Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > March 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-27030 March 6, 1968 - PABLO GONZAGA, ET AL. v. MARTINIANO P. VIVO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-27030. March 6, 1968.]

PABLO GONZAGA, ANGEL GONZAGA, AMADOR GONZAGA and ANDRES GONZAGA, Petitioners-Appellees, v. HON. MARTINIANO P. VIVO, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Immigration, Respondent-Appellant.

Mabanag, Elegir and Associates for Petitioners-Appellees.

Solicitor General for Respondent-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. COURTS; REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION; BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION. — An appeal from the decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal granting the issuance of prohibition against the Commissioner of Immigration from arresting and deporting petitioners is in reality a review of the decision of the Board of Commissioners promulgated on March 8, 1962, even if designated as prohibition (Roman Santos v. Secretary Moreno, L-15829, December 4, 1967). The function of the court in this case is only to ascertain whether the findings of the board are in accord with law, free from fraud or imposition, and whether they find any reasonable support in the evidence.

2. EVIDENCE; PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS; PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP; SUFFICIENCY; CASE AT BAR. — Where it appears that in the proceedings before the Board of Commissioners the evidence presented by the petitioners to support that their alleged father, Roman Gonzaga, was a Filipino citizen were: (1) a baptismal certificate stating that Roman Gonzaga was baptized on August 19, 1908 at the age of 21 days thus indicating that he was born on July 30, 1908, and further stating that he is the son of Juliana Gonzaga, a Filipino citizen, of an unknown father; (2) a birth certificate showing that Roman Gonzaga was born on Aug. 9, 1908 to Juliana Gonzaga, and an unknown father; and (3) a landing certificate of residence, issued to Roman Gonzaga, which shows that he was born on July 15, 1908, and was permitted to land as a native born Filipino citizen, the son of Juliana Gonzaga; said evidence engendered doubts as to whether they refer to one person or three different persons, and the Board of Commissioners found that the point was not adequately established.

3. ID.; ID.; PROOF OF PATERNITY AND FILIATION; COMPETENCY; CASE AT BAR. — Petitioners’ claim that they were children of Roman Gonzaga out of marriage with Tan Ho in 1931 was not supported by competent evidence to establish their paternity and filiation. Other than the self-serving testimonies of applicants and their alleged father, nothing was submitted to prove that applicants are children of Roman Gonzaga, a Philippine citizen. Yet on the evidence presented the lower court found that petitioners had sufficiently established their Filipino citizenship and accordingly granted prohibition. In so doing, the court exceeded its power as a reviewer of the findings of an administrative body; for it resolved a factual issue on the basis of something not presented before said administrative body and reversed the latter’s findings. Since, unquestionably, petitioners failed to prove and establish, by sufficient and competent evidence, Philippine citizenship, the court a quo erred in granting the petition in question and restraining the Commissioner of Immigration from arresting and deporting them.

4. CITIZENSHIP; STIPULATION IMPROPER AFTER EXCLUSION ORDER. — Filipino citizenship could not properly be stipulated upon, after petitioners were ordered to be excluded from the country by the Board of Commissioners on the ground of failure to establish their alleged citizenship.


D E C I S I O N


BENGZON, J.P., J.:


Pablo, Angel, Amador and Andres, surnamed Gonzaga, arrived on December 12, 1961 from abroad at the Port of Manila, on board a Cathay Pacific Airways plane. They sought admission to the Philippines, alleging that they were Filipino citizens and the children of one Roman Gonzaga. The Board of Special Inquiry, on December 18, 1961, admitted them as Filipino citizens.

On March 8, 1962, the Board of Commissioners, on review of the decision of the Board of Special Inquiry, held that the aforesaid persons had not satisfactorily established their claim to Filipino citizenship and, therefore, resolved to exclude them from the country. A warrant of arrest and exclusion was thereupon issued against them by the Commissioner of Immigration.

Pablo Gonzaga and his three companions filed, on July 8, 1965, a petition in the Court of First Instance of Rizal, Pasig branch, for prohibition with preliminary injunction, to restrain the Commissioner of Immigration from arresting and deporting them. Said court, on October 23, 1965, after hearing, issued a writ of preliminary injunction.

Respondent filed his answer. The parties then submitted the case for decision upon a stipulation of facts and documentary evidence.

On July 30, 1966, the Court of First Instance found that petitioners had sufficiently established their Filipino citizenship. It therefore granted the prohibition writ applied for and made the preliminary injunction permanent. Appeal was taken to Us from said decision, by the Respondent.

The present action is in reality a review of the decision of the Board of Commissioners, promulgated on March 8, 1962, even if designated as prohibition (Roman Santos v. Secretary Moreno, L-15829, December 4, 1967). As such, the court’s function is only to ascertain whether the findings of the board are in accord with law, free from fraud or imposition, and whether they find any reasonable support in the evidence. (Ibid.)

In the proceedings before the Board of Commissioners, petitioner sought to prove that they are Filipino citizens by showing, first, that Roman Gonzaga is a Filipino citizen; and second, that they are the children of Roman Gonzaga. In support of the first proposition, they presented (1) a baptismal certificate stating that Roman Gonzaga was baptized on August 19, 1908, at the age of 21 days thus indicating that he was born on July 30, 1908, and further stating that he is the son of Juliana Gonzaga, a Filipino, of an unknown father; (2) a birth certificate showing that Roman Gonzaga was born on August 9, 1908 to Juliana Gonzaga, and an unknown father; and (3) a landing certificate of residence, issued to Roman Gonzaga, which shows that he was born on July 15, 1908 and was permitted to land as a native born Filipino citizen, the son of Juliana Gonzaga.

Stating that the dates of birth indicated therein being different, doubt arises as to whether they refer to one person or three different persons, the Board of Commissioners found that the point was not adequately established.

As to the second proposition, it said: "Applicants claim to be the children of Roman Gonzaga out of this aforesaid marriage in 1931 with Tan Ho. Again this claim suffers from lack of competent evidence to establish the paternity and filiation of the claimant children. Other than the self serving testimonies of applicants and their alleged father, nothing was submitted to prove that applicants are the children of Roman Gonzaga, a Philippine citizen."cralaw virtua1aw library

In contrast, the Court of First Instance ruled, on the first point, that the discrepancies as to the date of birth of Roman Gonzaga are immaterial; what controlled is that in said documents he is stated to be the son of Juliana Gonzaga, a Filipino, and an unknown father, which proves him to be a Filipino citizen. And as to the second point, the Court said: "It is undisputed that the petitioners are really children of a Filipino citizen . . ." Apparently, the court had in mind the stipulation of facts which stated, in par. 1, that: "On December 12, 1961, petitioners herein arrived at the port of Manila on board Cathay Pacific Airways plane and sought admission into the Philippines as Filipino citizens, being the children of Roman Gonzaga." 1

In so doing, the court exceeded its powers as a reviewer of the findings of an administrative body; for it resolved a factual issue on the basis of something not presented before said administrative body and reversed the latter’s findings. Furthermore, petitioners’ alleged Filipino citizenship could not properly be stipulated upon, after petitioners were ordered to be excluded from the country by the Board of Commissioners on the ground of failure to establish their alleged Philippine citizenship, the allegation of which was the reason why they were admitted here in the first place. Since, unquestionably, petitioners failed to prove and establish, by sufficient and competent evidence, Philippine citizenship, the court a quo erred in granting the petition in question and restraining the Commissioner of Immigration from arresting and deporting them.

WHEREFORE, the judgment appealed from is hereby reversed and set aside, the petition for prohibition is dismissed, and the preliminary injunction issued by the lower court which was made permanent, is hereby dissolved, with costs against appellees.

SO ORDERED.

Reyes, J. B. L., Actg. C.J., Dizon, Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro, Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.

Concepcion, C.J., is on leave.

Endnotes:



1. Emphasis supplied.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






March-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-21738 March 1, 1968 - IN RE: CHOA EK YONG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-21881 March 1, 1968 - PACIFIC OXYGEN & ACETYLENE COMPANY v. CENTRAL BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES

  • G.R. No. L-23066 March 1, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. VICENTE S. UMALI, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23426 March 1, 1968 - LEOPOLDO SY-QUIA, ET AL. v. MARY MARSMAN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22667 March 1, 1968 - JOSE DE ASIS, ET AL. v. ANGELINA DUMADAUG, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24115 March 1, 1968 - EUFEMIA V. SHAFFER v. VIRGINIA G. PALMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25175 March 1, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SIMPLICIANO SORIA

  • G.R. No. L-26082 March 1, 1968 - NORBERTO DE LA REA v. ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-27030 March 6, 1968 - PABLO GONZAGA, ET AL. v. MARTINIANO P. VIVO

  • G.R. No. L-28473 March 6, 1968 - TAHIR LIDASAN v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28598 March 12, 1968 - NAGA TAGORANAO v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28725 March 12, 1968 - BATANGAS LAGUNA TAYABAS BUS COMPANY v. JOSUE L. CADIAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20865 March 13, 1968 - ASELA P. TACTAQUIN v. JOSE B. PALILEO

  • G.R. No. L-22485 March 13, 1968 - CONSUELO V. CALO v. AJAX INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED

  • G.R. No. L-23351 March 13, 1968 - CIRILO PAREDES v. JOSE L. ESPINO

  • G.R. No. L-23718 March 13, 1968 - JUSTINO LUCERO v. LEON P. DACAYO

  • G.R. No. L-24213 March 13, 1968 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25420 March 13, 1968 - PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY v. FREE TELEPHONE WORKERS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25460 March 13, 1968 - INOCENCIO C. TAN v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26185 March 13, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. WILFORIANO CESAR

  • G.R. No. L-26437 March 13, 1968 - RAQUEL G. DOCE v. BRANCH II OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF QUEZON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26585 March 13, 1968 - NATIONAL MARKETING CORPORATION, ET AL. v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-25738 March 14, 1968 - SILVERIO CAGAMPANG v. FLAVIANO MORANO

  • G.R. No. L-25001 March 15, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RODOLFO B. ALBAPARA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21610 March 15, 1968 - CENTRAL AZUCARERA DON PEDRO v. DON PEDRO SECURITY GUARDS UNION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23912 March 15, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. JOSE CONCEPCION

  • G.R. No. L-19911 March 15, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF CIVIL SERVICE v. JOSE S. BAUTISTA

  • G.R. No. L-22997 March 15, 1968 - PABLO C. MONTALBAN, ET AL. v. GERARDO MAXIMO

  • G.R. No. L-25052 March 15, 1968 - DATU MARIGA DIRAMPATEN v. HADJI MADKI ALONTO

  • G.R. No. L-25302 March 15, 1968 - ABUNDIO MATILLANO, ET AL. v. SEVERIANO DE LEON

  • G.R. No. L-25403 March 15, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. LUIS A. CATALINO

  • G.R. No. L-26331 March 15, 1968 - BALBINO PAMINTUAN, ET AL. v. EMMANUEL M. MUÑOZ

  • G.R. Nos. L-20662 & L-20663 March 19, 1968 - PHILIPPINE MARlNE OFFICERS’ GUILD v. COMPAÑIA MARITIMA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24466 March 19, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JAIME CAPITO @ JIMMY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22486 March 20, 1968 - TEODORO ALMIROL v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF AGUSAN

  • G.R. No. L-23586 March 20, 1968 - A.D. SANTOS, INC. v. VENTURA VASQUEZ

  • G.R. No. L-24826 March 20, 1968 - ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MACONDRAY & CO., INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24918 March 20, 1968 - FELIX DE VILLA v. ANACLETO TRINIDAD, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25939 March 20, 1968 - REPARATIONS COMMISSION v. JESUS P. MORFE

  • G.R. No. L-27106 March 20, 1968 - PALANAN LUMBER & PLYWOOD CO., INC., ET AL. v. MANUEL ARRANZ

  • G.R. Nos. L-20589-90 March 21, 1968 - ERNESTO DEL ROSARIO v. VICTORINO DE LOS SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22231 March 21, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MARCELO PAAT

  • G.R. No. L-23565 March 21, 1968 - INSULAR LIFE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25640 March 21, 1968 - VICTORIAS MILLING CO., INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26538 March 21, 1968 - MELECIO ROSARIO, ET AL. v. TAYUG RURAL BANK, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-26922 and 26923 March 21, 1968 - EUFRACIO FAGTANAC, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • A.C. No. 101 March 27, 1968 - EMETERIO A. BUYCO, ET AL. v. MARIANO A. ZOSA

  • G.R. No. L-19378 March 27, 1968 - ACOJE MINING COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20046 March 27, 1968 - ROMEO PAYLAGO, ET AL. v. INES PASTRANA JARABE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22265 March 27, 1968 - COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GOODRICH INTERNATIONAL RUBBER CO.

  • G.R. No. L-22984 March 27, 1968 - MARGARITO SARONA, ET AL. v. FELIPE VILLEGAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23467 March 27, 1968 - AMALGAMATED LABORERS’ ASSOCIATION v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23489 March 27, 1968 - JULIAN ABANA v. FRANCISCO QUISUMBING

  • G.R. Nos. L-24123, L-24124, L-24125 & L-24126 March 27, 1968 - GREGORIO ROBLES v. CONCEPCION FERNANDO BLAYLOCK, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25471 March 27, 1968 - BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC., ET AL. v. BCI EMPLOYEES & WORKERS UNION-PAFLU, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25513 March 27, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROSAURO C. DIONISIO

  • G.R. No. L-25676 March 27, 1968 - ROSENDA A. DE NUQUI, ET AL. v. ILDEFONSO D. YAP

  • G.R. No. L-26213 March 27, 1968 - PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF FREE LABOR UNIONS (PAFLU), ET AL. v. PIO R. MARCOS

  • G.R. Nos. L-28550 to L-28552 March 27, 1968 - PEDRO R. DIZON v. TITO V. TIZON

  • G.R. No. L-28563 March 27, 1968 - GOV. PEDRO R. DIZON v. HON. TITO V. TIZON

  • G.R. No. L-21196 March 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ELPIDIO BELCHEZ

  • G.R. No. L-22535 March 28, 1968 - ALFREDO VILLARUEL v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24440 March 28, 1968 - PROVINCE OF ZAMBOANGA DEL NORTE v. CITY OF ZAMBOANGA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24660 March 28, 1968 - PEDRO VIDAL, ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-27757 March 28, 1968 - RICARDO DEQUITO v. LEOPOLDO LOPEZ, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20477 March 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX B. ACEBEDO

  • G.R. No. L-20802 March 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. REPUBLIC SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-21890 March 29, 1968 - MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22062 March 29, 1968 - GREGORIO Y. ROMERO v. MUNICIPAL MAYOR OF BOLJOON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22759 March 29, 1968 - MANUEL R. JIMENEZ v. ALBERTO V. AVERIA

  • G.R. No. L-25366 March 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE BUAN

  • G.R. No. L-25475 March 29, 1968 - FELICIDAD REYES-TALAG v. REGISTER OF DEEDS OF LAGUNA

  • G.R. No. L-26830 March 29, 1968 - CIPRIANO A. FALCON, ET AL. v. FELICIANO OROBIA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23375 March 30, 1968 - FRANCISCO ORFIDA v. PEDRO PANUELOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28539 March 30, 1968 - SALVADOR Q. PEDIDO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.