUNETA MOTOR COMPANY v. ALFONSO LOPEZ

    105 Phil 327

  • G.R. No. L-12497 March 23, 1959 - PRIMITIVO A. MACARAIG v. VICENTE DY SUN

    105 Phil 332

  • G.R. No. L-12695 March 23, 1959 - CITY OF ILOILO v. REMEDIOS SIAN VILLANUEVA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 337

  • G.R. No. L-12698 March 23, 1959 - PHIL. NATIONAL BANK v. PHIL. SURETY & INSURANCE COMPANY

    105 Phil 344

  • G.R. Nos. 11928-11930 March 24, 1959 - VEDASTO JESALVA, ET AL. v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA, ET AL.

    105 Phil 348

  • G.R. No. L-10883 March 25, 1959 - TERESA REALTY v. STATE CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLY CO., ET AL.

    105 Phil 353

  • G.R. Nos. L- 12078-79 March 25, 1959 - MATIAS BELARMINO v. PANTALEON F. ALIHAN

    105 Phil 358

  • G.R. No. L-12703 March 25, 1959 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXIMA ORPILLA-MOLINA

    105 Phil 362

  • G.R. No. L-11472 March 30, 1959 - OBDULIA ARAGON, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO ARAGON, ET AL.

    105 Phil 365

  • G.R. No. L-11569 March 30, 1959 - ROGERIO GENDRALA v. TEOFISTO CORDOVA

    105 Phil 370

  • G.R. No. L-12729 March 30, 1959 - ARSENIO R. REYES v. MARCIAL DE LA CRUZ, ET AL.

    105 Phil 372

  • G.R. No. L-12944 March 30, 1959 - MARIA NATIVIDAD VDA. DE TAN v. VETERANS BACKPAY COMMISSION

    105 Phil 377

  • G.R. No. L-13298 March 30, 1959 - JOSE U. OCHATE v. DIEGO H. TY DELING, ET AL.

    105 Phil 384

  • G.R. No. L-7954 March 31, 1959 - B. A. CRUMB v. MARGARITO RODRIGUEZ

    105 Phil 391

  • G.R. No. L-10884 March 31, 1959 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. PHILIPPINE LEATHER CO. INC.

    105 Phil 400

  • G.R. No. L-11785 March 31, 1959 - GABINO BACHOCO v. IGNACIA ESPERANCILLA

    105 Phil 404

  • G.R. No. L-12064 March 31, 1959 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ROBERTO ZURBANO

    105 Phil 409

  • G.R. No. L-12104 March 31, 1959 - CASIMIRO GARGANTA, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

    105 Phil 412

  • G.R. No. L-12128 March 31, 1959 - BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS v. ANTONIO NOBLEJAS

    105 Phil 418

  • G.R. No. L-12282 March 31, 1959 - BOARD OF DIRECTORS v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

    105 Phil 426

  • G.R. No. L-12592 March 31, 1959 - TIBURCIO SOMERA, ET AL. v. AGRIPINO GALMAN, ET AL.

    105 Phil 431