Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > July 1967 Decisions > A.C. No. 483 July 21, 1967 - GIL DE LOS SANTOS v. MARIO BOLANOS:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[A.C. No. 483. July 21, 1967.]

GIL DE LOS SANTOS, Complainant, v. MARIO BOLANOS, Respondent.

Abel G. Flores for the complainant.

Solicitor General Antonio P. Barredo for investigator.

German G. Vilgera for Respondent.


SYLLABUS


1. ATTORNEYS-AT-LAW; DISBARMENT; CASE AT BAR. — Complainant alleged that respondent was guilty of fraud for having misappropriated the sum of P4,200 out of a loan of P5,000 which the latter had obtained from the Philippine National Bank after mortgaging a piece of land over which the complainant claims ownership to the extent of 3/4 thereof. Held: Complainant claims that respondent never intended to comply with the terms of their agreement (Exh. B) and only resorted to it as a bait to bring about the dismissal of Civil Case 5087. We find no proof in the record of any such motive of deceit or fraud on the part of Respondent. It appears that when the respondent recognized the complainant as owner of 3/4 of the land, it was on the belief, as represented by complainant that the latter was a son of Andres de los Santos, which representation, however, turned out to be false as proofs were found later on to belie the complainant’s pretense of his paternity with Andres de los Santos. Elisa Rañola discovered from complainant’s baptismal certificate that he was the son of Ramon Epifanio, but not of Andres de los Santos with his first wife, Genoveva de Claro. No less than a sister of the deceased confirmed the fact that he was the son of her brother. Arrayed with such proofs showing the falsity of his claim as a son of Andres de los Santos, complainant voluntarily agreed to cancel the agreement entered into by and between him and the respondent, and in a memorandum handwritten by him, he recognized respondent’s ownership of the land. There appearing to be no sufficient ground to hold respondent liable for unethical conduct as a member of the legal profession, the case against him is hereby dismissed.


R E S O L U T I O N


ANGELES, J.:


A complaint for disbarment was filed by one Gil de los Santos against Atty. Mario L. Bolaños, an assistant provincial fiscal of Camarines Sur. Narrating a long story, complainant alleges that respondent was guilty of fraud for having misappropriated the sum of P4,200.00 out of a loan of P5,000.00 which the latter had obtained from the Philippine National Bank after mortgaging a piece of land over which the complainant claims ownership to the extent of 3/4 thereof.

The answer, denying some of the allegations in the complaint, presents respondent’s own version of the case, and claims that he committed no wrong to complainant as the latter has no right to the land mortgaged to the PNB.

The case was referred to the Solicitor General for investigation and said official has now submitted his report thereon.

It appears that the late Andres de los Santos, who died on March 11, 1959, had a parcel of land of about 21 hectares, situated in Barrera, Lupi, Camarines Sur, covered by Original Certificate of Title No. 27, which was issued to him after he married his second wife, Elisa Rañola. Upon the death of Andres, and claiming to be his only heir, Elisa Rañola executed an affidavit of summary settlement of the estate of her husband and thereupon the title to the land was issued in her name (T.C.T. No. 3053). On September 12, 1960, Rañola sold the land to the respondent for P8,500.00 and the latter, in turn, secured title in his name (T.C.T. No. 3289).

On December 27, 1960, the complainant filed Civil Case No. 5087 with the Court of First Instance of Camarines Sur against Rañola and the respondent, for partition of the land mentioned above, alleging that he was the son of Andres de los Santos by the latter’s first wife. Believing in the truth of this allegation, the respondent entered into an "AGREEMENT" with the complainant (Exh. B), pertinent portion of which reads:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"2. That a certain Gil de los Santos claiming that he is the only heir of Andres de los Santos with his first wife Genoveva de Claro, explained to me that he owns three-fourths (3/4) of the land covered by TCT-3053 (originally OCT-27) of the land I bought from Elisa Rañola constituting his inheritance from his late parents;

3. That believing that I am the owner of only ONE-FOURTH (1/4) of said land, I offered to sell this portion to Gil de los Santos;

4. That Gil de los Santos has no money to buy one-fourth (1/4) portion and we have agreed:chanrob1es virtual 1aw library

a. That if I can secure from the Development Bank of the Philippines an amount of ONE THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED (P1,500.00) PESOS or more by mortgaging the land sold to me by Elisa Rañola under TCT-3053, the amount of EIGHT HUNDRED (P800.00) PESOS and expenses of the loan will be retained by the undersigned and the remaining balance of the loan obtained will be delivered by him (Atty. Bolanos) to Gil de los Santos together with the sale of the entire 24.000 has. under TCT 3053, executed by the undersigned in favor of the latter.

b. That the consideration of the said deed of sale in favor of Gil de los Santos to be executed by the undersigned will be the amount of the loan that was granted by the Bank to the undersigned which will be assumed by Gil de los Santos."cralaw virtua1aw library

To give effect to the agreement, Rañola and the respondent had agreed to rescind the sale.

Thereafter, and before the respondent could apply for a loan with the DBP as agreed upon, Rañola discovered from a certain document that the complainant was not a son of Andres de los Santos. On February 2, 1961, Rañola, together with a sister of Andres de los Santos and the respondent, went to the office of complainant’s counsel, Atty. Abel Flores, and confronted complainant about his paternity, in the presence of the latter’s son, Alejandre de los Santos. After consultations among the complainant, his son and his lawyer, the complainant agreed to revoke the agreement above-quoted. This revocation is evidenced by a notation, in the Bicol dialect, at the left margin of the document, which was translated in English at the foot thereof, signed by the complainant and the respondent, and witnessed by complainant’s son, Alejandre de los Santos.

Subsequently, on February 9, 1961, Gil de los Santos signed an acknowledgment that the property belongs to respondent and that he is a mere tenant thereon. This was attested to by Alejandre de los Santos and one Marcelo Glorioso.

Upon complainant’s petition to the court for the dismissal of the case for partition, the same was dismissed. And in view of the cancellation of the agreement, Rañola’s sale of the property to the respondent was no longer rescinded.

Being the sole owner of the land, the respondent mortgaged it to the Philippine National Bank for P5,000. The complainant demanded on respondent to deliver to him the proceeds of the loan, less P800.00, anchoring his claim on the rescinded agreement with the respondent, and the latter having refused the demand, the instant complaint for disbarment of the respondent was filed.

The Solicitor General recommends the dismissal of the complaint, to which we are fully in accord, for the reason that there is no sufficient ground to proceed against the respondent inasmuch as the complainant has failed to substantiate the charges against the Respondent.

Complainant claims that respondent never intended to comply with the terms of their agreement (Exh. B) and only resorted to it as a bait to bring about the dismissal of Civil Case 5087. We find no proof in the record of any such motive of deceit or fraud on the part of Respondent. It appears that when the respondent recognized the complainant as the owner of 3/4 of the land, it was on the belief, as represented by the complainant, that the latter was a son of Andres de los Santos, which representation, however, turned out to be false as proofs were found later on to belie the complainant’s pretense of his paternity with Andres de los Santos. Elisa Rañola discovered from complainant’s baptismal certificate that he was the son of Ramon Epifanio, but not of Andres de los Santos with his first wife, Genoveva de Claro. No less than a sister of the deceased confirmed the fact that he was not a son of her brother. Arrayed with such proofs showing the falsity of his claim as a son of Andres de los Santos, complainant voluntarily agreed to cancel the agreement entered into by and between him and the respondent, and in a memorandum handwritten by him, he recognized the respondent’s ownership of the land.

There appearing to be no sufficient ground to hold the respondent liable for unethical conduct as a member of the legal profession, the case against him is hereby dismissed.

Reyes, J .B.L., Makalintal, Bengzon, J .P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, C.J. and Dizon, J., are on official leave of absence.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






July-1967 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-23258 July 1, 1967 - ROBERTO R. MONROY v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26532 July 10, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26237 July 10, 1967 - NORTH BRITISH & MERCANTILE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. ISTHMIAN LINES, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24704 July 10, 1967 - AUYONG HIAN v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19535 July 10, 1967 - PIO MINDANAO, ET AL. v. DIRECTOR OF LANDS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20086 July 10, 1967 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. SEGUNDO FERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-24520 July 11, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-23133 July 13, 1967 - VICENTE S. DEL ROSARIO, ET AL. v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25859 July 13, 1967 - FRANCISCO LOPEZ v. AUDITOR GENERAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-24340-44 July 18, 1967 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY v. ENRIQUE MEDINA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21054 July 18, 1967 - IN RE: MIGUEL CHUN ENG GO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-19600 July 19, 1967 - SECRETARY OF JUSTICE, ET AL. v. ENRIQUE MAGLANOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23176 & L-23177 July 20, 1967 - PABLO R. TONGCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23229 July 20, 1967 - ANDRES P. BARING v. CESAR M. CABAHUG

  • G.R. No. L-25662 July 21, 1967 - INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21495 July 21, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. POLICARPIO HALASAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22174 July 21, 1967 - ESPERANZA P. DE HARDEN v. FRED M. HARDEN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22356 July 21, 1967 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PEDRO B. PATANAO

  • G.R. No. L-23956 July 21, 1967 - ELPIDIO JAVELLANA v. NICOLAS LUTERO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23982 July 21, 1967 - DOMINGO ARAO, ET AL. v. ANTONIO R. LUSPO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24321 July 21, 1967 - PHILIPPINE AIR LINES, INC. v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23538 July 21, 1967 - CONSUELO VELAYO v. RODOLFO VELAYO

  • G.R. No. 24322 July 21, 1967 - IN RE: ORMOC SUGAR COMPANY, INC. v. MUNICIPAL BOARD OF ORMOC CITY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24989 July 21, 1967 - PEDRO GRAVADOR v. EUTIQUIO MAMIGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26222 July 21, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. HERNANDO PINEDA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26959 July 21, 1967 - OSCAR V. CO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27121 July 21, 1967 - JOSE OSCAR M. SALAZAR, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 483 July 21, 1967 - GIL DE LOS SANTOS v. MARIO BOLANOS

  • G.R. No. L-25515 July 24, 1967 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-18060 July 25, 1967 - REMIGIO JOAQUIN v. ISIDRA CUJUANGCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26245 July 25, 1967 - PABLO MONTEZA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26764 July 25, 1967 - BACHRACH TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC. v. RURAL TRANSIT SHOP EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23118 July 26, 1967 - POLICARPIO VIRAY, ET AL. v. CITY OF CALOOCAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26605 July 27, 1967 - PABLO D. SUAREZ, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27671 & L-27684-86 July 27, 1967 - PABLO DE GUZMAN v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-27477 July 28, 1967 - TEODORO JULIANO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. 19373 July 29, 1967 - FELIX ASEJO, ET AL. v. ADRIANO CHUA JOY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24693 July 31, 1967 - ERMITA-MALATE HOTEL AND MOTEL OPERATORS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL. v. CITY MAYOR OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-20560 July 31, 1967 - EMILIANO ACUÑA v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20649 July 31, 1967 - CHUC SIU, ET AL. v. THE LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRAR OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-21275 July 31, 1967 - ZAMBOANGA GENERAL UTILITIES, INC. v. SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21588 July 31, 1967 - ATLAS DEVELOPMENT AND ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION v. BENJAMIN M. GOZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22501 July 31, 1967 - MARIANO CALLEJA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22604 July 31, 1967 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO PORTUGUEZA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23002 July 31, 1967 - CONCEPCION FELIX VDA. DE RODRIGUEZ v. GERONIMO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24930 July 31, 1967 - SHELL REFINING COMPANY (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27492 July 31, 1967 - SALUSTIANO O. MANALO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.