Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > May 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-25308 May 22, 1968 - ELISEO EGUIA DUMAPIG v. GERONIMO R. MARAVE, ET AL.:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-25308. May 22, 1968.]

ELISEO EGUIA DUMAPIG, Petitioner, v. HON. GERONIMO R. MARAVE, Presiding Judge, Branch II (Ozamis City), Court of First Instance of Misamis Occidental; and THE CITY FISCAL and/or THE SPECIAL COUNSEL OF OZAMIS CITY, Respondents.

Pablo Badong for petitioner. Hon. Geronimo R. Marave in his own behalf, Respondent. Amado F. Codor and P.S. Ammas for Respondents.


SYLLABUS


1. REMEDIAL LAW; CRIMINAL PROCEDURE; EVIDENCE; PRESENTATION THEREOF BY THE ACCUSED NOT DEPENDENT ON AVAILABILITY OF TRANSCRIPT OF STENOGRAPHIC NOTES OF PROSECUTION’S EVIDENCE. — There is no legal provision to support the view that before an accused in a criminal case may be compelled to produce his evidence, the transcript of stenographic notes taken of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses must be made available to him. It is the duty of counsel for the accused to take notes of the testimony of said witnesses in order to be in position to present his evidence in defense of his client.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


Petitioner Eliseo Eguia Dumapig and others were charged with murder, with assault upon an agent of a person in authority, before the Court of First Instance of the City of Ozamis in an amended information filed therewith by City Fiscal Amado Cador. They were tried upon a plea of not guilty, the prosecution having rested its case. Thereupon, the defense filed a motion to dismiss the case upon the ground that the guilt of the defendants had not been established beyond reasonable doubt, but the respondent judge denied the motion in his order of September 22, 1965, which also set the case for the continuation of the trial on October 7 to 9 of the same year. Thereafter, the defense filed a motion to postpone the continuation of the trial upon the ground that the transcript of the stenographic notes taken of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was not yet available. This motion was apparently granted because the continuation of the trial was reset for October 25 to 27 of the same year. Counsel for the defendants again filed a motion to postpone the same upon exactly the same ground and the trial was again reset for continuation on November 17, 1965, with the warning that no further postponement would be granted.

On November 14, 1965, however, apparently upon the instance of the court itself, the case was postponed again to December 14 to 16, 1965 in view of the fact that stenographer Magallanes had not yet been able to transcribe his notes. The Court, however, warned the parties — particularly the defense — that no further postponement would be granted, and, in fact denied the latter’s motion for an indefinite postponement.

On November 15, 1965, petitioner filed the present petition for certiorari and prohibition, with a prayer for a writ of preliminary injunction, to prevent the respondent court from going ahead with the continuation of the trial, claiming that the order of the respondent judge denying his motion for an indefinite postponement of the trial or until the transcript of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses has been filed in the record is illegal because it violates his right to defend himself properly.

The petition was given due course and on the 17th of November 1965 We issued a temporary restraining order effective only up to and including December 2 of the same year. Petitioner’s motion to extend the effectivity of the said restraining order until the present case is decided was deemed by Us on December 8, 1965. However, the continuation of the trial could not be held below for the reason that the respondent judge filed an answer in the present proceeding to which he attached and submitted to Us the entire record of the case, together with all the transcript of the stenographic notes taken of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses.

Upon the facts above setforth, it is clear that the petition under consideration has absolutely no merit. No legal provision We are aware of supports petitioner’s view that before an accused in a criminal case may be compelled to produce his evidence, the transcript of the stenographic notes taken of the testimony of the prosecution witnesses must be made available to him. In this connection, it is obvious that it is the duty of his counsel to take notes whether complete or incomplete, of the testimony of said witnesses in order to be in a position to present whatever evidence, in his opinion, is necessary to prove the innocence of his client.

In connection with the issue under consideration, all that the defendant in a criminal case is entitled to under the Rules is two days after arraignment to prepare himself for trial. This, petitioner has enjoyed and more.

WHEREFORE, the petition under consideration is dismissed and the writs therein prayed for denied, with costs. Let the records of Criminal Case No. OZ-230, elevated to this Court by the respondent judge be remanded to the Court of First Instance of Ozamiz City for the immediate continuation of the trial. It is so ordered.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro and Angeles, JJ., concur.

Fernando, J., is on official leave.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






May-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-25668 May 2, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMAN JUGILON, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22005 May 3, 1968 - JESUSA LACSON VDA. DE ARROYO, ET AL. v. EL BEATERIO DEL SANTISSIMO ROSARIO DE MOLO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26065 May 3, 1968 - GERONIMO P. ZALDIVAR v. NUMERIANO ESTENZO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21743 May 4, 1968 - FEDERICO CAÑETE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23458 May 4, 1968 - NATIONAL SHIPYARDS AND STEEL CORP. v. NATIONAL SHIPYARDS EMPLOYEES & WORKERS ASSOC, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24264 May 4, 1968 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATION CO. v. MANILA PORT SERVICE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19829 May 4, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO COKENG

  • G.R. No. L-24538 May 4, 1968 - IN RE: PONCIANO B. FLORES v. ROSALINA SANTOS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28469 May 7, 1968 - UNA KIBAD v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25345 May 13, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. ROMULO GARCELLANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24247 May 13, 1968 - COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. ACTG. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. Nos. L-21583 and L-21591-92 May 20, 1968 - DANIEL BULANTE v. CHU LIANTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23758 May 20, 1968 - MAXIMINA OYOD DE GARCES, ET AL. v. ESMERALDA BROCE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24983 May 20, 1968 - FLORENTINO GENATO, ET AL. v. FELISA GENATO DE LORENZO

  • G.R. No. L-24560 May 21, 1968 - CONSUELO S. CALALANG v. ENRIQUE MEDINA, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20952 May 22, 1968 - IN RE: CHUA UAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-22250 May 22, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EULOGIO BALAO

  • G.R. No. L-22320 May 22, 1968 - MERCEDES RUTH COBB-PEREZ, ET AL. v. GREGORIO LANTIN, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23640 May 22, 1968 - REMEDIOS MALUPA VDA. DE LAYAG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-24192 May 22, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS v. CALTEX (PHILIPPINES), INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25308 May 22, 1968 - ELISEO EGUIA DUMAPIG v. GERONIMO R. MARAVE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25819 May 22, 1968 - VITALIANO B. VALDES v. LUCIO C. GUTIERREZ, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-27252 May 22, 1968 - FELIPE IMPERIAL v. ROMAN CATHOLIC OF ARCHBISHOP OF CACERES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20891 May 23, 1968 - TOMAS B. TADEO v. ROMULO VISPERAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24665 May 23, 1968 - TIBURCIO ALCOBER, ET AL. v. HONORATO GARCIANO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24805 May 23, 1968 - IN RE: YAP PUEY ENG v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-25165 May 23, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. REFUGIO DEVARAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23017 May 23, 1968 - LA SUERTE CIGAR & CIGARETTE FACTORY v. CENTRAL AZUCARERA DEL DANAO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24173 May 23, 1968 - PROCTER & GAMBLE PHILIPPINE MFG. CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS

  • G.R. No. L-24410 May 23, 1968 - BERNARDA NAZAL v. FELICIANO BELMONTE, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22347 May 27, 1968 - FILIPINAS INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, ET AL. v. LOURDES P. SAN DIEGO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22611 May 27, 1968 - COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. VISAYAN ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22943 May 27, 1968 - IN RE: TEH SAN v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-23056 May 27, 1968 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. NICASIO YATCO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24280 May 27, 1968 - EUNARIA B. VDA. DE GUILAS, ET AL. v. ANANIAS DAVID, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24564 May 27, 1968 - AMADO L. MENDOZA v. RODRIGUEZ & COMPANY, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24581 May 27, 1968 - MIGUEL PEREZ RUBIO v. SAMUEL REYES, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24772 May 27, 1968 - RUPERTO G. CRUZ, ET AL. v. FlLIPINAS INVESTMENT & FINANCE CORPORATION

  • G.R. No. L-24800 May 27, 1968 - IN RE: PIO NERIA v. COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

  • G.R. No. L-26077 May 27, 1968 - SURIGAO CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY, INC. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26797 May 27, 1968 - REYNALDO JIMENEZ, ET AL. v. ARTURO JIMENEZ

  • G.R. No. L-27598 May 27, 1968 - ELISA MEDINA CUE v. PILAR DOLLA

  • G.R. No. L-24288 May 28, 1968 - LEONOR MANUEL CASTILLO UDAN v. QUIRICO C. AMON, ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24484 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. RAMON C. NARCISO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25942 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. FELIX FERNANDO

  • G.R. No. L-25997 May 28, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. MONICA ANINO

  • G.R. No. L-27951 May 28, 1968 - PABLO C. SANIDAD v. CRESCENCIANO L. SAQUING, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-28955 May 28, 1968 - USO DAN AGUAM v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19867 May 29, 1968 - GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM v. CALSONS, INC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20322 May 29, 1968 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL. v. PERFECTO R. PALACIO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-22030 May 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. DARIO ROLDAN

  • G.R. No. L-22426 May 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. PELAGIO CONDEMENA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23021 May 29, 1968 - MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MARIANO RIVERA, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24490 May 29, 1968 - CIRIACO LANDA v. FRANCISCO TOBIAS, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24664 May 29, 1968 - CORAZON ALEGRE, ET AL. v. VICTORINA G. DE LAPERAL

  • G.R. No. L-24677 May 29, 1968 - YAP TECK SUY v. MANILA PORT SERVICE ETC., ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25551 May 29, 1968 - IN RE: CHAN DE v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26364 May 29, 1968 - MARIANO A. ALBERT v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, ET AL.