July 1967 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1967 > July 1967 Decisions >
G.R. No. L-25515 July 24, 1967 - MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE, ET AL.:
EN BANC
[G.R. No. L-25515. July 24, 1967.]
MANILA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CUSTOMS ARRASTRE SERVICE and/or BUREAU OF CUSTOMS and/or REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Defendants-Appellees.
Ross, Selph, Salcedo, Del Rosario, Bito and Misa, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Solicitor General and Felipe Cuison for Defendants-Appellees.
SYLLABUS
1. BUREAU OF CUSTOMS; ARRASTRE SERVICE; SUABILITY. — As part of the governmental machinery, the Bureau of Customs, in operating the arrastre service, does so as an incident of a prime governmental function and as such may not be sued.
D E C I S I O N
BENGZON, J.P., J.:
Arriving from San Francisco, the SS "Japan Bear" on March 3, 1963, discharged into the custody of the arrastre service in Manila operated by the Bureau of Customs, two (2) boxes of printed matters, viz., valve charts, and 128 cartons of electric street light controls and spicing tape, consigned to Manila Electric Company. Of the shipment, two (2) cartons of electric street light controls worth P1,873.98 were not delivered.
After demands for recovery of the loss were not satisfied, the Manila Electric Company filed a complaint before the City Court of Manila against the Customs Arrastre Service and/or Bureau of Customs and/or the Republic of the Philippines, and obtained a judgment in its favor.
On appeal to the court of First Instance of Manila, the defendants moved to dismiss, after which they answered, alleging non- suability. Subsequently, plaintiff amended its complaint to stress the allegations of defendants’ capacity to sue and be sued and its prayer to hold defendants jointly and severally liable.
After hearing, the Court of First Instance on November 4, 1965 dismissed the case for the reason that the Republic of the Philippines, the Bureau of Customs (a mere agency f the Republic), and the Arrastre Service (a unit of the Bureau of Customs), may not be sued.
Appeal to Us has been taken by the plaintiff on its belief that the Republic of the Philippines in its operation of the arrastre service through the Bureau of Customs, may be sued.
In Mobil Philippines Exploration, Inc. v. Customs Arrastre Service and Bureau of Customs, L-23129 December 17, 1966, We already declared that as part of the governmental machinery, the Bureau of Customs, in operating the arrastre service, does so as an incident of a prime governmental function and as such may not be sued. The same holds true with the Republic of the Philippines.
Wherefore, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed. No costs. So ordered.
Reyes, J .B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.
Concepcion, C.J. and Dizon, J., are on official leave.
After demands for recovery of the loss were not satisfied, the Manila Electric Company filed a complaint before the City Court of Manila against the Customs Arrastre Service and/or Bureau of Customs and/or the Republic of the Philippines, and obtained a judgment in its favor.
On appeal to the court of First Instance of Manila, the defendants moved to dismiss, after which they answered, alleging non- suability. Subsequently, plaintiff amended its complaint to stress the allegations of defendants’ capacity to sue and be sued and its prayer to hold defendants jointly and severally liable.
After hearing, the Court of First Instance on November 4, 1965 dismissed the case for the reason that the Republic of the Philippines, the Bureau of Customs (a mere agency f the Republic), and the Arrastre Service (a unit of the Bureau of Customs), may not be sued.
Appeal to Us has been taken by the plaintiff on its belief that the Republic of the Philippines in its operation of the arrastre service through the Bureau of Customs, may be sued.
In Mobil Philippines Exploration, Inc. v. Customs Arrastre Service and Bureau of Customs, L-23129 December 17, 1966, We already declared that as part of the governmental machinery, the Bureau of Customs, in operating the arrastre service, does so as an incident of a prime governmental function and as such may not be sued. The same holds true with the Republic of the Philippines.
Wherefore, the decision appealed from is hereby affirmed. No costs. So ordered.
Reyes, J .B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.
Concepcion, C.J. and Dizon, J., are on official leave.
