Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > January 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-22145 January 30, 1968 - A. M. RAYMUNDO & CO. v. BENITO SYMACO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-22145. January 30, 1968.]

A. M. RAYMUNDO & CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BENITO SYMACO, Defendant-Appellee.

Lopez-de Joya, Dimaguila, Hermoso & Divino, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Javier S. Ranin, for Defendant-Appellee.


SYLLABUS


1. COURTS; JURISDICTION; COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE HAS JURISDICTION WHERE ISSUE INVOLVED IS OWNERSHIP, NOT MERE POSSESSION. — The dismissal must be sustained where in the case for forcible entry instituted in the Municipal Court, the appellee raised the question of ownership, which issue he again raised on appeal in the Court of First Instance where it appeared upon trial that the true question between the parties was ownership and that the Municipality of Malabon itself was affected by the controversy.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


Appeal by A. M. Raymundo & Co. from the order of January 12, 1961 of the Court of First Instance of Rizal in Civil Case No. 4677 dismissing its appeal from the decision of the Justice of the Peace Court of Malabon, in turn dismissing its complaint for forcible entry filed against Benito Symaco.

On June 28, 1967 appellant filed with the abovementioned Justice of the Peace Court a complaint for forcible entry, with a prayer for the issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction, against appellee, the main allegations of which were that it was the owner of a parcel of land situated in Malabon, Rizal with an area of approximately 328 square meters, covered by TCT No. 39853 of the Register of Deeds of Rizal; that on or about June 21, 1957, appellee, unlawfully and by means of force, strategy and stealth, entered upon a portion of 32.42 square meters of said land and had been constructing a building thereon.

Answering the complaint, appellee alleged that he was the owner of the parcel of land in question, having acquired the same by purchase from appellant itself on July 21, 1954, as evidenced by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 3560 of the Register of Deeds of Rizal issued in his name; that, as the issue between the parties was one of ownership, the court had no jurisdiction over the case; and that, because of the unfounded action, he suffered actual and moral damages in the sum of P2,000.00.

Finding that the issue involved was ownership and not mere possession, the Justice of the Peace Court dismissed the case. Appellant then took the case on appeal to the Court of First Instance of Rizal. At the pre-trial held thereat, the Court made a preliminary finding that appellee had encroached upon a portion of about 70 centimeters, along the side of Calle Real, of the property described in the Plan SWO-63711 beyond the boundary of his property as described in said plan. As a result, the court ordered the parties to submit "such pleadings as, in their opinion, would be necessary regarding the ownership of the property in question and the Court will thereafter then define whether it will act in its appellate or original jurisdiction."cralaw virtua1aw library

In view of the order mentioned above, appellee moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground of lack of jurisdiction of the court a quo. The court, however, postponed its resolution thereon until after the presentation of the evidence by the parties. Thereafter the court appointed Mamerto Infante, supervising surveyor of the Bureau of Lands, as commissioner, to conduct a relocation survey of the land covered by appellant’s title in order to ascertain whether a portion thereof had been included in appellee’s title or whether said parcel of land was a part of Calle Real in Malabon. In his report submitted to the court, Infante stated that appellee was actually occupying a portion of 5.51 square meters of appellant’s land but which also formed part of Calle Real, as shown by the sketch plan attached to the report.

On December 29, 1959, the court, upon a verified motion of appellant, issued a writ of preliminary injunction prohibiting appellee from making any construction on the questioned area. The latter’s motion for a reconsideration of said order was denied.

On the date set for hearing, appellee’s counsel called the court’s attention to his previous unresolved motion to dismiss the appeal. In this connection the court ordered him to file a formal motion to dismiss based on the evidence already presented — which order was complied with. Thereafter, finding that the evidence of record tended to show that the issue of ownership was necessarily involved in the proceedings, the Court issued the appealed order with the following alternative to the parties:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

". . . However, if the parties would express their intention to have this case heard under the original jurisdiction of the Court, the Court will be willing to hear the same and decide it on the merits so long as proper pleadings necessary for the determination of all the issues will be filed. As a consequence of this order of dismissal, the Court hereby dissolves the writ of preliminary injunction issued."cralaw virtua1aw library

Instead of submitting the controversy to the court in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, as suggested above, appellant interposed the present appeal.

The foregoing facts show that the present appeal is without merit.

From the time the case was instituted in the Municipal Court of Malabon, appellant raised the question of ownership. He raised it again on appeal in the Court of First Instance of Rizal. The proceedings had in said court, as stated heretofore, clearly show, not only that the true question between the herein parties is ownership, but that the Municipality of Malabon is also affected by the controversy. There is no doubt, therefore, that the Municipal Court of Malabon and the Court of First Instance of Rizal were right in dismissing the case. Wherefore, the order of dismissal appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Ruiz Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






January-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-23542 January 2, 1968 - JUANA T. VDA. DE RACHO v. MUNICIPALITY OF ILAGAN

  • G.R. No. L-23988 January 7, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. LEONARDO S. VILLA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24922 January 2, 1968 - MELECIO DOREGO, ET AL. v. ARISTON PEREZ

  • G.R. No. L-24108 January 3, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24190 January 8, 1968 - RAFAEL FALCOTELO, ET AL. v. RESTITUTO GALI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24432 January 12, 1968 - NAZARIO EQUIZABAL v. APOLONIO G. MALENIZA

  • G.R. No. L-22294 January 12, 1968 - DIONISIA PARAMI VDA. DE CABASAG v. AMADOR P. SU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22991 January 16, 1968 - BIENVENIDO CAPULONG v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-23293 January 16, 1968 - LUIS R. AYO, JR. v. MELQUIADES G. ILAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24480 January 16, 1968 - LUCRECIO DE GUZMAN, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-22794 January 16, 1968 - RUFO QUEMUEL v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22018 January 17, 1968 - APOLONIO GALOFA v. NEE BON SING

  • G.R. No. L-22081 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTOS M. CABANERO

  • G.R. No. L-22605 January 17, 1968 - CEBU PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

  • G.R. No. L-23690 January 17, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO

  • G.R. No. L-24230 January 17, 1968 - EUGENIA TORNILLA v. TEODORICA FUENTESPINA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24434 January 17, 1968 - PEDRO REGANON, ET AL. v. RUFINO IMPERIAL

  • G.R. No. L-28459 January 17, 1968 - RAFAEL FALCOTELO, ET AL. v. MACARIO ASISTIO

  • G.R. No. L-22518 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RICARDO ATENCIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23707 January 17, 1968 - JOSE A.V. CORPUS v. FEDERICO C. ALIKPALA

  • G.R. No. L-26103 January 17, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELMER ESTRADA

  • G.R. No. L-19255 January 18, 1968 - PHILIPPINE AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. AUDITOR GENERAL

  • G.R. No. L-24707 January 18, 1968 - JOSE S. CAPISTRANO v. JUAN BOGAR

  • G.R. No. L-24946 January 18, 1968 - MARTINIANO P. VIVO v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-23116 January 24, 1968 - IN RE: ANTONIO JAO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24287 January 24, 1968 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION COMPANY, INC. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-22985 January 24, 1968 - BATANGAS TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. GREGORIO CAGUIMBAL, ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-18546 & L-18547 January 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PRUDENCIO OPINIANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19752 January 29, 1968 - LAND SETTLEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. AGUSTIN CARLOS

  • G.R. No. L-23555 January 29, 1968 - FLOREÑA TINAGAN v. VALERIO V. ROVIRA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22468 January 29, 1968 - PUAHAY LAO v. DIMTOY SUAREZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24607 January 29, 1968 - TOMAS TRIA TIRONA v. CITY TREASURER OF MANILA

  • G.R. No. L-24795 January 29, 1968 - PEDRO JIMENEA v. ROMEO G. GUANZON, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20449 January 29, 1968 - ESPERANZA FABIAN, ET AL. v. SILBINA FABIAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28415 January 29, 1968 - ESTRELLO T. ONG v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23012 January 29, 1968 - MIGUEL CUENCO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23052 January 29, 1968 - CITY OF MANILA v. GENERO M. TEOTICO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28518 January 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LORENZO G. PADERNA

  • G.R. No. L-18971 January 29, 1968 - IN RE: ABUNDIO ROTAQUIO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21718 January 29, 1968 - MILAGROS F. VDA. DE FORTEZA v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28392 January 29, 1968 - JOSE C. AQUINO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27268 January 29, 1968 - JUANITA JUAN-MARCELO, ET AL. v. GO KIM PAH, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22145 January 30, 1968 - A. M. RAYMUNDO & CO. v. BENITO SYMACO

  • G.R. No. L-22686 January 30, 1968 - BERNARDO JOCSON, ET AL. v. REDENCION GLORIOSO

  • G.R. No. L-24073 January 30, 1968 - PAMPANGA SUGAR MILLS v. REGINA GALANG VDA. DE ESPELETA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27583 January 30, 1968 - MARGARITO J. LOFRANCO v. JESUS JIMENEZ, SR.

  • G.R. No. L-19565 January 30, 1968 - ESTRELLA DE LA CRUZ v. SEVERINO DE LA CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-20316 January 30, 1968 - LEONCIA CABRERA DE CHUATOCO v. GREGORIO ARAGON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21855 January 30, 1968 - IN RE: ANDRES SINGSON v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22973 January 30, 1968 - MAMBULAO LUMBER COMPANY v. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22215 January 30, 1968 - GONZALO PUYAT & SONS, INC. v. PEDRO LABAYO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23702 January 30, 1968 - MARIA VILLAFLOR v. ARTURO REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23965 January 30, 1968 - FLOREÑA TINAGAN v. JOSE PERLAS, JR.

  • G.R. No. L-21423 January 31, 1968 - GO KIONG OCHURA, ET AL. v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23424 January 31, 1968 - LOURDES ARCUINO, ET AL. v. RUFINA APARIS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22968 January 31, 1968 - BENEDICTO BALUYOT, ET AL. v. EULOGIO E. VENEGAS

  • G.R. No. L-24859 January 31, 1968 - PABLO R. AQUINO v. GENERAL MANAGER OF THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM

  • G.R. No. L-25083 January 31, 1968 - JUSTINO QUETULIO, ET AL. v. NENA Q. DE LA CUESTA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20387 January 31, 1968 - JESUS P. MORFE v. AMELITO R. MUTUC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23170 January 31, 1968 - ALBINA DE LOS SANTOS v. ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23279 January 31, 1968 - ALEJANDRA CUARTO v. ESTELITA DE LUNA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23980 January 31, 1968 - JULIA SAN BUENAVENTURA v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25472 January 31, 1968 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL BANK v. ANGELA PURUGANAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24528 January 31, 1968 - DOMINGO T. LAO v. JOSE MOYA

  • G.R. No. L-22061 January 31, 1968 - DALMACIO URTULA, ET AL. v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-27776 January 31, 1968 - AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE

  • G.R. No. L-28476 January 31, 1968 - ALEJANDRO REYES v. ANATALIO REYES, ET AL.