Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1962 > January 1962 Decisions > G.R. No. L-16836 January 30, 1962 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. BIENVENIDO SANVICTORES:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-16836. January 30, 1962.]

J. M. TUASON & CO., INC., represented by its managing partner, the GREGORIO ARANETA, INC., and HON. NICASIO YATCO, Judge of the Court of First Instance of Rizal (Quezon City, Branch V), Petitioners, v. BIENVENIDO SANVICTORES, Respondent.

Araneta & Araneta for Petitioner.

Antonio B. Alcera for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. PLEADINGS AND PRACTICE; COMPULSORY COUNTERCLAIMS; WAIVED IF NOT SET UP. — Appellee’s right to take steps to enforce his supposed preference to buy the contested lot was in the nature of a compulsory counterclaim under section 6 of Rule 10 of the Rules of Court, since it was necessarily connected with the right of possession asserted by appellant, and did not require the presence of third parties for its adjudication. Both under section 6 of Rule 10, and section 10 of Rule 9, the failure to set up such rights resulted in a waiver thereof, and became barred after the judgment in the possessory action became final.

2. COURT OF APPEALS; JURISDICTION; WRITS IN AID OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION. — Writs of certiorari, prohibition, etc., can only be issued by the Court of Appeals in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. Hence, that Court has no jurisdiction to entertain a petition for certiorari in a case where no questions of fact were raised in connection with the execution of the final judgment of the Court of First Instance, the only question being of law: whether or not execution should be further suspended because of the pendency of a suit for specific performance.


D E C I S I O N


REYES, J.B.L., J.:


Application for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals (Sixth Division), in its Case No. 26805-R, setting aside the orders of execution and demolition issued by the Court of First Instance of Quezon City in its Civil Case No. Q-3519, and ordering said Court to hold in abeyance such execution until final judgment is rendered in Civil Case No. 4809, pending before the same. We granted certiorari on July 26, 1960.

The following facts appear of record: Respondent Bienvenido Sanvictores occupies a portion of the so-called Tatalon Estate, of which petitioner J. M. Tuason & Co., Inc. is the registered owner holding a Torres certificate covering it. Said portion is designated as Lot 49 of the Veteran’s Subdivision plan, and appears to have been purchased in 1949 by Sanvictores from one Pedro Deudor, who claimed title to the estate as against the registered owners. Sanvictores had been in possession since then, and erected a house and made other improvements estimated at P20,000, more or less.

Litigation between the Tuasons, as registered owners, and Deudor culminated in a deed of compromise executed on March 16, 1953, wherein Deudor recognized the title of Tuason over the estate, and the latter agreed to pay certain compensation. The agreement expressly mentioned the rights of the previous vendees of Deudor, the latter agreeing to make them recognize the Tuason ownership and sign new contracts of purchase of their respective lots at the current prices and terms specified by the Tuasons in selling lots of their Sta. Mesa Heights Subdivision.

On November 20, 1958, Tuason & Co., filed in the Court of First Instance an ejectment action (accion publiciana) against Sanvictores to recover Lot 49 (Case No. Q-3519). After due trial, Judgment was rendered on March 30, 1959, declaring Sanvictores without right to the possession of the lot and ordering him to vacate it. No appeal was taken, hence the judgment became final and executory. On July 29, 1959, a writ of execution was issued.

Upon motion of defendant (now respondent) Sanvictores, the Court of First Instance, by order dated September 26, 1959, suspended execution of its judgment, granting Sanvictores 60 days within which

"to voluntarily remove his house and other constructions there from as well as to make proper negotiations with the plaintiff in connection therewith, after which period the correspondent writ of demolition will be accordingly issued."cralaw virtua1aw library

It seems that since May of 1959, Sanvictores had been bargaining for the purchase of Lot 49, but no contract was ever concluded because the parties could not agree as to the price. Wherefore, on November 20, 1959, six days before the suspension period expired, Sanvictores filed another case (Q-4809) in the same Court, asking that a fair and equitable price be fixed for Lot 49, and that Tuason & Co. be compelled to convey the lot to him, as preferential purchaser under the Deudor-Tuason compromise of 1953. Five days later, the same party move in the ejectment case (NO. Q-3519) for indefinite suspension of the execution. This motion was denied on December 2, 1959. Thereupon, Sanvictores sought out a writ of certiorari in the Court of Appeals and the latter, after due hearing, granted it as noted at the beginning of his opinion.

Not satisfied with the decision, Tuason & Co. resorted to this Court.

We find with the appeal meritorious.

Assuming, without deciding, that the Tuasons had really bound themselves to recognize the alleged preferential rights of the vendees of Deudor, it is more than remarkable that appellee Sanvictores, one of the vendees, did not take steps to enforce his supposed preference until after the adverse decision of the Court of First Instance in the possessory action had become final and executory in 1959, six years after the Deudor-Tuason compromise was made. This inaction of Sancvictores is all the more strange when we consider that he could have set up such preferential rights as a defense against the suit filed by appellant Tuason & Company against him. If he really was entitled to purchase the contested lot, the claim was in the nature of a compulsory counterclaim under section 6 of Rule 10, since it was necessarily connected with the right of possession asserted by the Tuasons, and did not require the presence of third parties for its adjudication. Both under section 6 of Rule 10, as well as section 10 of Rule 9, the failure to set up such rights resulted in a waiver thereof, and they became barred after the judgment in the possessory action became final. It was, therefore, error on the part of the Court of Appeals to consider that the determination of appellee’s alleged preferential right constituted a prejudicial question to the execution of the final judgment of ouster against appellee.

And if it be considered that the action of Sanvictores to compel Tuason & Company to sell him the lot is completely independent of the possessory action filed by the Tuasons, because it concerned title and not possession, then with greater reason will the pendency of the first action be irrelevant to the execution of the final judgment of ouster.

It is also worthy of note that the compromise between Deudor and Tuason, upon which Sanvictores predicates his right to buy the lot he occupies has been validly rescinded and set aside, as recognized by this Court in its decision in G. R. No. L-13768, Deudor v. Tuason, promulgated on May 30, 1961.

Finally, no questions of fact were raised in connection with the execution of the final judgment of the Court of First Instance of Quezon City in G.R. No. Q-3519 of that Court. The only question was one of law, whether or not execution should be further suspended because of the pendency of Sanvictores’ suit for specific performance (Case No. Q-4809). No appeal, therefore could have been taken thereon to the Court of Appeals; and as the writs of certiorari, prohibition, etc. can only be issued by that Court in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, it becomes plain that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain Sanvictores’ petition for certiorari; wherefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals; now under review; was null and void (Tuason & Co., Inc., etc. v. CA, G.R. No. L-18128, December 26, 1961, and cases therein cited).

IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and set aside. Costs against appellee, Bienvenido Sanvictores.

Bengzon, C.J., Padilla, Bautista Angelo, Labrador, Concepcion, Barrera, Dizon and De Leon, JJ., concur.

Paredes, J., did not take part.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1962 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-19313 January 19, 1962 - DOMINADOR R. AYTONA v. ANDRES V. CASTILLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17076 January 29, 1962 - AUGUSTO G. GAMBOA v. BIENVENIDO A. TAN

  • G.R. No. L-17078 January 29, 1962 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. FRANCISCO BUENASEDA

  • G.R. No. L-17079 January 29, 1962 - BRAULIO CASTILLO, ET AL. v. SIMPLICIA NAGTALON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-11037 January 30, 1962 - EDGARDO CARIAGA, ET AL. v. LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17248 January 29, 1962 - BEATRIZ GALANG v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12141 January 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MIGUEL LASALA

  • G.R. No. L-12487 January 30, 1962 - CASTOR CUSTODIO v. PEDRO T. CRISTOBAL, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14662 January 30, 1962 - GENOVEVA BELTRAN, ET AL. v. CORAZON AYSON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14715 January 30, 1962 - MARCELA JULIAN, ET AL. v. MARTA GONZALES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14913 January 30, 1962 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. v. ZOILO HILARIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15047 January 30, 1962 - IN RE: DIONISIO PALARAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-15539 January 30, 1962 - J. M. TUASON & CO. INC. v. ADOLFO MAGDANGAL

  • G.R. No. L-15964 January 30, 1962 - EZEQUIEL S. CONSULTA v. NICASlO YATCO, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15974 January 30, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PASCUAL SILVA

  • G.R. No. L-16020 January 30, 1962 - VICENTE FRAGANTE v. PEOPLE’S HOMESITE and HOUSING CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-16667 January 30, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16693-4-5 January 30, 1962 - GODOFREDO I. MOSUELA, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY

  • G.R. No. L-16796 January 30, 1962 - ALEJANDRO ABAO, ET AL. v. J.M. TUASON & CO., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16836 January 30, 1962 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC. v. BIENVENIDO SANVICTORES

  • G.R. No. L-16956 January 30, 1962 - SALVACION FERIA VDA. DE POTENCIANO v. WILLIAM GRUENBERG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16959 January 30, 1962 - IN RE: DONATA MONTEMAYOR v. EDUARDO D. GUTIERREZ

  • G.R. No. L-16970 January 30, 1962 - ELOY B. BELLO v. VALENTIN A. FERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-17384 January 30, 1962 - NESTORA RIGOR VDA. DE QUIAMBAO, ET AL. v. MANILA MOTOR COMPANY, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17398 January 30, 1962 - ARSENIO H. LACSON, ET AL. v. SANTOS VILLAFRANCA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17689 January 30, 1962 - JOSE BELEY v. GENARO TAN TORRES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17936 January 30, 1962 - CITY OF LEGASPI v. MATEO L. ALCASID, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12396 January 31, 1962 - KER & COMPANY, LTD. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12960 January 31, 1962 - CIRILO VENTURA, ET AL. v. ANASTACIA BAYSA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-12996 January 31, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. ANTONIO ALBERT

  • G.R. No. L-13374 January 31, 1962 - FRANCISCO BAUTISTA v. GERARDO MURILLO

  • G.R. No. L-13439 January 31, 1962 - DOMESTIC INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-13656 January 31, 1962 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ALBERTO D. BENIPAYO

  • G.R. No. L-13924 January 31, 1962 - JACOBO DIVINO v. RAMONA FABIE DE MARCOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14106 January 31, 1962 - EMILIANA EMPAMANO, ET AL. v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

  • G.R. No. L-14834 January 31, 1962 - TOMAS ALVAREZ, ET AL. v. BOARD OF LIQUIDATORS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-14891 January 31, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FILADELFO S. ROJAS

  • G.R. No. L-15079 January 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. GUILLERMO I. VENTURA

  • G.R. Nos. L-15447-48 January 31, 1962 - ALLIED WORKERS ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. PHILIPPINE LAND-AIR-SEA LABOR UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15976 January 31, 1962 - APOLONIO DE LOS SANTOS v. BENJAMIN V. LIMBAGA, ETC.

  • G.R. No. L-16386 January 31, 1962 - RAMON VELEZ v. GABINO SAAVEDRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16460 January 31, 1962 - ADELA SILPAO v. LOPE PAGLOMOTAN

  • G.R. No. L-16474 January 31, 1962 - TOMAS B. TADEO v. PROVINCIAL FISCAL OF PANGASINAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16480 January 31, 1962 - ARTEMIO KATIGBAK v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16513 January 31, 1962 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PAZ ARGUELLES VDA. DE LAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16550 January 31, 1962 - ALLEN McCONN v. PAUL HARAGAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16558 January 31, 1962 - CASIANO MAGISTRADO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16629 January 31, 1962 - SOUTHERN LINES, INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16661 January 31, 1962 - CLARA DILUANGCO PALANCA, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16662 January 31, 1962 - VET BROS. & CO., INC. v. JOSE S. MOVIDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-16668 and L-16669 January 31, 1962 - J. M. TUASON & CO., INC., ETC. v. BIENVENIDO DE LEON

  • G.R. No. L-16683 January 31, 1962 - ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF CEBU v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. Nos. L-16696 and L-16702 January 31, 1962 - LUCIANO ESCOSURA, ET AL. v. SAN MIGUEL BREWERY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-16714 January 31, 1962 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MAXENCIO MORADO

  • G.R. No. L-16741 January 31, 1962 - FLORENCIA Q. DE ABRAHAM, ET AL. v. PRISCILLA RECTO- KASTEN

  • G.R. No. L-16809 January 31, 1962 - UNION GARMENT CO., INC. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16872 January 31, 1962 - THEODORE LEWIN v. DEPORTATION BOARD

  • G.R. No. L-16897 January 31, 1962 - GREGORIO M. MATAS v. HONORIO ROMERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16926 January 31, 1962 - FELIPE TANCHOCO v. GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-17240 January 31, 1962 - CLEMENCIA B. VDA. DE VILLONGCO, ET AL. v. FLORENCIO MORENO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17250 January 31, 1962 - JOSE DE LUNA GONZALES, ET AL. v. GENEROSA DE LEON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17335 January 31, 1962 - RAUL H. TANPINCO v. ANTONIO T. LOZADA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17436 January 31, 1962 - EQUITABLE INSURANCE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, INC. v. RURAL INSURANCE AND SURETY COMPANY, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-17451 January 31, 1962 - DOMINADOR S. ASIS v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17533 January 31, 1962 - PHILIPPINE ENGINEER’S SYNDICATE, INC. v. FLORA S. MARTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17564 January 31, 1962 - ARTURO DE SANTOS, ET AL. v. PETRONILO ACOSTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17746 and L-17807 January 31, 1962 - ALEJANDRO FACUNDO v. JAVIER PABALAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19260 January 31, 1962 - DELFIN ALBANO v. MANUEL ARRANZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16956 January 30, 1962 - SALVACION FERIA VDA. DE POTENCIANO v. WILLIAM GRUENBERG, ET AL.