Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence


Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1968 > November 1968 Decisions > G.R. No. L-27852 November 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDDIE BUENBRAZO:




PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

EN BANC

[G.R. No. L-27852. November 29, 1968.]

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDDIE BUENBRAZO, Defendant-Appellant.

Assistant Solicitor General Pacifico P. de Castro and Solicitor Enrique M. Reyes for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Miguel P. Olivar, for Defendant-Appellant.


SYLLABUS


1. CRIMINAL LAW; MURDER; CIRCUMSTANCES IN CASE AT BAR REJECTING THE DEFENSE VERSION THAT THE DECEASED WAS THE AGGRESSOR; JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AFFIRMED. — In the present case, the trial court arrived at the definite conclusion that the accused is guilty of murder because while Simplicio Talaroc and four others were conversing merrily near the wharf, appellant, accompanied by Sulpicio Torino, arrived at the place; that immediately Torino placed his arm around Simplicio’s shoulders and engaged him in a conversation; that suddenly appellant stabbed Simplicio on the latter’s left arm, the weapon penetrating his side, as a result of which he died of hemorrhage. If the deceased, armed with a hunting knife, was really the first to attack appellant, the latter could not have avoided suffering physical injuries. The fact, however, is that he suffered no "injury at all, not even a scratch." Hence, the judgment of conviction was affirmed except that the indemnity was increased from P6,000 to P12,000.


D E C I S I O N


DIZON, J.:


Appellant Eddie Buenbrazo and Sulpicio Torino were charged with murder in the Court of First Instance Of Misamis Occidental. As the latter remained at large for sometime, the case went on only against appellant who, after trial upon a plea of not guilty, was convicted as charged and sentenced to suffer the penalty of reclusion perpetua, with the accessory penalties of the law, to indemnify the heirs of the deceased Simplicio Talaroc in the sum of P6,000, without subsidiary imprisonment in case of insolvency, and to pay the costs.

It is not disputed that Simplicio Talaroc died of a stab wound inflicted upon him in the evening of November 27, 1965 at the wharf area of Ozamiz City, Misamis Occidental.

Appellant admits having stabbed the deceased but claims that he did it in self-defense. It was, therefore, incumbent upon him to establish all the facts necessary to prove self-defense. In his brief he states what, according to him, were the circumstances under which he stabbed the deceased Simplicio Talaroc its follows:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"On a certain occasion before November 27, 1965, Eddie Buenbrazo was eating inside the store of Mrs. Gutierrez located at the wharf, Ozamiz City. Unexpectedly, Simplicio Talaroc came and asked Eddie Buenbrazo for a drink. In retort, the latter told the former that his money was just enough to pay for what he was eating. Utterly dismayed, Simplicio Talaroc went out of the store murmuring something.

"On November 27, 1965, at around 9 `clock in the evening, Simplicio Talaroc with a companion went to the dance at Katagalogan, Ozamiz City. A few moments after seeing the dance, he inquired from one Romeo Oligo, in-charge of the dance, as to where Eddie Buenbrazo was. The latter told the former that Eddie Buenbrazo was at the wharf waiting for a boat to work on. But Simplicio Talaroc got mad at Romeo Oligo, and sternly forewarned him that once he gets back to the dance and sees Eddie Buenbrazo thereat, he (Romeo Oligo) would be implicated in a case.

"Consequently, Simplicio Talaroc proceeded to the wharf. When he saw Eddie Buenbrazo coming out of the store of Mrs. Gutierez, Simplicio Talaroc exclaimed, `Here is Eddie!’ Right then and there he rushed toward Eddie Buenbrazo, drew a hunting knife and thrust it upon him. But the latter parried the hunting knife by giving a sudden stroke with his open palm with straight fingers closed together to the right hand of the former which held the said weapon. The weapon dropped to the ground. Then Eddie Buenbrazo picked up the hunting knife and a vigorous struggle between the two ensued as one was trying to overpower the other, especially Eddie Buenbrazo who labored hard to defend his life and limbs against the homicidal assault of Simplicio Talaroc. When Simplicio Talaroc held the left hand of Eddie Buenbrazo with his two hands, the former pulled the latter. But Eddie Buenbrazo resisted and tried to get himself free from the hold of Simplicio Talaroc. In order to extricate himself, he stabbed the left arm of his assailant. Resultantly, he was released and so he ran away. He went to the house of his uncle Luis Buenbrazo, at Katagalogan, Ozamiz City, where he was staying at that time.

"In that scuffle, Simplicio Talaroc sustained two stab wounds, one on his breast, left side, and the other on his left arm. But these wounds were caused by one thrust only."cralaw virtua1aw library

As against the above, We have the testimony of several prosecution witnesses which, according to the lower court, established the following:jgc:chanrobles.com.ph

"It appears from the evidence for the prosecution that prior to November 27, 1965, the accused and the late Simplicio Talaroc had grudges. Between 9:00 and 10:00 in the evening of November 27, 1965, Simplicio Talaroc, Alan Perez, Rene Balatero, Aling Apdal and Diosdado Omelig were at the wharf, Ozamiz City. While they were conversing, the accused Eddie Buenbrazo, accompanied by one Torino, came. Torino placed his arm around the shoulder of Simplicio and engaged him in a conversation. While so conversing, the accused suddenly stabbed Simplicio with a pointed knife, hitting him on his left breast. Torino faced Rene Balatero and asked him if he would defend Simplicio to which Balatero replied that he did not have anything to do with the incident. Torino nevertheless boxed him but he was not hit. In the meantime, Simplicio ran towards the PC Headquarters, followed by Rene Balatero. The others ran in different directions. Simplicio was at once brought to the Rico Medina Hospital, Ozamiz City, where Sgt. Bonifacio Engracia of the Ozamiz City Police Department took his dying declaration, Exhibit `A’. Dr. Medina examined Simplicio and found on his body two injuries, one at the left arm and the other, on his left side. The injury on the left side was fatal. There was only one thrust. Cause of death was external hemorrhage, secondary to the stab wounds. Lt. Tamparong, Sgt. Bonifacio Engracia and other members of the Ozamiz City Police Department went to the house of the accused to arrest him. Upon reaching the premises, they were informed that the accused was in the house of his uncle, Luis Buenbrazo. Lt. Tamparong and companions proceeded to this house and inquired for the accused. When the accused appeared, Lt. Tamparong asked him if he was the one who stabbed Simplicio Talaroc and he answered in the affirmative. He was also asked to produce the hunting knife used in stabbing Simplicio and he gave it to Lt. Tamparong who in turn delivered it to the sergeant of the guard."cralaw virtua1aw library

Made to choose between the version given by the prosecution witnesses, on the one hand, and those of the defense, on the other, the trial court arrived at the definite conclusion that "the accused is guilty of murder" because while Simplicio Talaroc and four others were conversing merrily near the wharf, appellant, accompanied by Simplicio Torino, arrived at the place; that immediately Torino placed his arm around Simplicio’s shoulders and engaged him in a conversation; that suddenly appellant stabbed Simplicio on the latter’s left arm, the weapon penetrating his side, as a result of which he died of hemorrhage.

We agree entirely with the lower court, particularly when it held that if the deceased, armed with a hunting knife, was really the first to attack appellant, the latter could not have avoided suffering physical injuries. The fact, however, is that he suffered no "injury at all, not even a scratch."cralaw virtua1aw library

After a careful review of the record, We find no justification at all to change the findings and conclusions of the trial court with respect to the facts of the case.

WHEREFORE, the appealed decision is hereby affirmed, except that the indemnity of P6,000 to be paid by appellant to the heirs of the deceased is increased to P12,000.

As a result, our resolution of January 17, 1968 granting appellant’s motion to be released on bail is set aside, and the bail bond submitted by him in that connection is hereby disapproved.

With costs.

Concepcion, C.J., Reyes, J.B.L., Makalintal, Zaldivar, Sanchez, Ruiz Castro, Fernando and Capistrano, JJ., concur.




Back to Home | Back to Main




















chanrobles.com





ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com

ChanRobles MCLE On-line

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. - ChanRobles MCLE On-line : www.chanroblesmcleonline.com






November-1968 Jurisprudence                 

  • G.R. No. L-29612 November 15, 1968 - LUCIANO A. SAULOG v. CUSTOMBUILT MANUFACTURING CORP, ET AL..

  • A.C. No. 555 November 25, 1968 - ERNESTO M. NOMBRADO v. JUANITO T. HERNANDEZ

  • G.R. No. L-22508 November 25, 1968 - FLORO BUENCONSEJO v. COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-21757 November 26, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. KASILA SANGARAN

  • G.R. No. L-25858 November 26, 1968 - LU MING, ET., AL. v. VICENTE LOPEZ, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-25972 November 26, 1968 - LEONARDO C. GUTIERREZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET., AL

  • A.C. No. 217 November 27, 1968 - NIEVES RILLAS VDA. DE BARRERA v. CASIANO U. LAPUT

  • G.R. No. 20014 November 27, 1968 - FRANCISCO CRISOLOGO, ET., AL. v. ISAAC CENTENO, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-20075 November 27, 1968 - SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY v. CENON LAURENTE

  • G.R. No. L-21545 November 27, 1968 - EUFEMIA RIVERA v. MARIA CONCEPCION PAEZ VDA. DE CRUZ

  • G.R. No. L-22240 November 27, 1968 - SANTIAGO BALMONTE v. JULIAN MARCELO, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-22705 November 27, 1968 - ANTHONY CHAN v. OCEANIC WIRELESS NETWORK, INC.,

  • G.R. No. L-22717 November 27, 1968 - GEMINIANO L. GONZALES v. SATURNINA GONZALES, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-25609 November 27, 1968 - MARGARET ANN WAINRIGHT VERSOZA, ET., AL. v. JOSE MA. VERSOZA

  • G.R. No. L-26461 November 27, 1968 - ASSOCIATED LABOR UNION v. JOSE C. BORROMEO, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-26341 November 27, 1968 - ILOILO DOCK & ENGINEERING CO. v. WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION COMMISSION

  • G.R. No. L-23345 November 27, 1968 - DIONISIO ABENAZA, ET., AL v. COURT OF APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-24624 November 27, 1968 - SINFOROSA ALCA v. COURT OF TAX APPEALS

  • G.R. No. L-25372 November 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. SENCIO GUTIERREZ, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29658 November 29, 1968 - ENRIQUE V. MORALES v. ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-23967 November 29, 1968 - ANTONINO M. MILANES v. EULOGIO F. DE GUZMAN

  • G.R. No. L-20390 November 29, 1968 - RAUL R. INGLES, ET., AL. v. AMELITO R. MUTUC, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23276 November 29, 1968 - MELECIO COQUIA, ET., AL. v. FIELDMEN’S INSURANCE CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-19143 November 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. SANTOS RAMOS, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-19196 November 29, 1968 - ANGEL VILLARICA, ET., AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-20121 November 29, 1968 - ALFREDO APAO, ET., AL. v. TITO V. TIZON, ET., AL

  • G.R. No. L-21725 November 29, 1968 - AURELIO ARCILLAS v. GREGORIO D. MONTEJO, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-20768 November 29, 1968 - ELISEO B. LEMI v. BRIGIDO VALENCIA

  • G.R. No. L-22377 November 29, 1968 - MUNICIPALITY (now CITY) OF LEGASPI v. A.L. AMMEN TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.

  • G.R. No. L-22243 November 29, 1968 - RILECO, INC., v. MINDANAO CONGRESS OF LABOR-RAMIE UNITED FARM WORKERS’ ASSOCIATION

  • G.R. No. L-22802 November 29, 1968 - MAXIMO H. GREGORIO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-23072 November 29, 1968 - SIMEON B. MIGUEL, ET AL., v. FLORENDO CATALINO

  • G.R. No. L-23145 November 29, 1968 - RENATO D. TAYAG v. BENGUET CONSOLIDATED, INC.

  • G.R. No. L-23428 November 29, 1968 - DETECTIVE & PROTECTIVE BUREAU, INC. v. GAUDENCIO CLORIBEL

  • G.R. No. L-23971 November 29, 1968 - ASSOCIATED INSURANCE& SURETY CO., INC., v. ANTONIO BANZON, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24019 November 29, 1968 - PHILIPPINE EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION, ET., AL. v. MLQSEA FACULTY ASSOCIATION, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-24963 November 29, 1968 - G. LINER v. NATIONAL LABOR UNION, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-2509 November 29, 1968 - NILDA SURA v. VICENTE SILVESTRE MARTIN, SR.

  • G.R. No. L-25589 November 29, 1968 - CITY OF LECAZPI v. ROBERTO ZURBANO

  • G.R. No. L-25677 November 29, 1968 - JOVITO O. VITANZO v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHIL.

  • G.R. No. L-26082 November 29, 1968 - NORBERTO DE LA REA v. ABELARDO SUBIDO

  • G.R. No. L-27145 November 29, 1968 - MARIQUITA LUNA v. GERONIMO CARANDANG

  • G.R. No. L-27511 November 29, 1968 - SIMON LUNA v. LORENZO M. PLAZA

  • G.R. No. L-27852 November 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. EDDIE BUENBRAZO

  • G.R. No. L-29696 November 29, 1968 - JESUS GIGANTE v. REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK, ET., AL.

  • G.R. No. L-29766 November 29, 1968 - PERMANENT CONCRETE PRODUCTS, INC. v. DONATO TEODORO

  • G.R. No. L-20352 November 29, 1968 - LILIA YUSAY GONZALEZ v. HON. WENCESLAO L. FERNAN, ET., AL.

  • G.R. Nos. L-18660 & L-18661 November 29, 1968 - PEOPLE OF THE PHIL. v. JOSE ALTO, ET AL.

  • G.R. No. L-21362 November 29, 1968 - DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE PHIL. v. LOURDES GASPAR BAUTISTA