Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1966 > June 1966 Decisions > G.R. No. L-21122 June 23, 1966 CELESTINO E. ESUERTE, ET AL. v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-21122. June 23, 1966.]

CELESTINO E. ESUERTE, MARIA BITOY, HONORATO LUCERO, and ANATALIO BARCENA, Petitioners, v. HON. MACAPANTON ABBAS, in his capacity as Presiding Judge, Sala II Court of First Instance of Davao, HON. SALVADOR R. MARIÑO, DELFIN JAMPAYAS, ET AL., Respondents.

Aportadera & Palabrica, for Petitioners.

Solicitor General Arturo A. Alafriz, Assistant Solicitor General A. G. Ibarra and Solicitor B. P. Pardo, for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. PUBLIC OFFICERS; APPOINTMENTS; MIDNIGHT APPOINTMENTS; CASE AT BAR. — In L-23301 (Escuerte, Et. Al. v. Jampayas, Et. Al.) prom. Feb. 28, 1966, the ad interim appointments of petitioners Escuerte, Et Al., extended by President Garcia on December 29, 1961, were declared part of the "midnight" appointments covered by the ruling laid down in the Aytona v. Castillo case (L-19313, January 19, 1962). In effect, therefore, the designations by President Macapagal of respondents Jampayas, Et Al., to the disputed positions were upheld. Held: In view of the resolution of the controversy in the main case, the issue in the present action, which is merely an accident in the main case, has become moot and academic.


D E C I S I O N


BARRERA, J.:


This is an original petition for certiorari to question the correctness of the order of the Court of First Instance of Davao, denying petitioner’s motion for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction in Special Civil Case No. 3950 of said court.

Following the designation by President Macapagal, on January 25, 1963, of Delfin Jampayas, as Acting Mayor, Eulogio Viajedor, as Acting Vice-mayor, Antonio Macadangdang, Demetrio B. Hechanova, Ricardo Bitoy, and Francisco Esquerdo, as Acting Councilors of the municipality of Mawab, province of Davao, Celestino Esuerte, Maria Bitoy, Honorato Lucero, and Anatolio Barcena, who were extended ad interim appointments by President Garcia on December 29, 1961, 1 instituted prohibition and quo warranto proceedings in the Court of First Instance of Davao (Sp. Civ. Case No. 3950) to declare them (petitioners) lawfully entitled to the positions. As the court denied their prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction, to restrain respondents from entering the discharge of the functions of the offices, petitioners filed the instant action. It is here claimed that as rightful occupants of the disputed positions, they are entitled not only to the salaries attached thereto, but also to the peaceful, continuous, and uninterrupted exercise of the regular duties and functions of the office.

This petition was given due course in this Court, but no writ of preliminary injunction was issued. Thus, the trial of the main case (Sp. Civ. Case To. 3950) continued and on November 26, 1963, the court a quo rendered a decision dismissing the petition. Therein petitioners brought the case on appeal to this Court (G.R. No. L-23301).

In our decision of February 28, 1966 (in G.R. No. L-23301, Esuerte Et. Al. v. Jampayas Et. Al.), the ad-interim appointments of petitioners Esuerte, Et Al., extended by President Garcia on December 29, 1961 were declared part of the "midnight" appointments covered by the ruling laid down in the Aytona v. Castillo 2 case. In effect, therefore, the designations by President Macapagal of respondents Jampayas, Et. Al. to the disputed positions were upheld. In view of our resolution of the controversy in the main case, the issue in the present action, which is merely an incident in the main case, has become moot and academic.

WHEREFORE, this petition is hereby dismissed, without costs. So ordered.

Concepcion, C.J., J.B.L. Reyes, Regala, Makalintal, J.P. Bengzon, Zaldivar and Sanchez, JJ., concur.

Dizon, J., on leave, took no part.

Endnotes:



1. Esuerte, as Mayor, Bitoy as Vice-Mayor, and Lucero and Barcena as Councilors of the same Municipality.

2. G.R. No. L-19313, Jan. 19, 1962.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






June-1966 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-23964 June 1, 1966 GREGORIO V. GAERLAN, JR. v. LUIS C. CATUBIG

  • G.R. No. L-19697 June 3, 1966 CESAR TUMULAK, ET AL. v. AMADOR E. GOMEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-15795 June 20, 1966 IN RE: ANG DIT KUE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-18207 June 20, 1966 IN RE: JOVENCIO CHI v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-19638 June 20, 1966 FILIPINAS COMPAÑIA DE SEGUROS, ET AL. v. FRANCISCO Y. MANDANAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20705 June 20, 1966 LUZON SURETY CO., INC. v. RAFAEL P. GUERRERO, SR., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20789 June 20, 1966 CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC. v. LUIS B. REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-16987 June 21, 1966 IN RE: AMADO ONG APACIBLE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20798 June 21, 1966 OSCAR JACOB v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS

  • G.R. No. L-21993 June 21, 1966 ANGELA RODRIGUEZ, ET AL. v. JUAN DE BORJA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22437 June 21, 1966 IN RE: FRANCISCO LIM v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-25419 June 21, 1966 ANDRES CULANAG v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS

  • G.R. No. L-17670 June 23, 1966 IN RE: CHING CHONG ANG TAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-19268 June 23, 1966 IN RE: ONG CHUAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21122 June 23, 1966 CELESTINO E. ESUERTE, ET AL. v. MACAPANTON ABBAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21173 June 23, 1966 MELECIO B. QUETULIO, ET AL. v. ILDEFONSO GANITANO

  • G.R. No. L-23445 June 23, 1966 REMEDIOS NUGUID v. FELIX NUGUID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23509 June 23, 1966 NATY BALTAZAR, ET AL. v. SILVINA CARIDAD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-17124 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI C. FAMILIAR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21781 June 30, 1966 DELGADO BROTHERS, INC., ET AL. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22352 June 30, 1966 IN RE: ENGRACIO CHAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17666 June 30, 1966 ISIDORO MONDRAGON v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-17970 June 30, 1966 MARIA MAHILUM, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18209 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. VENANCIO SULLANO

  • G.R. No. L-18257 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ARMANDO G. FAJARDO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18537 June 30, 1966 DOMINGO FLORES, ET AL. v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19091 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SEVERO CORONEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19651 June 30, 1966 ALLIED FREE WORKERS UNION, ET AL. v. MANUEL ESTIPONA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20183 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDUARDO I. BERDIDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20350 June 30, 1966 DIRECTOR OF LANDS v. NEMESIO ACANA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20605 June 30, 1966 IN RE: TANPA ONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-20739 June 30, 1966 CRISTINA CHINGAN v. GABRIEL LA GUARDIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-20754 and L-20759 June 30, 1966 PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. CARMEN SARIO

  • G.R. No. L-21077 June 30, 196

    IN RE: ADELAIDO DE GUZMAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21348 June 30, 1966 RED V COCONUT PRODUCTS, LTD. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21574 June 30, 1966 SIMON DE LA CRUZ v. CAPITAL INSURANCE & SURETY CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-21959 June 30, 1966 IN RE: GENARO YAP v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22610 June 30, 1966 PRIMITIVO P. QUIEM v. JESUS SERIÑA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23305 June 30, 1966 BENEDICTO C. LAGMAN v. CITY OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-17411 June 30, 1966 LUZON STEVEDORING CORPORATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24365 June 30, 1966 IN RE: ADOLFO C. AZNAR v. MARIA LUCY CHRISTENSEN DUNCAN

  • G.R. No. L-17411 June 30, 1966 LUZON STEVEDORING CORPORATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.